ACC was not a strong conference this year...UVA lost to Duke twice and didn't win their conference tourney....UNC beat Duke twice (best conference wins), but both games were without Zion and they didn't win their conference tourney...
-
-
Agreed
A lot of the seeds are phucked.Comment -
Virginia has the easiest road of them all.
That said, wouldnt surprise me if none cut the nets down.
The SEC could show up big this year with a chip on their shoulders.Comment -
Gardner Webb will upset UVA....they beat Georgia Tech and Wake Forest on the road..and they almost beat Furman (Very good mid major team) on the road before losing in OT..Comment -
They will have a shot.Originally posted by NardVa
Since Virginia shit the bed last year in this spotComment -
Gardner Webb has a 0% chance of beating UVA. Lightning struck last year...it won't strike twice. UVA has something to prove.
The ACC is legit.
Who should have been a #1 seed over Duke, UNC, and UVA?Comment -
Zion who? UNC lost to em with Zion by 1 whole point and had the final shots to try and win the game but Roy didn't call timeout yet again and his freshman PG messed up with a off balance 3 while trailing by ONE when he should have driven hard... then had a last second tip in attempt that missed because Duke fouled but the refs ignored it bec ESPN wanted 1 more Duke game on TV with Zion...Originally posted by NardVa
Duke is a 3 man teamComment -
The #1 seeds should have been Duke, Michigan State, Gonzaga, and Tennessee (or Kentucky).Originally posted by BigDofBAComment -
I could see MSU but not Tennessee after that loss you Auburn.Originally posted by NardVa
I have a feeling Kentucky won’t make it that far.Comment -
Virginia and duke 100% deserved 1 seeds...then two out of unc MSU and zags were all worthy. The problem is the team left out, MSU in this case, should’ve been seeded with zags or uncComment -
Finished regular season rankings 1, 2, 3. Yeah, they don't deserve #1 seeds
Comment
