Salmon Steak - NHL - 2010/2011

Canukc · 10-26-10, 05:37 PM

Thanks for helping to change my mind PHI-CLB under. Filled out my SS triple for $115.00 Can. Keep chin up

,

Salmon Steak · 10-26-10, 06:03 PM

Originally posted by Canukc

Thanks for helping to change my mind PHI-CLB under. Filled out my SS triple for $115.00 Can. Keep chin up

,

Oh man please don't really use this. I do really well in nhl actually. I do not put real money on this at all yet. I just want to see what it will do.

Salmon Steak · 10-26-10, 06:05 PM

wed 27

washington (2.1.1.3) -.583 (1.2.3.2) .833 v carolina (2.3.2.3) 1.666 (3.1.3.2) .75
=> 2.666 (+1.0) 3.67 (O6 -115) RISKING $4.22
atlanta (1.1.1.2) -1.916 (1.3.3.3) 2.5 v rangers (1.1.2.2) -.833 (2.1.1.1) -2.75
=> -2.999 (+.5) -2.50 (u5.5 EV) RISKING $2.50
islanders (3.1.2.2) -.333 (1.1.1.3) -.833 v montreal (3.1.2.2) -.333 (2.2.1.1) -2.166
=> -3.665 (+.5) -3.17 (U5.5 -135) RISKING $4.28
pittsburgh (3.3.3.1) .833 (2.2.2.1) -1.083 v tampa bay (3.1.3.2) .75 (3.2.1.3) .25
=> .75 (+1.0) 1.75 (O6 -115) RISKING $2.01
los angeles (3.1.3.2) .75 (2.3.3.1) .583 v chicago (2.1.1.1) -2.75 (1.1.3.2) .25
=> -1.167 (+.5) .67 (NO PLAY)
new jersey (1.2.1.1) -2.416 (3.1.3.2) .75 v san jose (1.3.3.1) .333 (3.1.1.3) -.333
=> -1.666 (+.5) -1.17 (U5.5 -135) RISKING $1.58

Salmon Steak · 10-27-10, 06:11 PM

TUE 26

buffalo (2.3.1.3) .583 (3.1.3.1) -.333 v philadelphia (1.1.3.1) -.833 (3.2.1.1) -1.92
=> -2.503 (+.5) -2.00 (U5.5 -120) RISKING $2.40 L
florida (2.3.1.3) .583 (1.1.3.2) .25 v toronto (3.1.1.1) -2.5 (2.1.1.3) -.583
=> -2.25 (+.5) -1.75 (U5.5 -120) RISKING $2.10 W
phoenix (1.3.2.1) -.75 (2.1.3.1) -.583 v ottawa (2.1.3.1) -.583 (3.3.1.2) -.25
=> -2.166 (+.5) -1.67 (U5.5 -130) RISKING $2.17 L
edmonton (1.2.1.1) -2.42 (3.3.3.3) 3 v calgary (1.1.3.3) 1.333 (1.3.1.1) -1.833
=> .08 (+.5) NO PLAY
anaheim (2.1.2.3) .5 (1.2.1.3) -.25 v dallas (2.3.3.1) .583 (1.3.1.1) -1.833
=> -1 (+.5) NO PLAY
colorado (1.2.1.3) -.25 (3.1.3.3) 1.833 v vancouver (3.1.1.3) -.333 (1.3.1.1)-1.833
=> -.583 NO PLAY

RECORD (10-20) 33.33% -$32.23

Salmon Steak · 10-27-10, 07:18 PM

thur 28 - I WILL KEEP IT THE SAME A LITTLE WHILE LONGER FOR ARE CUNUKC FRIEND DOWN THERE. I JUST DONT SEE US TURNING IT AROUND.

