Books Cleaned Up This Superbowl

[Seaweed]

[DwightShrute]

Seattle and the over they needed so I would say so.

[Smoke]

Small shops will stay open longer

The big books really cleaned up

Faster payouts now

[pavyracer]

All my friends had Seattle and over. I'm glad the books cleaned up so we can get paid fast.

[kmarinouofm]

Books needed the under but Seattle winning outright helped big time. That last garbage td sucked

[freakydave]

All my friends had Seattle and over. I'm glad the books cleaned up so we can get paid fast.

sea ml for me

[thetrinity]

should have been big score for books. the total hitting the tease window didnt help them, neither did the safety.

[DarkNite]

Big win for books. Majority was on Denver ML and - points.

[LosDoyers]

A lot of suckers out there. Don't you learn by high school that a #1 defense always beats the #1 offense. I'll admit, Peyton's record year and overall career (I still consider him GOAT) had me a little anxious about betting Seattle. But when you factor in EVERYTHING, it was a no brainer.

[Eddy Munny]

The books effectively gambled on this game themselves with how they handled the line movement. They did not cave when the Denver money came pouring in. They were not seeking to balance the money out. They put their chips on Seattle and were confident it was the right side. They were correct.

[Hot Jerry]

Books and Bookies LOVE a guys like u !!

[Eddy Munny]

Guys like who? I had both Seattle and the Over.

[thecattery12]

Everyone should've cleaned up on the red hot chili peppers to go shirtless.

[Eddy Munny]

Everyone should've cleaned up on the red hot chili peppers to go shirtless.

Kiedis is ageless. I hope I can look that good shirtless when I'm in my 50's. No homo

[cruzing vato]

Congrats books.. they should have moved the line to 3 or 4 and put the seahawks at -125. That would have made more sense than den -1 -125. I dunno.

[easyliving]

Everyone should've cleaned up on the red hot chili peppers to go shirtless.

what was the line on yes?

[sandyw123]

public
Yes, they did - as usual. The best thing to do in most cases is to bet against the public.

[OTL]

Yup they sure did. Congrats to fellow Seahawks and over backers.

[SteelRain]

Sharps also cleaned up huge. The is a reason why the line closed at +1 hawks at pinny.

[thecattery12]

what was the line on yes?

As high as +170. I got on at +124

[packerd_00]

A lot of suckers out there. Don't you learn by high school that a #1 defense always beats the #1 offense. I'll admit, Peyton's record year and overall career (I still consider him GOAT) had me a little anxious about betting Seattle. But when you factor in EVERYTHING, it was a no brainer.

That Denver Defense was terrible,give them there credit.

[SBR_John]

Mayweathers loss helped. Lot of sharp money burned in props and on Den.

[TonyTall]

Mayweathers loss helped. Lot of sharp money burned in props and on Den.

tons of unders hit on player props. books probably got a good chunk of change here

overs:
D.thomas (public was on under cause of sherman)
W.Welker
D.Baldwin
J.Kearse (who bet this)

unders:
manning
wilson
tate
miller
harvin
J.thomas
moreno
tamme
decker
beast mode

[You mad bro]

i hit 5 prop bets last night .. all 5 prop bets had absolutely nothing to do with the actual game

national anthem
coin toss (heads or tails)
will renee fleming wear gloves
chili peppers shirtless
winner of the coin toss

[stepanekslips]

i hit 5 prop bets last night .. all 5 prop bets had absolutely nothing to do with the actual game

national anthem
coin toss (heads or tails)
will renee fleming wear gloves
chili peppers shirtless
winner of the coin toss

So what odds did you get on winner of the coin toss?

[You mad bro]

So what odds did you get on winner of the coin toss?

heads and tails both were -105

winner was -105 on both teams

my local didn't want to give plus odds on those .. but he did have higher + odds on some big numbers

safety in the game i saw was +550 and he offered +750
Super Bowl decided by exactly 7 points i saw online was +750 and my local offered +900
overtime i saw was +600 and he offered +700

didn't play any of those though

[jjgold]

betpoints book cleaned up too

Posters for the most part got buried

[BigdaddyQH]

The books in Vegas had a bit more money on Denver and the Under, but would have made a profit none the less. This is why the line never moved during the last week of action. Everyone seemed comfortable with the 2 1/2 point spread. Now we can get rid of the air bettors in here and concentrate on 2014. Just a reminder to those who said that they would stay out if Denver loses. We do NOT want to see your a**es in here again. Got it?

[dfish]

betpoints book cleaned up too

Posters for the most part got buried

Is this true?

I mean look @ the top 5 bet points winners . . .

[SBR_John]

2d half Den chasers flamed. All of the Manning props flamed.

Not many were positioned to take advantage of a Denver offensive melt down.

[Cuse0323]

2d half Den chasers flamed. All of the Manning props flamed.

Not many were positioned to take advantage of a Denver offensive melt down.

Good point about the 2H. Same goes for live lines, the majority who were gonna mess with live lines had to jump on Denver. Books must of made a killing as any live line for the Broncos went down in flames.

[RonPaul2008]

I hope that means no major books will go under anytime soon.

[RonPaul2008]

betpoints book cleaned up too

Posters for the most part got buried

I doubt that with the Seattle special line.

[pavyracer]

Sharps like myself got richer and squares like jjgold got poorer.

[TheLock]

The books effectively gambled on this game themselves with how they handled the line movement. They did not cave when the Denver money came pouring in. They were not seeking to balance the money out. They put their chips on Seattle and were confident it was the right side. They were correct.

Books gamble all time.

Tonight their gambling on Northeastern covering the 5 points