Originally posted by LT Profits
I Would Not Be Shocked if Jaguars Beat the Redskins This Week
Collapse
X
-
slacker00SBR Posting Legend
- 10-06-05
- 12262
#36Yikes. Please share why you like the Jags, I didn't see much from them in the loss @PHI except a few isolated plays.Comment -
LT ProfitsSBR Aristocracy
- 10-27-06
- 90963
#37Did you even read this thread? I think both teams are about equally bad. Even giving Skins a slight edge for being home, +220 seems like +EV to me.Originally posted by slacker00Yikes. Please share why you like the Jags, I didn't see much from them in the loss @PHI except a few isolated plays.Comment -
slacker00SBR Posting Legend
- 10-06-05
- 12262
#38I'm not quite as down on WAS. As long as RGIII doesn't have 2 broken legs, they'll figure out a way to use him.Originally posted by LT ProfitsDid you even read this thread? I think both teams are about equally bad. Even giving Skins a slight edge for being home, +220 seems like +EV to me.Comment -
LT ProfitsSBR Aristocracy
- 10-27-06
- 90963
#39But they are NOT using him right, forcing him to be a pocket passer that he is not. And the loss of Reed is huge, they have nobody else close to the stretch TE that he is, not to mention RG3 likes throwing to him.Originally posted by slacker00I'm not quite as down on WAS. As long as RGIII doesn't have 2 broken legs, they'll figure out a way to use him.Comment -
slacker00SBR Posting Legend
- 10-06-05
- 12262
#40Reed isn't that much of an impact, they've got receivers that can stretch the field. As for RGIII, I expect adjustments.Originally posted by LT ProfitsBut they are NOT using him right, forcing him to be a pocket passer that he is not. And the loss of Reed is huge, they have nobody else close to the stretch TE that he is, not to mention RG3 likes throwing to him.Comment -
k13SBR Posting Legend
- 07-16-10
- 18129
#41Redskins easy...
Good spot for them.Comment -
LT ProfitsSBR Aristocracy
- 10-27-06
- 90963
#42Reed is his favorite target.Originally posted by slacker00Reed isn't that much of an impact, they've got receivers that can stretch the field. As for RGIII, I expect adjustments.Comment -
LT ProfitsSBR Aristocracy
- 10-27-06
- 90963
#43Originally posted by k13Redskins easy...
Good spot for them.
Based on what? The only difference between these teams this year from last year is that the Jags have a better defense, especially the front seven. That wasn't evident vs. the Philly fast-break offense, but should become apparent vs. the Deadskins.
Comment -
pavyracerSBR Aristocracy
- 04-12-07
- 82654
#44Why would you be shocked LT? Redskins only won 3 games last year.Comment -
Dollars2DonutsSBR Hall of Famer
- 02-07-13
- 8803
#45I may not bet the game, but the edge (imo) definitely goes to the Jags. The Redskins are a mess in too many ways to mention, and that is without even into doing a deep dive into the stats, which also indicate the the Jags can easily be in this game.Comment -
LT ProfitsSBR Aristocracy
- 10-27-06
- 90963
#46And yet it seems others disagree.Originally posted by pavyracerWhy would you be shocked LT? Redskins only won 3 games last year.Comment -
slacker00SBR Posting Legend
- 10-06-05
- 12262
#47@HOU Garcon had 10 catches, DeSean had 8, Paul had 4, 5 others had a catch or more. RGIII has plenty of targets.Originally posted by LT ProfitsReed is his favorite target.Comment -
Dollars2DonutsSBR Hall of Famer
- 02-07-13
- 8803
#48It's too bad that he outperformed his abilities in year #1. I laughed when people said that RG3 had a similar or higher ceiling to Andrew Luck that whole year. The truth is that players with RG3's abilities do not translate into long term solutions for their teams.....add to it the injury issues and the way he was mishandled last year and it all equals a recipe for disaster.Originally posted by slacker00@HOU Garcon had 10 catches, DeSean had 8, Paul had 4, 5 others had a catch or more. RGIII has plenty of targets.
IN 3 years (or less) RG3 will not be in the NFL (and I said he had a shelf life of 5 years after his first year.....it is still true).
Not that that all means that they will not win this week.....you never know anything for sure in this league.Comment -
STAXSBR MVP
- 11-01-13
- 3718
#49Jacksonville is a better team than Washington, I wouldnt be surprised if they won eitherComment -
LT ProfitsSBR Aristocracy
- 10-27-06
- 90963
#50Yeah because Reed was injured after his first catch.Originally posted by slacker00@HOU Garcon had 10 catches, DeSean had 8, Paul had 4, 5 others had a catch or more. RGIII has plenty of targets.
He is RG3's security blanket.
Comment -
Da Manster!SBR Posting Legend
- 07-13-07
- 17596
#51If the Redskins are smart, they will start Kirk Cousins ASAP....then you will see a totally different team!...
....unfortunately for us skins fans, that probably won't happen any time soon barring injury!...
Comment -
STAXSBR MVP
- 11-01-13
- 3718
#52its bc you have a dipshit owner who is maiking things worse by being stubborn... Snyder just isnt ready to admit he made a grave mistake in trading the franchise's future for RG3... The thing is, its not RG3's fault. Shanny ruined him in his rookie year. Once RG3 gets benched (and he will get benched probably later rather than sooner), RG3 will come out in the media slamming Shanny for ruining him. Its just his styleOriginally posted by Da Manster!If the Redskins are smart, they will start Kirk Cousins ASAP....then you will see a totally different team!...
....unfortunately for us skins fans, that probably won't happen any time soon barring injury!...
Comment -
k13SBR Posting Legend
- 07-16-10
- 18129
#53Based on the line, line movement, hfa, last week, public dog, etc.Originally posted by LT Profits
Based on what? The only difference between these teams this year from last year is that the Jags have a better defense, especially the front seven. That wasn't evident vs. the Philly fast-break offense, but should become apparent vs. the Deadskins.Comment -
LT ProfitsSBR Aristocracy
- 10-27-06
- 90963
#54Line has gone DOWN, opened +6.5. HFA has meant nothing to Skins since last year. I don't get what you mean by "last week", that seems like a wash as neither team looked good.Originally posted by k13Based on the line, line movement, hfa, last week, public dog, etc.Comment -
k13SBR Posting Legend
- 07-16-10
- 18129
#55When it dropped to -5.5 it got bet up to -6...some resistance...
Anyway, they might cover but don't think they win, just the way I see it.Comment -
k13SBR Posting Legend
- 07-16-10
- 18129
Comment -
pavyracerSBR Aristocracy
- 04-12-07
- 82654
#57Wow 18 people think Redskins have a chance to cover a TD. Speechless!Comment -
k13SBR Posting Legend
- 07-16-10
- 18129
#58Not even a chance..Comment -
blankoblancoSBR MVP
- 11-18-11
- 3456
#59Yeah... that's why you don't put your money on this team. Tried to warn you guys. The Jags offense/offensive line situation is a trainwreck. I watch all this crappy teams' games so you don't have to
Kirk Cousins getting to play might have screwed up the under (which I was also on) but I doubt it made a difference in Skins coveringComment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code
