College Hoops Friday Night??

t-wizzle · 12-19-14, 11:47 AM

Originally posted by THam12

66% of money on zona... yet line moved to 6.

This just proves how stupid you are.

You think 66% of "money" would move a line in the opposite direction. What a dumbass.

Ted Sheckler · 12-19-14, 11:50 AM

Originally posted by stevegreazy

Can I ask why? Not disagreeing with you just trying to pick your mind a little bit.

If you think zona is going to win outright, wouldn't -260 be better than -310?

It's ok if you don't understand. No big deal.

stevegreazy · 12-19-14, 11:55 AM

Well I was hoping for a better explanation than that, but that'll do pig, that'll do.

THam12 · 12-19-14, 12:04 PM

Originally posted by t-wizzle

This just proves how stupid you are.

You think 66% of "money" would move a line in the opposite direction. What a dumbass.

You're a moron. Im saying its obvious there is RLM you titty head.

66% of money on one side yet the line moves the other way.

Dont talk t wiz. Just go hide.

THam12 · 12-19-14, 12:05 PM

Originally posted by Ted Sheckler

It's ok if you don't understand. No big deal.

You think payinf extra juice makes your bet better??? Im confused.

LT Profits · 12-19-14, 12:06 PM

Originally posted by THam12

You're a moron. Im saying its obvious there is RLM you titty head.

66% of money on one side yet the line moves the other way.

Dont talk t wiz. Just go hide.

No, 66% of the BETS are on Zona. But the bigger bets (i.e., more MONEY bet) is apparently on UTEP.

LT Profits · 12-19-14, 12:08 PM

And I think Ted is implying that -310 is a "safer" bet than -260, higher odds give him higher confidence level.

Ted Sheckler · 12-19-14, 12:08 PM

Originally posted by THam12

You think payinf extra juice makes your bet better??? Im confused.

Yes. I don't see how it confuses people though.

THam12 · 12-19-14, 12:09 PM

Originally posted by LT Profits

No, 66% of the BETS are on Zona. But the bigger bets (i.e., more MONEY bet) is apparently on UTEP.

Thats what i was implying, LT.
More "people" on zona but more money on UTEP.

THam12 · 12-19-14, 12:10 PM

Originally posted by Ted Sheckler

Yes. I don't see how it confuses people though.

You're risking more to win the same amount...

Ted Sheckler · 12-19-14, 12:10 PM

Originally posted by LT Profits

And I think Ted is implying that -310 is a "safer" bet than -260, higher odds give him higher confidence level.

What? that makes no sense. Now you've started to confuse me.

Ted Sheckler · 12-19-14, 12:11 PM

Originally posted by THam12

You're risking more to win the same amount...

Do you think I'm t-wizzle? I don't need you trolling me. go back to his thread and bother him with your nonsense.

THam12 · 12-19-14, 12:12 PM

Originally posted by Ted Sheckler

What? that makes no sense. Now you've started to confuse me.

There is nothing "better" about you paying that extra juice for the exact same bet other than the confidence factor as LT explained...

You have simply risked more money for the same return.

THam12 · 12-19-14, 12:13 PM

Originally posted by Ted Sheckler

Do you think I'm t-wizzle? I don't need you trolling me. go back to his thread and bother him with your nonsense.

Lmao im not trolling you.
I was asking a simple question as to why you thought your bet was better.

LT Profits · 12-19-14, 12:15 PM

Originally posted by THam12

Thats what i was implying, LT.
More "people" on zona but more money on UTEP.

Be careful with your wording, look what you wrote. "66% of the money is on Arizona."

You meant bets.

THam12 · 12-19-14, 12:17 PM

Originally posted by LT Profits

Be careful with your wording, look what you wrote. "66% of the money is on Arizona."

You meant bets.

Lol i couldn't figure out how to word it but knew what i meant! Internet problems.

Ted Sheckler · 12-19-14, 12:17 PM

Originally posted by THam12

Lmao im not trolling you.
I was asking a simple question as to why you thought your bet was better.

Whatever dude. good luck tonight.

THam12 · 12-19-14, 12:18 PM

Originally posted by Ted Sheckler

Whatever dude. good luck tonight.

Sorry for the confusion. Good luck to you.

LT Profits · 12-19-14, 12:20 PM

Originally posted by Ted Sheckler

Yea, maybe to you...I think -310 is a lock....-260 is too risky. Rather bet at -310.

Originally posted by LT Profits

And I think Ted is implying that -310 is a "safer" bet than -260, higher odds give him higher confidence level.

Ted, where is the contradiction in these two posts? I think I summed it up, what is so "confusing" about my interpretation? You used words "lock" and "risky", I used "safer" but I think we are saying same thing.

By the way I totally disagree with you, but that's another story altogether.

Ted Sheckler · 12-19-14, 12:27 PM

Originally posted by LT Profits

Ted, where is the contradiction in these two posts? I think I summed it up, what is so "confusing" about my interpretation? You used words "lock" and "risky", I used "safer" but I think we are saying same thing.

