UAB +6 -107 (5 Dimes)
YTD: 37-45-2, -9.01
YTD: 37-45-2, -9.01
-
-
LT you do know that UAB has lost 4 players in the past week or so, 2 left the team for unspecified reasons, and 2 are out because of grades. they are down to like 6 scholarship players.
IMO that's why UofL had such an easy time with them. I think they only had 8 maybe 9 players against UofL. Their whole team revolves around Vaden, if teams run a lot of traps on him and keep pressure on him and push the tempo of the game it will wear on UAB's lack of depth off the bench.Comment -
LKid, Vaden is far from the only stud UAB has. Paul Delaney, Lawrence Kinnard, and Channing Toney are all solid guards.Comment -
is there a web site i can go to and watch some games?Comment -
-
The butler did it againComment -
i wasn't trying to insinuate that Vaden is the only good player and I wasn't trying to say it was a bad play for LT. I should of been more clear about what i was trying to say. I didn't have money on that game so i had no opinion. I was just pointing out for whoever that UAB's bench is short now. I know Butler isn't known as a pressing and up-tempo team, but i was just trying to point out something that some people might not of read, cause the players weren't starters and only one was giving significant minutes. I know UAB's starting five can hang with just about anyone, but when they come across certain teams as mentioned, that bench could be a problem.
Like against UofL, I wanted to play my Cards after reading about UAB, but i was still worried about how the new line-up change was going to work, but alot of friends who were taking UAB, i was pointing out that info to them and they were still saying UAB would hang and/or beat UofL, and look what happened , Vaden got harassed and pressured and the rest of the starting 5 just wore down with having that short bench.
but i won't point out anything anymore, since everyone is an expert and are all knowing.Comment
