Donald Trump To Run For President in 2016!!!!!!!!

[brooks85]

^you are one of the most illogical posters here maximo as already proven

[MonkeyF0cker]

yeah, your logic is working great for Europe.



you're not very bright.

You're scared. I get it. Cower like the coward you are and the media you watch has made you to be. Just don't go calling other people names because of your own bitch-ass cowardice. That's disingenuous.

[Dr.Gonzo]

Believe it or not, I actually watch Faux News from time to time to see what dopey pawns like yourself are being fed. I'm well aware of their ridiculous motif on the "attack" on Christianity. While you actively support the removal of true freedoms (like travel bans) of American citizens based on their religion, you're worried that nobody says Merry Christmas to you anymore. Wah. You're too brainwashed to see through the bullshit obviously.

We actually don't watch much Fox News, you're like a bad meme.

[Dr.Gonzo]

You're scared. I get it. Cower like the coward you are and the media you watch has made you to be. Just don't go calling other people names because of your own bitch-ass cowardice. That's disingenuous.

Didn't you use to be a pro gambler? Try some pattern recognition and stop being such a coward, yes refusing to look at facts because of muh feels is cowardism.

[MonkeyF0cker]

We actually don't watch much Fox News, you're like a bad meme.

Uhh. Who is "we"? Speaking for others now, are "we"?

[MonkeyF0cker]

Didn't you use to be a pro gambler? Try some pattern recognition and stop being such a coward, yes refusing to look at facts because of muh feels is cowardism.

I'm a coward because I'm not scared of something that has the chance of winning the lottery of happening to me? LOL.

I guess that's a good example of why you're not a professional gambler.

Thanks for the lesson in logic.

[Dr.Gonzo]

Uhh. Who is "we"? Speaking for others now?

Yeah, I can speak in generalities for Trump supporters and younger people on the right.

[MonkeyF0cker]

Yeah, I can speak in generalities for Trump supporters and younger people on the right.

True, people like you love to stereotype and speak about others collectively. It's called bigotry.

[Dr.Gonzo]

I'm a coward because I'm not scared of something that has the chance of winning the lottery of happening to me? LOL.

I guess that's a good example of why you're not a professional gambler.

Thanks for the lesson in logic.

You're a coward because you'd rather engage in status signalling than constructive and rational policy.

No, I'm a professional gambler.

But you're a degenerate cuck.

[Dr.Gonzo]

True, people like you love to stereotype and speak about others collectively. It's called bigotry.

Yes, you need to judge collectives as collectives, moron.

[MonkeyF0cker]

Your a coward because you'd rather engage in status signalling than constructive and rational policy.

No, I'm a professional gambler.

But you're a degenerate cuck.

Constructive like banning freedoms based on religion or ethnicity? LOL.

I forget how many morons on SBR are professional gamblers. Never heard of ya, pal. And certainly never will.

[MonkeyF0cker]

Yes, you need to judge collectives as collectives, moron.

Because individuality and the ability to think for oneself doesn't exist in the mind of a bigot...

Trust me, I understand how simple-minded people operate. It's how I've made a good living for quite a number of years.

[Dr.Gonzo]

Calls the right dopey pawns, doesn't think he's a bigot.

[Dr.Gonzo]

Constructive like banning freedoms based on religion or ethnicity? LOL.

I forget how many morons on SBR are professional gamblers. Never heard of ya, pal. And certainly never will.

Yes, not letting Isis into your nation is a wise move.

If you're a professional gambler and you're still located in the US you're braindead.

[MonkeyF0cker]

If you're a professional gambler and you're still located in the US you're braindead.

Because the internet only exists offshore? Because you can't own a home offshore and Vegas and make the best of both worlds?

You're sharp like a raisin obviously.

[MonkeyF0cker]

Calls the right dopey pawns, doesn't think he's a bigot.

I only call dopey pawns "dopey pawns," dopey pawn.

[Dr.Gonzo]

Because individuality and the ability to think for oneself doesn't exist in the mind of a bigot...

Trust me, I understand how simple-minded people operate. It's how I've made a good living for quite a number of years.

I'm a realist libertarian, try again cuck.

If you don't apply any consequentialist thought to your ideas you'll end up in disaster, lets not let Rome burn for muh principles.

[Dr.Gonzo]

I only call dopey pawns "dopey pawns," dopey pawn.

I call "selfish, degenerate, nihilist cucks," selfish, degenerate, nihilist cucks.