toronto (1.1.1.2) -1.916 (1.1.3.1) -.833 v boston (3.2.3.1) .25 (1.1.1.2) -1.916
=> -4.415 (+.5) -3.92 (U5.5 -145) RISKING $5.68
edmonton (2.1.1.3) -.583 (3.3.3.3) 3 v columbus (2.1.2.1) -1.666 (1.3.1.1) -1.833
=> -1.082 (+.5) -.582 (NO PLAY)
phoenix (3.2.1.1) -1.916 (1.3.1.3) .333 v detroit (1.1.3.3) 1.333 (3.1.1.3) -.333
=> -.583 (+.5) -.083 (NO PLAY)
florida (3.1.3.1) -.333 (1.3.2.2) .333 v ottawa (1.3.1.3) .333 (3.1.2.1) -1.416
=> -1.083 (+.5) -.583 (NO PLAY)
st. louis (1.1.3.1) -.833 (2.2.1.1) -2.166 v nashville (1.2.1.3) -.25 (1.3.1.2) -.75
=> -3.999 (+1.0) -3.00 (U5 EV) RISKING $3.00
washington (1.1.3.1) -.833 (2.3.2.1) -.5 v minnesota (3.3.1.1) -1.333 (1.1.3.2) .25
=> -2.416 (+0.0) -2.42 (U6 -130) RISKING $3.15
los angeles (1.3.2.1) -.75 (3.3.1.2) -.25 v dallas (3.3.1.1) -1.333 (3.1.1.3) -.333
=> -2.666 (+.5) -2.17 (U5.5 -120) RISKING $2.60
colorado (2.1.3.2) .5 (1.3.3.3) 2.5 v calgary (1.3.3.3) 2.5 (3.1.1.3) -.333
=> +5.167 (+.5) +5.67 (O5.5 -105) RISKING $5.95

Record
(10-24) 29.41% -$43.81

Salmon Steak · 10-27-10, 10:02 PM

wed 27 -

washington (2.1.1.3) -.583 (1.2.3.2) .833 v carolina (2.3.2.3) 1.666 (3.1.3.2) .75
=> 2.666 (+0.0) 2.67 (O6 -115) RISKING $3.22 L
atlanta (1.1.1.2) -1.916 (1.3.3.3) 2.5 v rangers (1.1.2.2) -.833 (2.1.1.1) -2.75
=> -2.999 (+.5) -2.50 (u5.5 EV) RISKING $2.50 L
islanders (3.1.2.2) -.333 (1.1.1.3) -.833 v montreal (3.1.2.2) -.333 (2.2.1.1) -2.166
=> -3.665 (+.5) -3.17 (U5.5 -135) RISKING $4.28 L
pittsburgh (3.3.3.1) .833 (2.2.2.1) -1.083 v tampa bay (3.1.3.2) .75 (3.2.1.3) .25
=> .75 (+0.0) (NO PLAY AT 6)
los angeles (3.1.3.2) .75 (2.3.3.1) .583 v chicago (2.1.1.1) -2.75 (1.1.3.2) .25
=> -1.167 (+.5) .67 (NO PLAY)
new jersey (1.2.1.1) -2.416 (3.1.3.2) .75 v san jose (1.3.3.1) .333 (3.1.1.3) -.333
=> -1.666 (+.5) -1.17 (U5.5 -135) RISKING $1.58 L

- I really think this is a backwards value. I messed up making the equations I think somewhere. I will likely switch the final sign soon. If I switch it around I will let you know and will include both records.

Record final for WED 27th

Record (10-24) 29.41% -$43.81

Canukc · 10-28-10, 03:54 PM

IMHOpinion, your picks from Sat-Wed were all logical except for ATL-NYR yesterday. My bets

never were opposite to any of your picks.

Salmon Steak · 10-28-10, 05:26 PM

okay canukc since you would like to keep it this way for a bit longer and seem to be interested I will keep it the same. We just seem to be on the wrong side since day one. 29% on 34 plays so far. I guess tomorrow is a new day.

