So who the penetrate is winning now
-
Comment -
How many times does it have to be said?Originally posted by BiTeMe UsAdOj
1) No one... and I mean, NO ONE (ok, maybe out-to-lunch no1here) is buying that. Your actions/words reveal your agenda.
2) You mischaracterize (lie even) things regarding me all the time. Trying to paint my poker chat as malicious, for example previously, when next to everyone knows it's not. They know it's not because ... *drumroll* ... they've played with me. There is no 'massaging my ego' (
), they KNOW you're mischaracterizing. They KNOW this.
You just continue to insult others by continually implying I have some Svengali-like influence over other peeps.
3) In just this thread alone, you've mischaracterized things (and don't think others haven't noticed). For example. you said I claimed to have won the tourney based on that QQ hand, when, in fact, what I actually said was: others would have gone busto with that hand. No "diety like standards" implied, you once-again-mischaracterizing-dope! In fact, what I actually said is demonstrably proven to be CORRECT -- dare went busto in the hand! Stop being squirrelly you mischaracterizing dink.
3) Oh yeah, you congratulated me
... only AFTER going on incessantly about how lucky I was blah blah blah. Who you zoomin, Mr. Disingenuous?
4) Speakin of temper tantrums: When I first arrived on the SBR scene, you were somewhat 'famous' for your forum meltdowns and subsequent tail-tween-your-legs-to-save-face open forum apologies. Next to legendary (in the forum sense). Peeps remember that. Hell, I remember the pm apology ya sent me. BOTTOM LINE: *You* are one of the last guys round here that should be bloviating on the concept of temper tantrums. You have zero credibility in that regard.
5) You, konck and various others routinely try to diminish my poker accomplishments round here. I defend myself. Peeps that really know me round here know I'm humble and don't have a big ego. You try to mischaracterize that, as well. Like I previously have stated, I know SBR poker ain't much, but seeing I'm in NY and have shitty online options (can't deposit/withdraw on Bovada, either) well, in between casino runs I get my poker fix here. I LOVE the game.
I have readily admitted I am far from perfect. You on the other hand have extreme difficulty in conceding you make mistakes or win a tourney mainly because of a lucky hand. Everyone saw it, everyone knows that was the critical hand for you in that tourney.
You descend into personal insults and name calling in a reaction to someone saying you are a luckbox or are exhibiting delusional behavior. Yes I tease you when you hit post all in 332 to 1 shots or running straights, but I have said numerous times you are a talented poker player.
You can deflect and attack me all you want, like I keep saying I am not the one acting like everything I do is perfect, but it is irrelevant to the question, "Was that lucky hand the main reason you won the tourney?" It doesn't matter whether it was or not really.
What's matters is can you put down the narcissism crack pipe and take an important step into reality? I hope you can, but you have to want it for yourselfComment -
The US is winning solidly right now by my records:Originally posted by daneblazer
Monday Tuesday CDN CONF USA WOR CDN CONF USA WOR 12pm 1 2 3 4 2 3 4 1 1pm 3 2 1 4 2 3 1 4 2pm 4 2 3 1 2 4 3 1 3pm 1 2 3 4 2 3 1 4 4pm 4 3 1 2 DNP 3 2 1 5pm 4 1 3 2 4 2 3 1 6pm 1 2 3 4 4 2 3 1 7pm 4 3 1 2 2 3 1 4 8pm 3 4 1 2 4 2 1 3 9pm 2 4 1 3 1 3 2 4 10pm DNP 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 11pm 3 2 1 4 1 4 3 2 #1 3 1 7 1 2 0 5 5 #2 1 6 0 5 5 3 2 2 Totals 7 8 14 7 9 3 12 12 CDN 16 CONF 11 USA 26 WOR 19 Comment -
Thanks for the update beerdog!Comment -
Thanks, BD.
