This is according to two different sources that I'm monitoring. If this holds up the Patriots will lose. I will not be putting in a bet until 30 minutes before kickoff to get confirmation from where all the action is at.
-
-
LolComment -
Im sure the players are monitoring this also. I heard one of the teams wont show up depending on where all the action goes.Comment -
The difference is the Patriots have Tom Brady.
The Broncos had Peyton Manning.
Sharps were on the Seahawks last year and they know what they're doing this year as well.Comment -
Originally posted by Mister X
First off I took sea +2.5 for a cool mill last year. As soon as I made my bet the line dropped to1.5.
It does not take a sharp to know that peyton manning was doing shit all against that d.Comment -
Laker, not to be a dick because I dont know you, but how much did you take seattle for? A cool what?Comment -
These are the main reason the public is going to hammer New England early and maybe hold up until kickoff.
1) There's no way Tom Brady and Bilicheat loses 3 Super Bowl in a row
2) Bilicheat will be more determine then ever with deflate gate
3) Richard Sherman is hurt and Brady still hasn't forgotten "You Mad Bro"
And lastly,
4) The Seabags were lucky just to win their last game, they don't belong in the same stage with the big bad Patriots coming off a 45-7 destruction of the Colts win.Comment -
i don't care if new england wins.. nothing about me gambling wise will allow me to take them.. i just can't do it.Comment -
Who will stop Gronk?
Gronk will shit on Richard ShermanComment -
this move does kind of remind me of last year.Comment -
Originally posted by Rich Boy
they'll be alright dude.
this d is as good as last year, and how did jimmy graham do against them? their offense is worse, considerably, after losing Z. Miller, Tate, Harvin, then richardson in the divisional roundComment -
If Vegas want Seahawks win they winComment -
stupid comment.Originally posted by willydkComment -
It might be stupid but has Vegas ever lose?Comment -
Originally posted by lakerboy
LAKERBOY YOU HAVE TO POST YOUR TICKET OF THIS $1M WAGER YOU KEEP SAYING YOU *WON* no pics mean you did not bet??Comment -
All signs point to a Seahawks win.Comment -
Lakerboy is known for "air betting" on this forum.Originally posted by aston
Just take his comments with a grain of salt.Comment -
Yeah sunday. Every which way to sundayOriginally posted by willydk
Sea ml and gb cover
sea gb over
sea ne teaser
ne cover
ne & over teaser
theres an article out there how much one casino lost on just two nfl gamesComment -
If someone says they bet 5k ask for a ticket, if someone says they bet 1mil ignore them.Originally posted by astonComment -
"We're on to Arizona."Originally posted by willydkComment -
you dont have to worry bout that, he didnt bet. im sure he could prob post a fake ticket but he doesnt even bother doing that... 1 mil, lmfao..funny anyone even responds to that.Originally posted by astonComment -
His Name is Kam Chancelor and after a couple hits Gronk will be scared to catch anything across the middle.Originally posted by Rich BoyComment -
No they don't.Originally posted by WWCDComment -
Vegas usually wins either way (all those props). But yes, the worse side for them wins sometimes.Originally posted by willydkComment -
Last year is last year. Means shit.Originally posted by frostno98Comment -
The last 3 times the nfc conference game went to overtime, the winner of that game went on to win the super bowl. Giants beat green bay then ne, saints beat vikings then the colts, giants beat the 49ers and then ne.
All three times, the winner was the underdog in the super bowl.Comment -
Every post I read from OP makes me laughComment -
I will update you guys again next week. If it falls within 58-42 percent then I like NE. Right now it's around 80-20 percent New England. In last year Super Bowl, it was 72-28 Denver at kickoff. The public got buried again, as usual.Comment -
On what site do you find how the public is betting?Comment -
Found one.Comment -
I cant will myself for betting on NE.
True seattle isnt the same offense without harvin, a big factor, but I think the best thing that couldve happened to them was a piss-poor, 5 turnover game. They dont need big play receivers or offense. Just feed to Lynch, field position and let their defense set the table for their managable offense, which is exactly what Wilson does. They wont take anything or any possession for granted here. I just dont see how last year doesnt repeat its the same type of offense denver had. Seattle also plays every year in Arizona and does pretty well there, they are familiar with the venue, a small but notable advantage IMO.
I had put some on SEA at pick, put quickly cancelled it out day after losing a tiny bit of juice. Just wait until game game to get close to 3pts, because no matter what, public will drive this line up. As soon as it hits 3, I think the sharps will unload and may see close to pick again before kickoff.Comment -
You are looking at the wrong signs.Originally posted by d2betsComment -
He said a cool mil....which is about $20 in ghettospeakOriginally posted by sourtwist
Comment -
The 80/20 public percentage definitely is a warning sign in most scenarios and in this case I am not surprised to say the least. It is typical for public to overreact to scores in the Conference championship games and side with the dynasty that has won 3 Super Bowls with the same head coach in charge. Wow if it stays this way Vegas is in line to get buried hard or win like they did last year. I have to say, though that GB-SEA film is invaluable for someone like Belicheck because GB exposed SEA in many areas of that game.Comment -
"first off" lmfao he keeps trying to bring up that big air that no one believes or gives a shit aboutComment
