Tampa -1.5 +230.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • shantystar
    SBR Hall of Famer
    • 11-13-05
    • 7299

    #1
    Tampa -1.5 +230.
    Tampa -1.5 +230.
  • MikeFamous1
    SBR Rookie
    • 12-08-11
    • 25

    #2
    no maybe tampa wins but 1.5 no way sorry to disappoint you if you already have the bet in save yourself the money and opt out a struggling tampa team against a hot devils team no chance sorry
    Comment
    • WVUsuperfan
      SBR Wise Guy
      • 08-06-08
      • 769

      #3
      not sure how you would say the devils are hot? I'm a Devils fan and they are far from being hot.. with only 2 wins in their last 7 games
      Comment
      • Titan_12
        SBR MVP
        • 02-19-11
        • 1186

        #4
        Both teams struggling offensively lately.....Tampa struggling a little more on the defensive side of things lately.....Maybe the UNDER would be a better play
        Comment
        • gba
          SBR Sharp
          • 06-06-10
          • 417

          #5
          Undaaaaa!!!!!
          Comment
          • gohabsgo
            SBR MVP
            • 03-19-10
            • 1903

            #6
            Originally posted by Titan_12
            Both teams struggling offensively lately.....Tampa struggling a little more on the defensive side of things lately.....Maybe the UNDER would be a better play
            They've been struggling defensively too.
            Lots of overs for both team lately, pass.

            I'll prolly bet NJ ML, i feel confident with hedberg in the net
            Comment
            • jturn49
              SBR High Roller
              • 11-28-11
              • 114

              #7
              yep under
              Comment
              • FindTheLock
                SBR Hall of Famer
                • 02-27-10
                • 7194

                #8
                I initially thought the under was a solid pick, but then I read who was in net for the devils. The main thing is the lightning have a hard time scoring without St Louis. I wouldn't bet on the lightning no matter what in this game.
                Comment
                • spippen
                  SBR MVP
                  • 03-17-09
                  • 3874

                  #9
                  Originally posted by FindTheLock
                  I initially thought the under was a solid pick, but then I read who was in net for the devils. The main thing is the lightning have a hard time scoring without St Louis. I wouldn't bet on the lightning no matter what in this game.
                  Yes, the Lightning sure do stink, and look like it will be quite a while before they are capable of competing in the NHL. 2 words come to mind with this team - Non competitive.
                  Comment
                  • crzbrave
                    SBR Wise Guy
                    • 01-24-09
                    • 755

                    #10
                    Originally posted by FindTheLock
                    I initially thought the under was a solid pick, but then I read who was in net for the devils. The main thing is the lightning have a hard time scoring without St Louis. I wouldn't bet on the lightning no matter what in this game.

                    What you got against Hedberg pal?
                    Comment
                    • FindTheLock
                      SBR Hall of Famer
                      • 02-27-10
                      • 7194

                      #11
                      Originally posted by crzbrave
                      What you got against Hedberg pal?
                      5-4 when both teams can't score against anyone else. That means both goalies sucked tonight.
                      Comment
                      • onlooker
                        BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                        • 08-10-05
                        • 36572

                        #12
                        Originally posted by FindTheLock
                        5-4 when both teams can't score against anyone else. That means both goalies sucked tonight.
                        I had the Devils, and was waiting to see it tied 5-5 at the end of 3.
                        Comment
                        • FindTheLock
                          SBR Hall of Famer
                          • 02-27-10
                          • 7194

                          #13
                          Originally posted by onlooker
                          I had the Devils, and was waiting to see it tied 5-5 at the end of 3.
                          yeah, if the lightning played with that intensity before they were losing by 3 soft goals then they wouldn't lose so many games. Roloson is past it already in my opinion. The guy can't save a beach ball from going into a 2 liter of coke.
                          Comment
                          • MikeFamous1
                            SBR Rookie
                            • 12-08-11
                            • 25

                            #14
                            Sorry I meant to say hot against a slumping tampa team and of course winnr is devils 5-4 shouldhave been 5-3 on that cheap last second shot where the tripped the defender in the net
                            Comment
                            • MikeFamous1
                              SBR Rookie
                              • 12-08-11
                              • 25

                              #15
                              oh and look now the devils are 19-14-1 when they were a slumping team i told you they were going to get hot no one ever wants to believe me i might just not post anymore cause everyones doing so well without me haha but thanks to all the believers and people who actually say relevant things
                              Comment
                              SBR Contests
                              Collapse
                              Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                              Collapse
                              Working...