I would like to know as well
-
Comment -
guys just google 'moneymepicks'Comment -
ThanksComment -
I see it, try signing out of google, youre getting catered results....Comment -
Moneymepicks.blogspot.ca
Quit being lazy and go back a couple of pagesComment -
It's funny how people say that they have been following or lurking around this thread for a while and still asking for his blog. proves one thing, lies.Comment -
It's there I found itComment -
Moneys got one blog rule no jerkoffs like boeingComment -
lets do this, 4-0 hopefully tonite
Comment -
Checked out his blog...
Here are his picks tonight: Philadelphia +4 ...LA Clippers -10... Denver +6.5...Atlanta +8.5
Hes 0-3 so far..Comment -
Denver was right waiting for clippers
1-2Comment -
At best .500
DamitComment -
MoneyMe NFL PICKS:
Green Bay +7 (5)
GB/DET Over 49 (5)
OAK/DAL Over 48 (4)
Baltimore -2.5 (4)Comment -
Let this thread die. The haters who took moneyme down don't deserve his picks.Comment -
1-1 so far. TD just cashed the over. On to the next one.Comment -
Hello?Comment -
Go home James, you're dead.Comment -
Only flaw with his "system" is that he will absolutely jump all over the square picks. For example, if Miami was playing at Utah and only -3 it would be all over the Heat while the rest of us would be like wtf? Why only -3?
Comment -
Dam homie!!!Comment -
Washington +10 (5)
LA Lakers +5.5 (5)
Milwaukee +5 (4)
Orlando +8.5 (4)
MIA/TOR Over 196.5 (4)Comment -
guaranteed picks? no money back guarantee? hmmmmComment -
Not looking too good now lol.
for following.
Comment -
MoneyMe:"2-4 for the night. 15-13 for the week. I took a good hard look at the system and I replaced some of the variables that had outlying data. So basically, I removed some of the variables that pushed the rating one way or another, but they didn't truly represent the reality of the teams' performance. This has been the first night in a week that I have been able to dedicate that much time to the system. I also added some new variables to the equation. These variables really focus on the history between the teams. For example, instead of looking at a bunch of numbers based on what one team did versus all the teams that they played, the variables now focus those numbers on how that team did when they played that specific team. I'm excited about the results I got so far. Like anything, it's all about maintenance. I'm sure that some doubt has crept into your minds within the last few days, that's normal. If you are not sold on following the plays for the next few days, I understand. Keep an eye on the results of the picks though. As always, BOL."
Still believe in you MoneyComment -
Historical data between teams beyond 1 year will probably do more harm than good... See GB being 9-0 last 9 thanksgivings against DET, GB was the sexy pick but DET killed em. Reason being, GB was the better team 9 out of those 9 years, but not so this year (w/ Rodgers injured).Comment -
NCAA Football:
Missouri (-4) vs. Texas A & M
Georgia (-3) at Georgia Tech
Duke +6.5 at North CarolinaComment -
NBA:
Mavericks +2Comment