By the way I totally disagree with you, but that's another story altogether.

LT Profits, quit using your brain...You're making me think that this place isn't full of retards and there may be some hope afterall.

THam12 · 12-19-14, 12:28 PM

Originally posted by Ted Sheckler

LT Profits, quit using your brain...You're making me think that this place isn't full of retards and there may be some hope afterall.

LT Profits · 12-19-14, 12:30 PM

Originally posted by Ted Sheckler

LT Profits, quit using your brain...You're making me think that this place isn't full of retards and there may be some hope afterall.

Sorry.

t-wizzle · 12-19-14, 12:31 PM

Originally posted by LT Profits

No, 66% of the BETS are on Zona. But the bigger bets (i.e., more MONEY bet) is apparently on UTEP.

Exactly. Unfortunately THamburger12 doesn't understand this.

THam12 · 12-19-14, 12:35 PM

Originally posted by t-wizzle

Exactly. Unfortunately THamburger12 doesn't understand this.

Clearly you dont know how to read the rest of the thread, shit stain.

Can i see your 30% record please?

t-wizzle · 12-19-14, 12:41 PM

Originally posted by THam12

Clearly you dont know how to read the rest of the thread, shit stain.

Can i see your 30% record please?

Nice deflection.

You made an idiotic statement and can't own up to it. For fukk sake you even blamed it on "Internet problems."

Leave the discussion to the adults. Get back in your playpen hamburger.

THam12 · 12-19-14, 12:45 PM

Originally posted by t-wizzle

Nice deflection.

You made an idiotic statement and can't own up to it. For fukk sake you even blamed it on "Internet problems."

Leave the discussion to the adults. Get back in your playpen hamburger.

I did make a mistake and did own up to it?? I said "i knew what I meant but didnt word it correctly." And "internet problems" was a statement that meant that its harder to explain things through typing rather than through conversation.

Speaking of "owning up" to things... remember when you started a tracking thread and completely refused to actually post your plays and record IN THE FUKKIN thread? ?

Ted Sheckler · 12-19-14, 01:05 PM

Wizzle wins again...manages to turn a thread that has nothing to do with him into 20 posts about him. twizzle looking for attention and receiving more than he can accommodate. Well done wizzle.

THam12 · 12-19-14, 01:07 PM

Originally posted by Ted Sheckler

Wizzle wins again...manages to turn a thread that has nothing to do with him into 20 posts about him. twizzle looking for attention and receiving more than he can accommodate. Well done wizzle.

He obviously seeks attention. He doesnt get much at home.. must be tough.
poor fella.

Ted Sheckler · 12-19-14, 01:12 PM

Originally posted by THam12

He obviously seeks attention. He doesnt get much at home.. must be tough.
poor fella.

If I were him, I wouldn't want any at home...He gets too much online...I'm sure he's just satisfied with the admirers he has on a forum.

t-wizzle · 12-19-14, 01:25 PM

No I actually posted about a game tonight.

Go back and reread the thread. THamburger12 decided to make a joke of this thread by posting meaningless GIFs. Then he was wrong about the concept of RLM and used a flimsy excuse of "Internet problems."

THam12 · 12-19-14, 01:35 PM

Originally posted by t-wizzle

No I actually posted about a game tonight.

Go back and reread the thread. THamburger12 decided to make a joke of this thread by posting meaningless GIFs. Then he was wrong about the concept of RLM and used a flimsy excuse of "Internet problems."

I posted a gif that wasnt in anyway meaningless. It was a pounding. It was to help strengthen your post.
Its called "humor," if you dont understand it then you may want to loosen up.
Fukkin dingaling head.

And here you go continuing to not read what i say. "Internet problems" was not meaning my internet was a bad connection or anything of the sort.

Keep on dodging the fact that you lack transparency even when youre attempting to track your plays and "silence" haters. What are you so afraid of? Are you really that concerned with people mocking your losing picks that you wont even post and track them? Noone on this site is winning at a high rate. Grow some balls and actually prove people wrong, you fukkin vagina.

PaperTrail07 · 12-19-14, 01:42 PM

Cal is horrible this year Doubt they cover tonight

Originally posted by LT Profits

California -7.5

stevek173 · 12-19-14, 04:47 PM

Originally posted by Ted Sheckler

Yea, maybe to you...I think -310 is a lock....-260 is too risky. Rather bet at -310.

DigBick86 · 12-19-14, 05:09 PM

Have a monster play tonight JJ put verything you own in it!! It will hit

Stars-Flames o5.5 at even money

A value play if you wanna play it also

Bolts-devils o5.5 pays+120

Bishop out and nabokov in he has a savepercent under 90,kinkhaid in goal for the devils

stevek173 · 12-20-14, 10:37 AM

Originally posted by DigBick86

Have a monster play tonight JJ put verything you own in it!! It will hit

Stars-Flames o5.5 at even money

A value play if you wanna play it also

Bolts-devils o5.5 pays+120

Bishop out and nabokov in he has a savepercent under 90,kinkhaid in goal for the devils

both lost