What is your best bet for the Superbowl?

[daneblazer]

What is your best bet for the Superbowl?

Ne -1.5
Sea +1.5
Over 48
Under 48
Other

You can actually pick more than 1

[minet123]

Final score is 4-2

[etothep]

etothep's beer consumption: O24

[High3rEl3m3nt]

Sea ml

[kaliboyz]

New england -6.5 +206
And Over 50.5 +121

@ heritagesports

[Jayvegas420]

The Gronk to score a TD

[jjgold]

Too far away… Do not even know the line on the game

[daneblazer]

I'm leaning pats

[scumbag]

take the Hawks ML... you'll be glad you did.

here's the deal.

i was all over ravens, plus the points, lil taste on the ML. The Ravens had the best front 7 i can recall in ages... they were really fcking good... but their back end was horrendous.

if their backend was at least OK, instead of horrendous, pat's are already out of the playoffs. Forsett ran the ball down their throats and they couldn't get pressure on Flacco. this defense can be had.

they couldn't run the ball for shit against the ravens. you can throw the ball 50 times against them, and have success, good luck trying that against the hawks. they're going to need to establish the run, but they won't be able to.

couple all that with the fact that i think these pat's, thanks to belly, who's such a nail bitter, are gonna come out tight. these hawks on the other hand, will come out loose as fck, flying around, knocking people out. its going to be a close knock down drag out, like all the other pat super bowls, (in which case you gotta take the way stronger defense and running game) or the hawks will flat crush them. pat's won't win big.

hawks gonna repeat on the last team to repeat.

don't feel as good as i did bout last year. but i think its the right bet. i'm in no hurry to bet as i think this could go to sea +2.5.

[cburland10]

take the Hawks ML... you'll be glad you did.

here's the deal.

i was all over ravens, plus the points, lil taste on the ML. The Ravens had the best front 7 i can recall in ages... they were really fcking good... but their back end was horrendous.

if their backend was at least OK, instead of horrendous, pat's are already out of the playoffs. Forsett ran the ball down their throats and they couldn't get pressure on Flacco. this defense can be had.

they couldn't run the ball for shit against the ravens. you can throw the ball 50 times against them, and have success, good luck trying that against the hawks. they're going to need to establish the run, but they won't be able to.

couple all that with the fact that i think these pat's, thanks to belly, who's such a nail bitter, are gonna come out tight. these hawks on the other hand, will come out loose as fck, flying around, knocking people out. its going to be a close knock down drag out, like all the other pat super bowls, (in which case you gotta take the way stronger defense and running game) or the hawks will flat crush them. pat's won't win big.

hawks gonna repeat on the last team to repeat.

don't feel as good as i did bout last year. but i think its the right bet. i'm in no hurry to bet as i think this could go to sea +2.5.

nothing matters man just bet

[paw]

Hawks get beat up in this game for sure. They have no offense power to contend with the Pats.

Pats win this game in a blowout for sure. We will be one of the worse super bowls on Record.

[James Marques]

Hawks get beat up in this game for sure. They have no offense power to contend with the Pats.

Pats win this game in a blowout for sure. We will be one of the worse super bowls on Record.

Guys like you said the exact same BS last year. And that game was a blowout... the other way.

[GunShard]

Hawks get beat up in this game for sure. They have no offense power to contend with the Pats.

Pats win this game in a blowout for sure. We will be one of the worse super bowls on Record.

You broke rule #4:

[sneakerhead]

take the Hawks ML... you'll be glad you did.

here's the deal.

i was all over ravens, plus the points, lil taste on the ML. The Ravens had the best front 7 i can recall in ages... they were really fcking good... but their back end was horrendous.

if their backend was at least OK, instead of horrendous, pat's are already out of the playoffs. Forsett ran the ball down their throats and they couldn't get pressure on Flacco. this defense can be had.

they couldn't run the ball for shit against the ravens. you can throw the ball 50 times against them, and have success, good luck trying that against the hawks. they're going to need to establish the run, but they won't be able to.

couple all that with the fact that i think these pat's, thanks to belly, who's such a nail bitter, are gonna come out tight. these hawks on the other hand, will come out loose as fck, flying around, knocking people out. its going to be a close knock down drag out, like all the other pat super bowls, (in which case you gotta take the way stronger defense and running game) or the hawks will flat crush them. pat's won't win big.

hawks gonna repeat on the last team to repeat.

don't feel as good as i did bout last year. but i think its the right bet. i'm in no hurry to bet as i think this could go to sea +2.5.

still think Baltimore's offense was much better than Seattles and Joe played a great game, dont think Russell will be able to replicate that performance against the Patriots secondary.