Salmon Steak · 10-28-10, 06:39 PM

FRI 29

montreal (1.2.2.3) .833 (2.1.1.2) -1.666 v islanders (1.2.2.2) -.25 (1.1.3.3) 1.333
=> .25 (+.5) .75 (NO PLAY)
carolina (3.2.3.1) .25 (1.3.2.1) -.75 v rangers (1.2.2.3) .833 (1.1.1.3)-.833
=> -.5 (+.5) 0 (NO PLAY)
philadelphia (1.3.1.3) .333 (2.1.1.2) -1.666 v pittsburgh (3.3.1.2) -.25 (2.2.1.3) 0
=> -1.583 (+0.0) 1.58 (u6 -115) RISKING $1.82
buffalo (3.1.3.2) .75 (1.3.1.3) .333 v atlanta (1.1.2.3) .25 (3.3.3.3) 3
=> 4.333 (+.5) 4.83 (O5.5 -110) RISKING $5.31
edmonton (1.1.3.1) -.833 (3.3.3.2) 1.916 v chicago (1.1.1.2) -1.916 (1.3.2.1) -.75
=> -1.583 (+.5) -1.08 (u5.5 +105) RISKING $1.03
new jersey (2.1.1.1) -2.75 (1.3.2.3) 1.416 v anaheim (1.2.3.3) 1.916 (2.1.3.1) -.583
=> -.001 (+.5) (NO PLAY)

Salmon Steak · 10-28-10, 09:48 PM

thur 28 - Results final for Thursday

toronto (1.1.1.2) -1.916 (1.1.3.1) -.833 v boston (3.2.3.1) .25 (1.1.1.2) -1.916
=> -4.415 (+.5) -3.92 (U5.5 -145) RISKING $5.68 W
edmonton (2.1.1.3) -.583 (3.3.3.3) 3 v columbus (2.1.2.1) -1.666 (1.3.1.1) -1.833
=> -1.082 (+.5) -.582 (NO PLAY)
phoenix (3.2.1.1) -1.916 (1.3.1.3) .333 v detroit (1.1.3.3) 1.333 (3.1.1.3) -.333
=> -.583 (+.5) -.083 (NO PLAY)
florida (3.1.3.1) -.333 (1.3.2.2) .333 v ottawa (1.3.1.3) .333 (3.1.2.1) -1.416
=> -1.083 (+.5) -.583 (NO PLAY)
st. louis (1.1.3.1) -.833 (2.2.1.1) -2.166 v nashville (1.2.1.3) -.25 (1.3.1.2) -.75
=> -3.999 (+1.0) -3.00 (U5 EV) RISKING $3.00 W
washington (1.1.3.1) -.833 (2.3.2.1) -.5 v minnesota (3.3.1.1) -1.333 (1.1.3.2) .25
=> -2.416 (+0.0) -2.42 (U6 -130) RISKING $3.15 W
los angeles (1.3.2.1) -.75 (3.3.1.2) -.25 v dallas (3.3.1.1) -1.333 (3.1.1.3) -.333
=> -2.666 (+.5) -2.17 (U5.5 -120) RISKING $2.60 L
colorado (2.1.3.2) .5 (1.3.3.3) 2.5 v calgary (1.3.3.3) 2.5 (3.1.1.3) -.333
=> +5.167 (+.5) +5.67 (O5.5 -105) RISKING $5.95 W

Record
(14-25) 35.89% -$31.40

Salmon Steak · 10-28-10, 10:30 PM

Canukc was right everybody

. let's see how we do through the weekend. Lot's of games. Also going to start posting sides formula stuff I was doing for fun but not sure if I should put it in here or make a new thread. This thread is already a nightmare to follow. I have never used it for my normal betting so we can see how that would go too. back tomorrow...

