Tampa -1.5 +230.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • shantystar
    SBR Hall of Famer
    • 11-13-05
    • 7299

    #1
    Tampa -1.5 +230.
    Tampa -1.5 +230.
  • MikeFamous1
    SBR Rookie
    • 12-08-11
    • 25

    #2
    no maybe tampa wins but 1.5 no way sorry to disappoint you if you already have the bet in save yourself the money and opt out a struggling tampa team against a hot devils team no chance sorry
    Comment
    • WVUsuperfan
      SBR Wise Guy
      • 08-06-08
      • 769

      #3
      not sure how you would say the devils are hot? I'm a Devils fan and they are far from being hot.. with only 2 wins in their last 7 games
      Comment
      • Titan_12
        SBR MVP
        • 02-19-11
        • 1186

        #4
        Both teams struggling offensively lately.....Tampa struggling a little more on the defensive side of things lately.....Maybe the UNDER would be a better play
        Comment
        • gba
          SBR Sharp
          • 06-06-10
          • 417

          #5
          Undaaaaa!!!!!
          Comment
          • gohabsgo
            SBR MVP
            • 03-19-10
            • 1903

            #6
            Originally posted by Titan_12
            Both teams struggling offensively lately.....Tampa struggling a little more on the defensive side of things lately.....Maybe the UNDER would be a better play
            They've been struggling defensively too.
            Lots of overs for both team lately, pass.

            I'll prolly bet NJ ML, i feel confident with hedberg in the net
            Comment
            • jturn49
              SBR High Roller
              • 11-28-11
              • 114

              #7
              yep under
              Comment
              • FindTheLock
                SBR Hall of Famer
                • 02-27-10
                • 7194

                #8
                I initially thought the under was a solid pick, but then I read who was in net for the devils. The main thing is the lightning have a hard time scoring without St Louis. I wouldn't bet on the lightning no matter what in this game.
                Comment
                • spippen
                  SBR MVP
                  • 03-17-09
                  • 3874

                  #9
                  Originally posted by FindTheLock
                  I initially thought the under was a solid pick, but then I read who was in net for the devils. The main thing is the lightning have a hard time scoring without St Louis. I wouldn't bet on the lightning no matter what in this game.
                  Yes, the Lightning sure do stink, and look like it will be quite a while before they are capable of competing in the NHL. 2 words come to mind with this team - Non competitive.
                  Comment
                  • crzbrave
                    SBR Wise Guy
                    • 01-24-09
                    • 755

                    #10
                    Originally posted by FindTheLock
                    I initially thought the under was a solid pick, but then I read who was in net for the devils. The main thing is the lightning have a hard time scoring without St Louis. I wouldn't bet on the lightning no matter what in this game.

                    What you got against Hedberg pal?
                    Comment
                    • FindTheLock
                      SBR Hall of Famer
                      • 02-27-10
                      • 7194

                      #11
                      Originally posted by crzbrave
                      What you got against Hedberg pal?
                      5-4 when both teams can't score against anyone else. That means both goalies sucked tonight.
                      Comment
                      • onlooker
                        BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                        • 08-10-05
                        • 36572

                        #12
                        Originally posted by FindTheLock
                        5-4 when both teams can't score against anyone else. That means both goalies sucked tonight.
                        I had the Devils, and was waiting to see it tied 5-5 at the end of 3.
                        Comment
                        • FindTheLock
                          SBR Hall of Famer
                          • 02-27-10
                          • 7194

                          #13
                          Originally posted by onlooker
                          I had the Devils, and was waiting to see it tied 5-5 at the end of 3.
                          yeah, if the lightning played with that intensity before they were losing by 3 soft goals then they wouldn't lose so many games. Roloson is past it already in my opinion. The guy can't save a beach ball from going into a 2 liter of coke.
                          Comment
                          • MikeFamous1
                            SBR Rookie
                            • 12-08-11
                            • 25

                            #14
                            Sorry I meant to say hot against a slumping tampa team and of course winnr is devils 5-4 shouldhave been 5-3 on that cheap last second shot where the tripped the defender in the net
                            Comment
                            • MikeFamous1
                              SBR Rookie
                              • 12-08-11
                              • 25

                              #15
                              oh and look now the devils are 19-14-1 when they were a slumping team i told you they were going to get hot no one ever wants to believe me i might just not post anymore cause everyones doing so well without me haha but thanks to all the believers and people who actually say relevant things
                              Comment
                              Search
                              Collapse
                              Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                              Collapse
                              Working...