This is what sent the IND/SAC game to OT

[InTheDrink]

Here's the way I look at halftime bets.

The game line was 10
Indy -10
Sac +10

At halftime sac was up 10.

The 2nd half line was indy -11

Which makes indy -1 for the game
Which makes sac +1 for the game

If you take Sac +11 at -110....they still have to win the game STRAIGHT UP....or push with a 1pt lose.

So my question is....would you have bet sac +1 at -110 Or indy -1 for the game at -110?

Prior to tip would you bet sac +1 for the game?
If the answer is no. Which it should be. Why would you do it at half just because of a small lead.

Am I wrong? Maybe. But if you can honestly tell me what all I said does not make any sense...then I'm sorry for ya

holy shit

[The Kraken]

Unless I'm dumber then I thought. Mike broke it down
100 on +201
100 on +298

Denver by odd number is a payout of 301$ (minus 200 investment leaves you up 101$)
Denver by a even number pays out 398$ (minus your 200 investment) makes you up 198$)

Payouts include original wager of course. Am I missing something?

[Seto]

Aren't these calls supposed to be reviewed though?

You can't review a foul unfortunately...

[Big Bear]

Throw the red flag and challenge

Review the play

haha that would be funny if they did that in NBA

[LordVodka]

What am I missing? What Iwinyourmoney said makes sense. In fact I know people on other boards who only make halftime bets like that.

[RudyRuetigger]

I hope iwins account got hacked

no way a seasoned pro would be saying this

[The Kraken]

LV, are you telling me that taking Ind -11 2H @-110 is equivalent to taking Ind -1 @-110 before the game?

Because thats what Iwin is saying

[Cuse0323]

this thread hurts my brain

[BigWangDangALang]

It is like taking Sacramento +11 for a half.

[Flagrant1]

That's the 2nd time George has gotten a bs call at the end of a game to force OT. He got 3 fts with the Pacers down 3 in NY against the Knicks earlier this season to send that game in OT after they called a phantom foul on Sumpbert.

[face]

Unless I'm dumber then I thought. Mike broke it down
100 on +201
100 on +298

Denver by odd number is a payout of 301$ (minus 200 investment leaves you up 101$)
Denver by a even number pays out 398$ (minus your 200 investment) makes you up 198$)

Payouts include original wager of course. Am I missing something?




not sure what is funny
makes perfect sense and iwon found a loophole

[manny24]

bottom line don't care who was playing or what the situation in the game was

JV call and i don't even like Nocoin

guy should have been castrated at mid court and asked to leave the building

[No coincidences]

bottom line don't care who was playing or what the situation in the game was

JV call and i don't even like Nocoin

guy should have been castrated at mid court and asked to leave the building

Love you too, manny.

I don't even care personally -- I didn't have a bet on this game. Just saw the play, saw the replay, then saw the gif on-line and posted it. Robbery.

[RudyRuetigger]

Unless I'm dumber then I thought. Mike broke it down
100 on +201
100 on +298

Denver by odd number is a payout of 301$ (minus 200 investment leaves you up 101$)
Denver by a even number pays out 398$ (minus your 200 investment) makes you up 198$)

Payouts include original wager of course. Am I missing something?




not sure what is funny
makes perfect sense and iwon found a loophole

Facepalm.gif

[byronbb]

god you guys are dumb

[face]

bet #1 $100.00 @ +201 - loser -$100
bet #2 $100.00 @ +298 - loser - $100
bet #3 $200.00 @ +115 - winner +$430

+30.00
bet #1 $100.00 @ +201 - winner +302
bet #2 $100.00 @ +298 - loser -$100
bet #3 $200.oo @ +115 - loser -$-200

+2
bet #1 $100.00 @ +201 - loser -$100
bet #2 $100.00 @ +298 - winner +$398
bet #3 $200.00 @ +115 - loser -$200

+98

[RudyRuetigger]

bet #1 $100.00 @ +201 - loser -$100
bet #2 $100.00 @ +298 - loser - $100
bet #3 $200.00 @ +115 - winner +$430

+30.00
bet #1 $100.00 @ +201 - winner +302
bet #2 $100.00 @ +298 - loser -$100
bet #3 $200.oo @ +115 - loser -$-200

+2
bet #1 $100.00 @ +201 - loser -$100
bet #2 $100.00 @ +298 - winner +$398
bet #3 $200.00 @ +115 - loser -$200

+98

I hope you don't actually bet

[face]

I hope you don't actually bet

what's your problem

[RudyRuetigger]

what's your problem

Re check your equations

specifically 2 and 3

[keitht]

greatttttttttttttttttt callllllllllllllllllll

[Kaabee]

Re check your equations

specifically 2 and 3

classic shit.

[SportsMushroom]

ref blew the whistle before guy took the shot, he had the presence of mind to release and to score

i agree with iwinyourmoney

you essentially bet the kings to win straight up without their best players and playing arguably the best team in the league

just learn how to take your losses like a man and stop blaming the fix


considering that most money at halftime would be on pacers to make a comeback, not to mention that vegas makes a killing when -900 favs lose straight up, the logical fix would be for sacrament to win, when people cry fix they are retarded


oh and dont get me started on the refs, if they would try to bet the game, they would bet sacramento ml and make a killing, not indiana. game was already gone over so no reason push for more points. and if anything, they wouldnt leave a game they have money on until the last second and hope for a 4 point play

sometimes i feel alone in this world

[billysink]

jayzeuss christos I cannot believe what I just read here.

Hooolleee flying fukk frank.

some fukkers got this all figured out.

[InTheDrink]

Facepalm.gif

[Chi_archie]

where is that Iwin denver game quote from?

[jizay]

where is that Iwin denver game quote from?

Ease up, he was posting from the gym.

[thetrinity]

wtf

[greenhippo]

That's a hell of a pic you got there flagrant.

[YouHave2outs]

[YouHave2outs]

Do you have a play in the NBA tonight, No Coincidences. I think it's a solid board, ripe with value.