Salmon Steak · 10-29-10, 09:44 PM

FRI 29

montreal (1.2.2.3) .833 (2.1.1.2) -1.666 v islanders (1.2.2.2) -.25 (1.1.3.3) 1.333
=> .25 (+.5) .75 (NO PLAY)
carolina (3.2.3.1) .25 (1.3.2.1) -.75 v rangers (1.2.2.3) .833 (1.1.1.3) -.833
=> -.5 (+.5) 0 (NO PLAY)
philadelphia (1.3.1.3) .333 (2.1.1.2) -1.666 v pittsburgh (3.3.1.2) -.25 (2.2.1.3) 0
=> -1.583 (+0.0) 1.58 (u6 -115) RISKING $1.82 W
buffalo (3.1.3.2) .75 (1.3.1.3) .333 v atlanta (1.1.2.3) .25 (3.3.3.3) 3
=> 4.333 (+.5) 4.83 (O5.5 -110) RISKING $5.31 W
edmonton (1.1.3.1) -.833 (3.3.3.2) 1.916 v chicago (1.1.1.2) -1.916 (1.3.2.1) -.75
=> -1.583 (+.5) -1.08 (u5.5 +105) RISKING $1.03 L
new jersey (2.1.1.1) -2.75 (1.3.2.3) 1.416 v anaheim (1.2.3.3) 1.916 (2.1.3.1) -.583
=> -.001 (+.5) (NO PLAY)

Record
16-26 38% -$26.02

Salmon Steak · 10-30-10, 07:37 AM

sat 30 - That sucked...

nashville (2.1.3.1) -.583 (3.1.2.2) -.333 v detroit (1.3.3.1) .333 (1.1.3.3) 1.333
=> .75 (+.5) 1.25 (O5.5 EV) RISKING $1.25
pittsburgh (3.1.2.1) -1.416 (2.1.3.2) .5 v carolina (2.3.1.3) .583 (3.2.1.2) -.833
=> -1.166 (+.5) .66 (NO PLAY)
florida (1.3.1.2) -.75 (3.2.2.3) 1.333 v montreal (2.2.3.2) 1.083 (1.1.2.1) -1.916
=> -.25 (+.5) .25 (NO PLAY)
boston (2.3.1.1) -1.583 (1.1.2.1) -1.916 v ottawa (3.1.3.3) 1.833 (1.2.1.2) -1.333
=> -2.999 (+1.0) -2.00 (U5 +105) RISKING $1.90
islanders (2.2.2.1) -1.083 (1.3.3.2) 1.416 v philadelphia (3.1.3.2) .75 (1.1.2.1) -1.916
=> -.833 (+.5) -.33 (NO PLAY)
rangers (2.2.3.2) 1.083 (1.1.3.3) 1.333 v toronto (1.1.2.1) -1.916 (1.3.1.1) -1.833
=> -1.333 (+.5) -.83 (NO PLAY)
buffalo (1.3.2.2) .333 (3.1.3.3) 1.833 v dallas (3.1.1.1) -2.5 (1.1.3.3) 1.333
=> .999 (+.5) 1.50 (O5.5 -115) RISKING $1.73
atlanta (1.2.3.3) 1.916 (3.3.3.2) 1.916 v saint louis (1.3.1.2) -.75 (2.1.1.1) -2.75
.332 (+.5) .83 (NO PLAY)
chicago (1.1.2.3) .25 (3.2.1.3) .25 v minnesota (3.1.1.1) -2.5 (1.3.2.1) -.75
=> -2.75 (+.5) -2.25 (U5.5 -120) RISKING $2.70
columbus (1.2.1.2) -1.333 (3.1.1.1) -2.5 v colorado (1.3.2.3) 1.416 (3.3.3.3) 3
=> .583 (+.5) 1.08 (O5.5 -140) RISKING $1.51
tampa bay (1.3.2.3) 1.416 (2.1.3.2) .5 v phoenix (2.1.1.3) -.583 (3.1.3.1) -.333
=> 1 (+.5) 1.50 (O5.5 -105) RISKING $1.58
washington (1.3.1.1) -1.833 (3.2.1.1) -1.916 v calgary (3.3.3.3) 3 (1.1.3.3) 1.333
=> .584 (+.5) 1.08 (O5.5 -105) RISKING $1.13
new jersey (1.1.1.1) -3 (3.2.3.1) .25 v los angeles (3.2.1.3) .25 (3.1.2.1) -1.416
=> -3.916 (+.5) -3.42 (U5.5 -140) RISKING $4.79
anaheim (2.3.3.1) .583 (1.3.1.1) .333 v san jose (3.3.1.3) .833 (1.1.3.1) -.833
=> .916 (+.5) 1.42 (O5.5 -130) RISKING $1.85

Canukc · 10-30-10, 12:01 PM

Looking good. You picked PITT-PHI under

! Only bad was LA-DAL u on Wed? Last week LA scored 11 goals in 4 days and allowed 12 G/A

.