Comment -
Centaur... you can make up shit all you want (thinks he's perfect, can't admit mistakes, narcissism crack pipe blah blah insert more centy pseudo psychological bullshit here blah) BUT, I'm totally confident the intelligent peeps round here can see the REAL DEALIO.
FFS, the last time you tried peddling this horseshit I proved you WRONG in the very same thread.
I apologized for being wrong & misinterpreting bobby's post regarding those tech-problem tourneys. FACT
Who's the delusional one?
Maybe you always wanted to be a psychologist but couldn't cut the academics required and think some affirmative action guy swiped your spot; hell, I don't know. All I know for certain is you think you're smarter than you are. Oh, your smart... but not so smart that you have a clue of what you're talking about regarding me.
So... GL in your tourney today and I'm sure if you win it'll be your great playing & if I win another one today... I'm nuthin but a luckbox.
Carry on, champ.Comment -
Confederates with one win? OuchComment -
Isnt that how it always is around here though? Or even with poker in general? Especially with rec players. They win and they played a brilliant tournament and think they're the second coming of Phil Galfond. Lose and it's always a suck out some donkey had or rigged shit hole software. You never hear "man I got outplayed and fukkin owned in that hand! I played like shit in that tournament."Originally posted by BiTeMe UsAdOj
Comment -
What a remarkable showing by Team USA
Comment -
Hear ya, daner
I feel I'm very good at analyzing my play and know when I've played well or not-so-well (contrary to centy's pseudo-psychological analysis of me).
Specific to the tourney in question here, I feel I played very well and the main reason I won was not b/c of what centy says, but b/c of an accumulation of things I did rather well.
As we know, poker is a game of skill and luck; there isn't a tournament that existed or ever will exist where luck isn't a factor.Comment -
Don't need to be a psychologist or even intelligent to recognize your delusions regarding that tourneyOriginally posted by BiTeMe UsAdOjCentaur... you can make up shit all you want (thinks he's perfect, can't admit mistakes, narcissism crack pipe blah blah insert more centy pseudo psychological bullshit here blah) BUT, I'm totally confident the intelligent peeps round here can see the REAL DEALIO.
FFS, the last time you tried peddling this horseshit I proved you WRONG in the very same thread. I apologized for being wrong & misinterpreting bobby's post regarding those tech-problem tourneys. FACT
Who's the delusional one?
Maybe you always wanted to be a psychologist but couldn't cut the academics required and think some affirmative action guy swiped your spot; hell, I don't know. All I know for certain is you think you're smarter than you are. Oh, your smart... but not so smart that you have a clue of what you're talking about regarding me.
So... GL in your tourney today and I'm sure if you win it'll be your great playing & if I win another one today... I'm nuthin but a luckbox.
Carry on, champ.
You hit that AQ and everyone commented how lucky that was but instead of acknowledging lady luck smiled upon you, you started talking about level 1 hands and bluffs and how you were so great to still be in that position. Don't forget to cite your skillful computer logon to even be registered and dexterous use of a mouse to properly fold, raise, etc.
That "apology" with bobbywaves was clearly done as a result of and after I discussed your problems with acknowledging mistakes or imperfections. The word "misinterpretation" was sneakily inserted in that apology to make it ambiguous as to whether it was your mistake or something poorly written by Bobbywaves.
You can call me stupid, a fool, nitwit, etc. all you want. I on the other hand am not trying to insult you, I am just pointing out to you rather fruitlessly that you are not always right
Done talking about it, glComment -
Originally posted by TheCentaur
WOW! In the DELUSIONAL FORUM OLYMPICS, this above post of yours scores a perfect 10.
We's gotz ourselves our own lil Nadia Comaneci of delusional posting here.
CONGRATS!
I mean, really and sincerely, there is so much WRONG with what you say in the above I'll just chalk it up to you resorting to trolling at this point. Thought you were better than this but damn, I was sure wrong about that.