[MonkeyF0cker]

I'm a realist libertarian, try again cuck.

If you don't apply any consequentialist thought to your ideas you'll end up in disaster, lets not let Rome burn for muh principles.

Because true libertarians (see anarchists) are scared of consequences. You're fvckin clueless. LOL.

[Dr.Gonzo]

Literally Nietzsche's Last Man, thinks he's a unique snowflake.

You're like a bad meme.

[MonkeyF0cker]

I call "selfish, degenerate, nihilist cucks," selfish, degenerate, nihilist cucks.

Think what you want - or in your case, what you're told to think.

[MonkeyF0cker]

Literally Nietzsche's Last Man, thinks he's a unique snowflake.

You're like a bad meme.

You're definitely not a unique snowflake. There are millions of you morons around.

Does that make you feel better about yourself? Like you belong?

[ACoochy]

Focker PWNING Gonzo here...

MF i put this clown on ignore months ago.

Id advise doing the same pal...

[Dr.Gonzo]

Because true libertarians (see anarchists) are scared of consequences. You're fvckin clueless. LOL.

Anti-science egalitarianism is not a requirement for libertarians.

Read Rothbard and Hoppe you cuck.

Your brand of anarchism is autism on parade.

[Dr.Gonzo]

You're definitely not a unique snowflake. There are millions of you morons around.

Does that make you feel better about yourself? Like you belong?

Good, then we'll win.

[MonkeyF0cker]

Anti-science egalitarianism is not a requirement for libertarians.

Read Rothbard and Hoppe you cuck.

Your brand of anarchism is autism on parade.

No. Just anti-science climatology is a requirement. AMIRITE?

Aww, shit. Name droppin' Austrian economists FTW! It makes you sound smart to other braindead pawns. It doesn't require any actual economic comprehension though.

I worked for years with a prop trading firm on the CBOE. So, I'm sure you understand economics to a far greater extent than my friends and I.

[Dr.Gonzo]

No. Just anti-science climatology is a requirement. AMIRITE?

Aww, shit. Name droppin' Austrian economists FTW! It makes you sound smart to other braindead pawns. It doesn't require any actual economic comprehension though.

I worked for years with a prop trading firm on the CBOE. So, I'm sure you understand economics to a far greater extent than my friends and I.

Explain why CO2 is bad.

I cited them for their arguments moron.

And yet, you're pushing Bernie, must have cracked under the pressure.

[MonkeyF0cker]

So, what's next, Gonzo? Are you going to expound on the imperfections of the Fed and how it should be abolished (like you're the first moron to repeat that nonsense)? Of course, you probably have no clue about all of the bank failures and currency issues that ran rampant prior to central banking in the U.S. or the massive wealth disparity during the Gilded Age. Give it your best shot, champ. I've had many arguments with people far more intelligent and knowledgeable than you on the subject.

[Dr.Gonzo]

No, I'm just going to laugh at you and your climatology dodge.

[MonkeyF0cker]

Explain why CO2 is bad.

I cited them for their arguments moron.

And yet, you're pushing Bernie, must have cracked under the pressure.

Your first step would be learning from the overwhelming number of scientists which define it as a threat to the ecosystem and have far more intimate knowledge than you or I on the subject. I would start with oceanic acidification though. It's pretty easy for even a layman to understand the chemistry behind the creation of carbonic acid in the ocean from the expulsion of CO2 in the atmosphere.

[The Kraken]

Gonzo do your own homework guy

You come to a discussion and ask "why is CO2 bad"



Unless you have a hypothesis why it isn't bad, that's poor form

[Dr.Gonzo]

Your first step would be learning from the overwhelming number of scientists which define it as a threat to the ecosystem and have far more intimate knowledge than you or I on the subject. I would start with oceanic acidification though. It's pretty easy for even a layman to understand the chemistry behind the creation of carbonic acid in the ocean from the expulsion of CO2 in the atmosphere.

I refute it is a threat to the ecosystem.

[MonkeyF0cker]

I refute it is a threat to the ecosystem.

I would expect such an intelligent response from someone of your ilk. Dismissive via ignorance.

Not exceeding expectations - the definition of doing well in life.

[Dr.Gonzo]

I would expect such an intelligent response from someone of your ilk. Not exceeding expectations - the definition of doing well in life.

It's a simple argument, doesn't need any complexities.

[MonkeyF0cker]

No, I'm just going to laugh at you and your climatology dodge.

Oh, the irony. LOL.