You're an idiot if your not taking the Cardinals +185 tonight

[irishstuey]

Zona -3.5 +300. My only bet. .5u

[TheWhitePwny]

Anybody thinking just because this is a "MUST WIN" game for the cardinals indicates that they're going to win it is sadly mistaken... Cardinals who? the team that starts hot and shits the bed every single year? the team without a quarterback? the team that hasn't even been relevant since kurt warner lead them to an nfc championship? not really sure how a must win mentality is in play here... every team has must win games... most of them don't win them because most teams aren't capable... i'm not sure who convinced you that the cardinals are a team that must win anything...

[beavis13]

Just teased Rams +1/2 over 34 1/2

BOL Everyone

[Book Crook]

Well my sources say all sharp money is on the Rams... I am flipping here and going Rams

[Cookie Monster]

must win game for the cards with games against niners and seahawks and their +185? Hammer the Cardinals tonight they win an ugly one here line is at least 40-50 cents off.

Absolutely right!! +185 line was 40-50 cents off. Closing about +230

[TheWhitePwny]

^^ lmao... guess it's off a point now

[GunShard]

Nice prediction.

[TwoWays]

All u Rams backers truly are punks! Take it as a lesson. Don't be punk bitches.

[blackHIPPY]

All u Rams backers truly are punks! Take it as a lesson. Don't be punk bitches.

lmao

[WoopTdo]

That worked out well, did a little tease that I figured would be a winner. Put that into the moneyline and then some nice live plays and it turned into a good evening. Thank you Rams for beating up on the Redskins and Raiders!

[red12sox]

Had cardinals +11 and under 46 teaser. Good night.

[Big Bear]

Zona more than capable of winning this game and line movement is not going to have any impact on what happens on the field.

I swear some of you guys make this shit harder than it needs to be.

line movement means nothing. Put the tin foil hats away fellas

[new era]

Line indicates rams win easily.

Your idiocy indicates that its a must bet on the Cards.

[new era]

Had cardinals +11 and under 46 teaser. Good night.

LOL you tease over/under? What a chump.

[Book Crook]

God damn it! This is why you listen to yourself and not everyone else. Got talked right into Rams against my own judgement.

[Big Bear]

God damn it! This is why you listen to yourself and not everyone else. Got talked right into Rams against my own judgement.

always trust your gut.

I didnt bet the game but i was shocked to see so many poster praising the Rams going into this game...

pretty crazy to fade a 9-3 team with a team that has already been eliminated from the playoffs

[red12sox]

LOL you tease over/under? What a chump.

Yea? Whats wrong with that? Pretty sure it was a winner chump...

[SmittyZ28]

This is the play

U20 1H

and

01] ARI CARDINALS +10½-110 (B+6)
[302] TOTAL u46½-110 (B+6)
(ARI CARDINALS vrs STL RAMS)

[LT Profits]

Wow, surprised at how well Zona defense played considering all their injuries, that was the difference in the game. Rams defense did its part. Oh well, it's just one game, NEXT!

[TheWhitePwny]

its funny how you can be on 4 different IPs and 3 diff accounts over the course of 5 different years and the same losers are still here losing...

[teaserpleaser]

Anybody thinking just because this is a "MUST WIN" game for the cardinals indicates that they're going to win it is sadly mistaken... Cardinals who? the team that starts hot and shits the bed every single year? the team without a quarterback? the team that hasn't even been relevant since kurt warner lead them to an nfc championship? not really sure how a must win mentality is in play here... every team has must win games... most of them don't win them because most teams aren't capable... i'm not sure who convinced you that the cardinals are a team that must win anything...

what the fkk does this bullshit even mean?

[freakydave]

God damn it! This is why you listen to yourself and not everyone else. Got talked right into Rams against my own judgement.

good advice - trust yourself

[Eagles73]

must win game for the cards with games against niners and seahawks and their +185? Hammer the Cardinals tonight they win an ugly one here line is at least 40-50 cents off.

and the cardinals win an ugly game indeed. Can't wait to get my first infraction for giving out winners and outing the crooked mods working for the books.

[jjgold]

Eagles watch your back here

Do not make habit of giving nice winners like this

enjoy your stay

[LT Profits]

and the cardinals win an ugly game indeed. Can't wait to get my first infraction for giving out winners and outing the crooked mods working for the books.

