If best College football team played against the worst NFL team,what would be spread?

[dmtrader]

It would be a blowout and many of the college players would get hurt
3rd string NFL players could still beat Bama by 6 TDs

[thebestthereis]

Denard RObinson will have 25 carries for 45 yards against the worst defense in the nfl.

Bama qb will be lit up in the first second against a line. Name a rookie that came from Bama last year that's even a top 3 player on the team. There's not even 1.

Robinson would have 10 turnovers before he gained a yard, vs the worst NFL teams backups

[groovybrandone]

even if the worst nfl rushing team rushed in the gut all day long, size alone will give you most of your yards

[mynameismud]

worst NFL team would beat bama or oregon 10 out of 10 times by at least 3 touchdowns. just like when everyone was wondering how kentucky would do against the bobcats...bobcats would blow them out every time.

[lyon804]

Some scary responses in this thread. About as dumb as those last year that thought the Baylor Woman's BB team could beat one of the worst college men's team.


The NFl vs College is about the same debate as woman vs men in sports. It's not close.


Love telling the story about when I was in HS I played on a very average basketball team which is to say most season's we won about half our games. But it was a large HS playing at the highest level of classification. Our girls basketball team was dominant, undefeated and would up in final 4 state championship. Those little bitches use to rag us all the time how they would beat us. Stupid dyke coach of theirs even believed it and got together with our coach for a "little scrimmage" It was supposed to be a full game, but when it was 43-7 at half time there coach said they needed to go practice now.. College vs NFl. I'd expect something similar. The speed and power of the game is just so much more than Alabama. And trust me I am a fan of the tide, but they wouldn't hang with any nfl team.

[Ernie Mccracken]

The NFl vs College is about the same debate as woman vs men in sports. It's not close.

No, its not. That's a terrible analogy. Physically, the best female athletes in the world are competitive with 14-15 year old boys. There are genetic limitations. Meanwhile, some of the best male athletes in the world are 19-21 years old. This is not a gender issue.

You guys think you're so sharp by parroting the same old rhetoric that was valid when kids didn't have access to top notch facilities and coaching, but times have changed and the best amateur athletes have been improving at a significantly faster rate than the worst pros. There will always be a gap between the two, but it has never been closer than it is now and I would be surprised if the trend didn't continue.

[The Seer]

20 hours a week practice limit for college athletes is a factor.

[BigBusiness]

nice responses

[BigBusiness]

bump

[wildcorndog]

only 7% of college players get drafted so the worst player in the NFL is better than 93% of college players. The score would be whatever the nfl coach wanted it to be.

[wildcorndog]

It could be -50

[BigBusiness]

I don't know guys. This Oregon team is something special!

[Vinnie Paz]

Umm no

Bucs would be like -49 vs Oregon

[Powderguy]

Oregon shit wouldn't work in NFL please

[Doughboy22]

The NFL team is just that. A team full of NFL players. The college team has max 10 guys going to the league. The line if they played with ought letting up would be -42. Final 56-14. NFL team 2 scores a quarter.

[V4Value]

Jags -31.5 v Bama.

[V4Value]

Don't know but that's a shit load of $$$$$$