How many of you started Jonas Gray on your fantasy team?

[Kermit]

Unreal.

He'll be a hot pickup on Wednesday.

[Mr KLC]

The thing that bothers me about Patriots players (other than Brady) is that they can be awesome one week, and then totally irrelevant, fantasy wise, the next 3 weeks.

[Jeffie]

I needed a win this week badly, and lost because I played against him.

[gregmav1]

I didn't, but I did pick him +300 to get a TD today for a nice chunk of change. Lots of carries last week, figured he'd get a few goal line shots today.

The odds of him getting 3 or more was probably 100/1.

[DrunkHorseplayer]

It'd be foolish to pick him up now.

[marcoloco]

If your starting RB was Jonas Gray then your team is in bad shape

[byronbb]

The thing that bothers me about Patriots players (other than Brady) is that they can be awesome one week, and then totally irrelevant, fantasy wise, the next 3 weeks.

Everyone knows this except the OP.

[jjgold]

never heard of him
Brady makes everyone good period

[LT Profits]

I have him on one of my teams but did not start him. He may squeeze out a flex start for me next week, we shall see.

[KiDBaZkiT]

I have him on one of my teams but did not start him. He may squeeze out a flex start for me next week, we shall see.

wtf? With all your fantasy spam you still didnt start the guy???

[LT Profits]

wtf? With all your fantasy spam you still didnt start the guy???

I started Jamaal Charles and Joique Bell so did OK.

[LT Profits]

wtf? With all your fantasy spam you still didnt start the guy???

And define "fantasy spam"? Face it, fantasy sports (ESPECIALLY Football) has become extremely relevant since it has been deemed legal, there is nothing spammy about it.

[Grits n' Gravy]

never heard of him
Brady makes everyone good period

Brady played like shit last night. Gray and the OL had everything to do with last night's strong ground game.

[KiDBaZkiT]

And define "fantasy spam"? Face it, fantasy sports (ESPECIALLY Football) has become extremely relevant since it has been deemed legal, there is nothing spammy about it.

No doubt. So would it be possible designate a section to it and not clog it up in PT?

[LT Profits]

No doubt. So would it be possible designate a section to it and not clog it up in PT?

And the Fantasy Forum is exactly where I put all my fantasy-relevant threads. The only ones that get copied to PT are those with significant injury news or any news that may be considered important to, you know, BETTORS?

[Spedizzo]

I have LaFell, Vereen, Edelman, and Gronk

I know it is stupid to have so many players from the same team start, but I pretty much had the week won since my opponent's team pooped the bed with players from the early games so I started all of them figuring the game would be a shoot out forcing Brady to throw to Edelman, Gronk, LaFell, etc

I start all 4 of these guys, and not 1 touchdown from any of them

I still am winning the week, and everyone except LaFell had a decent game, but I could have used more points down the stretch

Lacy and AJ Green helped me this week

[BigPage25]

I'm 3-8 in my fantasy league...

[Wrigley]

But was this a one game wonder you never know with BNB running the show

[Vinnie Paz]

Some guy has his on the bench in my league. Next week he'll start him and he'll get 8 carries for 32 yards

[jjgold]

Fantasy football so hard now because of all the injuries

[infamousbacardi]

I added Gray in a dynasty league after Ridley went down, then dropped him when he only had 12 carries and 33 yards then went on Bye Week and I needed the space. Also have Ridley and Vereen.

Really thought and still do think that Vereen may be pretty relevant there with some carries. I mean, 38 carries in one game? That's just stupid. That is more carries then he had in his previous 3 games where he had touches after Ridley's injury (31).

Can't predict that, in particular with the hoodie running the show. Now he'll probably get 13-15 carries for 40 yards each of the next 2 weeks...