Salmon Steak · 10-31-10, 08:48 PM

sat 30 - FINAL - RECORD (23-28) 45% -$16.83 - We had a good day going 7-2. Huge turnaround since wed. We are going in the right direction despite that bad start. I have to thank canukc for talking me into sticking with it. Let's hope we get in the black soon.

nashville (2.1.3.1) -.583 (3.1.2.2) -.333 v detroit (1.3.3.1) .333 (1.1.3.3) 1.333
=> .75 (+.5) 1.25 (O5.5 EV) RISKING $1.25 W
pittsburgh (3.1.2.1) -1.416 (2.1.3.2) .5 v carolina (2.3.1.3) .583 (3.2.1.2) -.833
=> -1.166 (+.5) .66 (NO PLAY)
florida (1.3.1.2) -.75 (3.2.2.3) 1.333 v montreal (2.2.3.2) 1.083 (1.1.2.1) -1.916
=> -.25 (+.5) .25 (NO PLAY)
boston (2.3.1.1) -1.583 (1.1.2.1) -1.916 v ottawa (3.1.3.3) 1.833 (1.2.1.2) -1.333
=> -2.999 (+1.0) -2.00 (U5 +105) RISKING $1.90 W
islanders (2.2.2.1) -1.083 (1.3.3.2) 1.416 v philadelphia (3.1.3.2) .75 (1.1.2.1) -1.916
=> -.833 (+.5) -.33 (NO PLAY)
rangers (2.2.3.2) 1.083 (1.1.3.3) 1.333 v toronto (1.1.2.1) -1.916 (1.3.1.1) -1.833
=> -1.333 (+.5) -.83 (NO PLAY)
buffalo (1.3.2.2) .333 (3.1.3.3) 1.833 v dallas (3.1.1.1) -2.5 (1.1.3.3) 1.333
=> .999 (+.5) 1.50 (O5.5 -115) RISKING $1.73 L
atlanta (1.2.3.3) 1.916 (3.3.3.2) 1.916 v saint louis (1.3.1.2) -.75 (2.1.1.1) -2.75
.332 (+.5) .83 (NO PLAY)
chicago (1.1.2.3) .25 (3.2.1.3) .25 v minnesota (3.1.1.1) -2.5 (1.3.2.1) -.75
=> -2.75 (+.5) -2.25 (U5.5 -120) RISKING $2.70 W
columbus (1.2.1.2) -1.333 (3.1.1.1) -2.5 v colorado (1.3.2.3) 1.416 (3.3.3.3) 3
=> .583 (+.5) 1.08 (O5.5 -140) RISKING $1.51 W
tampa bay (1.3.2.3) 1.416 (2.1.3.2) .5 v phoenix (2.1.1.3) -.583 (3.1.3.1) -.333
=> 1 (+.5) 1.50 (O5.5 -105) RISKING $1.58 L
washington (1.3.1.1) -1.833 (3.2.1.1) -1.916 v calgary (3.3.3.3) 3 (1.1.3.3) 1.333
=> .584 (+.5) 1.08 (O5.5 -105) RISKING $1.13 W
new jersey (1.1.1.1) -3 (3.2.3.1) .25 v los angeles (3.2.1.3) .25 (3.1.2.1) -1.416
=> -3.916 (+.5) -3.42 (U5.5 -140) RISKING $4.79 W
anaheim (2.3.3.1) .583 (1.3.1.1) .333 v san jose (3.3.1.3) .833 (1.1.3.1) -.833
=> .916 (+.5) 1.42 (O5.5 -130) RISKING $1.85 W