Carry on, champ.Comment -
Originally posted by BiTeMe UsAdOjWOW! In the DELUSIONAL FORUM OLYMPICS, this above post of yours scores a perfect 10.
We's gotz ourselves our own lil Nadia Comaneci of delusional posting here.
CONGRATS!
I mean, really and sincerely, there is so much WRONG with what you say in the above I'll just chalk it up to you resorting to trolling at this point. Thought you were better than this but damn, I was sure wrong about that.
Carry on, champ.
Comment -
Carry on, champOriginally posted by TheCentaurComment -
Obviously its all riggedComment -
As a superuser, I can 100% confirm that analysisOriginally posted by downsouthComment -
ObviouslyOriginally posted by downsouthComment -
Well duh!Originally posted by GUMMO77Comment -
i like our odds in the 1 pm eastern
lineup:
oneunder
real Madrid
ballahollic
autodonk
new team strategy, play 2 players in half the trnys, collude and take down 1-2!!!!
team confeds, pullin out all the stops!!!!!Comment -
Donk even bobbywaves has put up pts for his team...Sad dayComment -
and people in hell no longer need ice water, as it has frozen over.........Originally posted by ChipupComment -
nothing but luck for USA all week, yesterday it was A-q vs my A-k, day before I was ahead also when taken out
now this donkey gonna run his mouth on how good he played having his one move
Seat 2 (playing) : no1here_conf, amount $1040, amount bet $0, penalty (None)
Seat 3 (playing) : BiTeMeUsAdOj_usa, amount $4960, amount bet $0, penalty (None)
BiTeMeUsAdOj_usa: Small Blind ($75)
no1here_conf: Big Blind ($150)
** Dealing Down Cards **
Dealt to no1here_conf: [9d, Jh]
BiTeMeUsAdOj_usa: Raise ($300)
no1here_conf: Raise [btn] ($1040)
BiTeMeUsAdOj_usa: Call ($740)
no1here_conf: Show Cards ($0)
BiTeMeUsAdOj_usa: Show Cards ($0)
** Dealing Flop **
Community cards: [3c, 2c, Qd]
** Dealing Turn **
Community cards: [Ts]
** Dealing River **
Community cards: [6d]
** End Round **
** Evaluate **
no1here_conf: Show Cards ($0)
BiTeMeUsAdOj_usa: Show Cards ($0)
** Showdown **
Main pot $2080, Rake $0
Summary no1here_conf: bet $1190, won $0, net $-1190
Summary BiTeMeUsAdOj_usa: bet $1115, won $2080, net $965, HoleCards [Jd, 3d], HiHand [a pair of threes] [3d, 3c, Qd, Jd, Ts], won $2080 from main potComment -
Conspicuously missing: the hands where Bite outplayed you and went from half your stack to 5x your stackOriginally posted by no1here
Nobody's folding any 2 there. Might wanna brush up on poker theory, or maybe don't play against guys who've got you pinned down as a scammer...must be intimidating
Comment -
It was a tough fight, you both played wellOriginally posted by no1hereComment -
no1 I actually wasn't gonna say anything but being you brought things up:
Anyone watching that tourney saw how I outplayed you.
You started HU w/ a big chip lead on me.
Someone that knew what they were doing shoulda won.
You were the transparent All-In monkey... so ... strategically, I just patiently waited for you to walk into me.
Like a good player does... and in which you did.
I won b/c I'm way better @ poker than you... FACT
You can point to this last hand but anyone that knows anything bout poker can look @ stack sizes there and figure out the rest. Like I said, I wasn't gonna say anything, but this PROVES what I was saying earlier in thread bout you having an agenda and being a bitter old few-brain-cells not-a-man-of-his-word geezer that's just pissed cuz Trip and I called you out for your STIFFING.
You were, in the famous words of bigblue.... OuTPlAyed
Now go take your metamucil and enjoy your afternoon poop you clueless poker monkey!!!
Comment
