IF you had Ville, you are one lucky SOB

[unde0087]

they go from absolute no change in hell to cover, to the luckiest cover in the history of college basketball!

[unde0087]

that is my luck in a nutshell in the past 4 days

[awhitejackson]

omfg biggest OT disaster ever.... 14pts to 0 in the extra 5........f*ck me!!! I'm really about to quit Bball for good now.......BS

[diogee]

Another under goes up in flames due to OT.

[krk1030]

Such a retarded way to lose. Lousville never led by more than like 2 in the entire second half, and then out of nowhere they win OT 16-2.

[frostno98]

I'm fvcking staying from games with too many SBR folks on it for now on! Bad Karma, I think. I should of went with Davidson -12 instead, who's beating the crap out of NC Greensboro.

Weird sh!t always happens in these high profile games with a national audiences, like that UNC vs Wake yesterday. That will why I try to avoid these ESPN games, until once the conference tourneys starts.

[unde0087]

the worst was with 2 minutes to go, I told myself if it goes to overtime I would get ****ed sure enough. Saturday I had to 2nd half unders that were way short and got overtimes in both those games to **** me out of a huge day. Unbelievable, sometimes you can be on the right side and still not win!

[yisman]

totals and spreads should be scored based on regulation. Moneylines should include OT.

It's ridiculous that if two teams tie that you still can lose getting 6.5 points.

[B1GER1C828]

better lucky than good ye ye

[TPowell]

I agree but it was a matter of time until ND wore down

[B1GER1C828]

totals and spreads should be scored based on regulation. Moneylines should include OT.

It's ridiculous that if two teams tie that you still can lose getting 6.5 points.

its how its been for wat, 4ever??

im sure its benefited you at one point, and it hasnt then u havent bet enough because it goes both ways.

[losturmarbles]

Such a retarded way to lose. Lousville never led by more than like 2 in the entire second half, and then out of nowhere they win OT 16-2.

nah they built a lead ~7 midway through the 2nd, then let nd come back and take the lead. they did that i believe 3 times total in the game.

saturday i had 2 games fail to cover after going into ot, spread on one was 8 i believe, so i'll take my lucky win tonight.

[yisman]

its how its been for wat, 4ever??

im sure its benefited you at one point, and it hasnt then u havent bet enough because it goes both ways.

of course it goes both ways. I'm just saying that in general it isn't fair. I've always felt this way.
I didn't care that much whether ND or Louisville covered.

I'm just saying that a 6.5 dog played the favorite to a tie at the end of regulation and somehow doesn't get the cover.

[unit1884]

Thats why you NEVER take full game OVERS and NEVER take +points full game, just take 1st Half lines...

[yisman]

Thats why you NEVER take full game OVERS and NEVER take +points full game, just take 1st Half lines...

I assume you mean full game unders?

[diogee]

Thats why you NEVER take full game OVERS and NEVER take +points full game, just take 1st Half lines...

Risked: 296.59u Won: 157.73u Lost: -120.48u Net: 37.25u Win Percentage 58.56% | 130-92-4

Probably 90% of those are unders.

[diogee]

You take a lot more bad beats on ncaa unders but I still feel there is a lot of value in some of these games which has so far proven to be the case.

[unit1884]

Ya I mean unders, but im saying you can get exactly half the full game total for a 1st half line with no OT screwjobs...

I wonder if you bet every game like this...

1H Under and the Underdog
Full game Over and Favorite

At reduced juice this could profit

[diogee]

Ya I mean unders, but im saying you can get exactly half the full game total for a 1st half line with no OT screwjobs...

The thing with ncaa 1h totals is that you don't get exactly half the full game total...it is usually half the total minus between 8&10.