Guys like you said the exact same BS last year. And that game was a blowout... the other way.

Seattles offense has lost so many key players from last year, that comparison is invalid.

[SharkAA]

I'm thinking Patriots -3 @ +135 and/or Patriots -6,5 @ +210.

Seattle had so many problems putting Rodgers under pressure, so he could throw a ball out of bounds to avoid a sack. Instead, he had so much time to throw a ball and it's going to be the same with Tom Brady. With that being said, SEA secondary as good as it is, will have many problems against Amendola, LaFell, Edelman and especially Gronk. Throwing in a fact, that Belichick often comes up with great plays on the offense. On the other side, RW3 was constantly under pressure against Green Bay, sacked many times and I think it's going to be something similar against NE. Seattle is missing Tate&Harvin, Kearse&Baldwin are nowhere near their capabilities. They will make some good catches, but that's pretty much it, because they're too inconsistent. With that being said, SEA offense is going to struggle.

[Big Bear]

I'm thinking Patriots -3 @ +135 and/or Patriots -6,5 @ +210.

Seattle had so many problems putting Rodgers under pressure, so he could throw a ball out of bounds to avoid a sack. Instead, he had so much time to throw a ball and it's going to be the same with Tom Brady. With that being said, SEA secondary as good as it is, will have many problems against Amendola, LaFell, Edelman and especially Gronk. Throwing in a fact, that Belichick often comes up with great plays on the offense. On the other side, RW3 was constantly under pressure against Green Bay, sacked many times and I think it's going to be something similar against NE. Seattle is missing Tate&Harvin, Kearse&Baldwin are nowhere near their capabilities. They will make some good catches, but that's pretty much it, because they're too inconsistent. With that being said, SEA offense is going to struggle.

hey its just air right?

[Big Bear]

Yeah Seahawks had

" soooo many problems with the Packers offense"

Tell me how many games do you think the Packers are going to win where Rodgers throws for 177 yards and 3 INT's?

[SharkAA]

hey its just air right?

And your point here is...?

[Barnes & Whine]

1. Patriots first half ML

2. Hawks second half ML

<cite>New England Patriots win first half & Seattle Seahawks win in regulation</cite>
Sun 2/1		2003 NE HT & SEA FT		<input type="radio" id="radiox" value="M1_126" name="radiox" language="javascript" style="font-size: 1em; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);">+645

[cbiscuit]

5Dimes #1072 No score in first 14:30 @ +767 (0-0 after 1 qtr)
1st TD scorer M Lynch = +625
Intrtps Last TD scorer = James Devlin = 50-1
exact scores Sea or NE wins 23-16 - 200-1 !!!!!! Mistake?
" " " " " 26-23 = 175-1
The Easy money = Seattle to score rushing TD apprx -180 to -200

[Slanina]

15-6 in favor of Seattle on SBR? I'm all in on Pats!!

[slacker00]

still think Baltimore's offense was much better than Seattles and Joe played a great game, dont think Russell will be able to replicate that performance against the Patriots secondary.



Seattles offense has lost so many key players from last year, that comparison is invalid.

This year, Seattle's offense was ranked #8, Baltimore was #7. The only key loss was Tate.

[LT Profits]

I voted Seattle +1.5 in the poll, but my real life bet is Seattle -1 -101 (Heritage). I think Seattle wins so I am not concerned about a spread within 1.5 of Pick either way, so I think getting the -101 at Heritage is the best value out there right now unless you are lucky enough to play at a square book that still has Seahawks ML at + money.

[LT Profits]

Dang just realized I could have made multiple selections. I would have voted Under 48 too.

My real life bets are Seattle -1, Under 47.5 Game and Under 24 First Half.

[Celtics08]

Patiis

[LT Profits]

Patiis

Ironic with Russell avatar.

[Big Bear]

why the hell would anyone take Seattle +1.5???

take the ML if you like Seattle.

[LT Profits]

why the hell would anyone take Seattle +1.5???

take the ML if you like Seattle.

Best ML available now is -105. Even the -1 -101 at Heritage is gone.

[SXRD71]

Patis