Dude, there is nothing crooked here, still +18.40 YTD and over 58% in NFL this season.

[PAYTON20]

Can't believe you can get Cards +13 and Under 48 right now in a teaser

That's the play!

Easiest money ever

[mitch51]

and the cardinals win an ugly game indeed. Can't wait to get my first infraction for giving out winners and outing the crooked mods working for the books.

They won't give you an infraction. I understand their business model, as I have an MBA. I totally agree with you regarding this. It's a huge conflict of interest, no matter what anyone in here says. It reminds me of the goddamn government when you think about it. Monsanto equals the sportsbooks.

[LT Profits]

They won't give you an infraction. I understand their business model, as I have an MBA. I totally agree with you regarding this. It's a huge conflict of interest, no matter what anyone in here says. It reminds me of the goddamn government when you think about it. Monsanto equals the sportsbooks.

Seems you have been here two years, that should be long enough for you to know that whatever thoughts I post in the forum are MY thoughts and my thoughts alone. Remember I have been a writer on the front page since shortly after the inception of SBR way back when, so objectivity is obviously important to me when I do my writeups.

[Tony Truong]

Line indicates rams win easily.

Easyly lose too . !

[mitch51]

Seems you have been here two years, that should be long enough for you to know that whatever thoughts I post in the forum are MY thoughts and my thoughts alone. Remember I have been a writer on the front page since shortly after the inception of SBR way back when, so objectivity is obviously important to me when I do my writeups.

Are you saying that if you have a business that has a goal of reviewing sportsbooks AND has moderators giving out free picks to clients that have accounts at these same sportsbooks is not a conflict of interest? I'm not talking about you personally, just your model. I'm not minimizing what you are saying, just that I know a blatant conflict of interest when I see it. It's like a judge who has stock in private prisons sentencing pot smokers to jail. Or, are you saying that SBR doesn't have a relationship with any sportsbooks? I have been here and watching this for two years, you're correct. And I do like SBR or I wouldn't be here. But the conflict is obvious.

[Brian891]

cards clinched playoff spot unless eagles and cowboys tie.

[WWCD]

It doesn't matter if someone here posted 75% winners. Gamblers find a way to be down units, even if they have a winning percentage. Most gamblers will bury themselves because they chase losses. Not everyone has the stamina to play smart for the entire season. I am guilty of this as well, but I improve every year.

Personally, my problem is playing parlays. I know in the long run there isn't a bright future in them. If I didn't hit a nice one every now and then, I wouldn't play them.

[LT Profits]

Are you saying that if you have a business that has a goal of reviewing sportsbooks AND has moderators giving out free picks to clients that have accounts at these same sportsbooks is not a conflict of interest? I'm not talking about you personally, just your model. I'm not minimizing what you are saying, just that I know a blatant conflict of interest when I see it. It's like a judge who has stock in private prisons sentencing pot smokers to jail. Or, are you saying that SBR doesn't have a relationship with any sportsbooks? I have been here and watching this for two years, you're correct. And I do like SBR or I wouldn't be here. But the conflict is obvious.

I personally couldn't care less what readers do with my picks, they could bet them (or fade them) with books not sponsored by SBR for all I care. That part of the business is not my concern.

[THam12]

Are you saying that if you have a business that has a goal of reviewing sportsbooks AND has moderators giving out free picks to clients that have accounts at these same sportsbooks is not a conflict of interest? I'm not talking about you personally, just your model. I'm not minimizing what you are saying, just that I know a blatant conflict of interest when I see it. It's like a judge who has stock in private prisons sentencing pot smokers to jail. Or, are you saying that SBR doesn't have a relationship with any sportsbooks? I have been here and watching this for two years, you're correct. And I do like SBR or I wouldn't be here. But the conflict is obvious.

Wah. Of course SBR has certain books it promotes more than other.
You thinking LT is trying to manipulate our minds to help books is fukkin stupid. You think that SBR posters generate enough revenue for books for them to give a shit? No. We are peobably <1%.

[mitch51]

Wah. Of course SBR has certain books it promotes more than other.
You thinking LT is trying to manipulate our minds to help books is fukkin stupid. You think that SBR posters generate enough revenue for books for them to give a shit? No. We are peobably <1%.

Lol, one more person lacking a high school diploma.