JACKSONVILLE ST / CHAT - UNDER 64.5 1st half

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CappinTerp
    SBR Hall of Famer
    • 11-26-09
    • 9650

    #1
    JACKSONVILLE ST / CHAT - UNDER 64.5 1st half
    While both teams have a good FG%, both teams play at a very slow pace. Each team avg. about 55 possessions per game. Eye-balling this and a possible cold spell for either team, think it's worth a small play........................Jack st / chatt - UNDER 64.5 1st HALF......1.5 UNITS..............................GL
  • TheeArchBishop
    SBR MVP
    • 11-17-11
    • 1328

    #2
    Early degenerate action while I'm at work. You sold me - I'm in.
    Comment
    • HeeluvaGuy
      SBR MVP
      • 02-15-14
      • 3449

      #3
      Terp - Not to peepee in your corn flakes, but your possessions per game numbers are way off. Chattanooga averages 71.7 possessions (#205) and Jax St averages 69.8 (#289). I'm not sure where you got 55, but it looks like you might be confusing FGA with possessions. They're not the same. Possessions include FTs and turnovers, which can often be significant. For example, UT-C scores 23% of its points from the ft line.
      Comment
      • CappinTerp
        SBR Hall of Famer
        • 11-26-09
        • 9650

        #4
        Originally posted by HeeluvaGuy
        Terp - Not to peepee in your corn flakes, but your possessions per game numbers are way off. Chattanooga averages 71.7 possessions (#205) and Jax St averages 69.8 (#289). I'm not sure where you got 55, but it looks like you might be confusing FGA with possessions. They're not the same. Possessions include FTs and turnovers, which can often be significant. For example, UT-C scores 23% of its points from the ft line.
        No way,thank you.....I got to remember were It was , ANY thing I put out there I double check......I takes (me) a long time to write a post....I thank you very much,bud!!! Since this is a small bet will prob. still keep it..................One thing about sports betting: One may place a bet,because of angle A,B and C....they all happen..but you loose your bet. On the other hand One may place a bet because of angle A,B and C....NONE of these angles come in......but you win the game!!.................Makes me go nuts.............................Best of luck bud!!!!
        Comment
        • HeeluvaGuy
          SBR MVP
          • 02-15-14
          • 3449

          #5
          And I should have been clearer in my post ... I'm not suggesting this is or isn't the right side. I don't handicap halftime totals at all.

          I hoe it hits! BOL!
          Comment
          • CappinTerp
            SBR Hall of Famer
            • 11-26-09
            • 9650

            #6
            Found my mistake,my bad...but it does happen! Yahoo sports has:CHATT @ 71.7 and Jacksonville st. @ 66.9possessions per game ! My bonehead mistake.....Covers has CHATT @ 54.8 attempts per and Jack ST @55.4 Attempts per game!!........thanks again bud......................I guess I took too much pain meds. this A.M.....
            Comment
            • TheeArchBishop
              SBR MVP
              • 11-17-11
              • 1328

              #7
              Damn lost money on this one.
              Comment
              • GHSCREW
                SBR MVP
                • 10-25-13
                • 1644

                #8
                Little scoring in the end paid off. Nice pick man
                Comment
                • TheeArchBishop
                  SBR MVP
                  • 11-17-11
                  • 1328

                  #9
                  I mean yes, good pick lol. Lucky and happy that it worked out.
                  Comment
                  • HeeluvaGuy
                    SBR MVP
                    • 02-15-14
                    • 3449

                    #10
                    Nicely done! And perfectly executed reverse jinx by Bishop!
                    Comment
                    • freeVICK
                      SBR Hall of Famer
                      • 01-21-08
                      • 7114

                      #11
                      Why is the 2h total at 75?
                      Comment
                      • TheeArchBishop
                        SBR MVP
                        • 11-17-11
                        • 1328

                        #12
                        Over 75?? I think so!
                        Comment
                        • Pikappee251
                          SBR High Roller
                          • 05-24-15
                          • 153

                          #13
                          I hope because they know I need 75 more to hit over!! (I bought it down)
                          Comment
                          • Bbfromgpt
                            SBR Hall of Famer
                            • 09-24-12
                            • 6115

                            #14
                            Anyone have a link
                            Comment
                            • CappinTerp
                              SBR Hall of Famer
                              • 11-26-09
                              • 9650

                              #15
                              Originally posted by freeVICK
                              Why is the 2h total at 75?
                              That is were it should be....for the most part the 2nd half is about 10 points higher than 1st half !! Where it gets hairy is when the 1st half is off by +10 / -10 points...it's then were one can make a good bet!!! It depends on many things,but once you fully understand the fundamentals....one can make a lot of money on the technical part of speculation! ....just watching price action. And ​I am not saying I know it all.!!
                              Comment
                              Search
                              Collapse
                              SBR Contests
                              Collapse
                              Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                              Collapse
                              Working...