Salmon Steak · 10-31-10, 08:55 PM

Monday 1st -

Chicago (1.2.3.2) .833 (2.1.3.1) -.583 v Rangers (2.3.2.1) -.5 (1.3.3.1) .333
=> .083 (+.5) .58 (NO PLAY)
Carolina (3.1.3.1) -.333 (2.1.2.2) -.583 v Philadelphia (1.3.2.1) -.75 (1.2.1.3) -.25
=> -1.916 (+.5) -1.42 (U5.5 -105) RISKING $1.49
New Jersey (1.1.1.1) -3 (2.3.1.2) -.5 v Vancouver (1.1.3.3) 1.333 (3.1.1.2) -1.416
=> -3.583 (+.5) -3.08 (U5.5 -135) RISKING $4.16

Canukc · 11-01-10, 02:11 PM

I should have listened!

Got all the other unders but took NASH-DET under as well (didn't bet DAL-BUF at all). 7 out of 9 is no mean feat!

Canukc · 11-01-10, 02:21 PM

[quote=Salmon Steak;7180345]Monday 1st -

Chicago (1.2.3.2) .833 (2.1.3.1) -.583 v Rangers (2.3.2.1) -.5 (1.3.3.1) .333
=> .083 (+.5) .58 (NO PLAY)
Carolina (3.1.3.1) -.333 (2.1.2.2) -.583 v Philadelphia (1.3.2.1) -.75 (1.2.1.3) -.25
=> -1.916 (+.5) -1.42 (U5.5 -105) RISKING $1.49
New Jersey (1.1.1.1) -3 (2.3.1.2) -.5 v Vancouver (1.1.3.3) 1.333 (3.1.1.2) -1.416
=> -3.583 (+.5) -3.08 (U5.5 -135) RISKING $4.16

CAR is 6-1 0/U on the road this year and 3-1 head to head last year. I'm taking the over tonight.FWIW (for what it's worth)

Salmon Steak · 11-01-10, 05:52 PM

[quote=Canukc;7189655]

Originally posted by Salmon Steak

Monday 1st -

Chicago (1.2.3.2) .833 (2.1.3.1) -.583 v Rangers (2.3.2.1) -.5 (1.3.3.1) .333
=> .083 (+.5) .58 (NO PLAY)
Carolina (3.1.3.1) -.333 (2.1.2.2) -.583 v Philadelphia (1.3.2.1) -.75 (1.2.1.3) -.25
=> -1.916 (+.5) -1.42 (U5.5 -105) RISKING $1.49
New Jersey (1.1.1.1) -3 (2.3.1.2) -.5 v Vancouver (1.1.3.3) 1.333 (3.1.1.2) -1.416
=> -3.583 (+.5) -3.08 (U5.5 -135) RISKING $4.16

CAR is 6-1 0/U on the road this year and 3-1 head to head last year. I'm taking the over tonight.FWIW (for what it's worth)

I am not picking anything just posting the numbers.

Salmon Steak · 11-01-10, 07:55 PM

tue 2nd - please shop for the best lines if you are playing these

ottawa (1.3.3.1) .333 (2.1.2.3) .5 v toronto (1.2.1.1) -2.416 (3.1.1.1) -2.5
=> -4.083 (+.5) -3.58 (U5.5 -140) RISKING $5.01
montreal (2.3.2.1) -.5 (1.2.1.2) -1.333 v columbus (2.1.2.1) -1.666 (1.1.1.3) -.833
=> -4.332 (+1.0) -3.33 (U5 +105) RISKING $3.17
san jose (3.1.3.3) 1.833 (1.3.1.1) -1.833 v minnesota (1.1.1.1) -3 (3.2.1.2) -.833
=> -3.833 (+.5) -3.33 (U5.5 EV) RISKING $3.33
vancouver (1.3.3.2) 1.41 (1.1.2.1) -1.916 v edmonton (1.3.1.3) .333 (3.3.2.3) 1.916
=> 1.743 (+.5) 2.24 (o5.5 -140) RISKING $3.14

Salmon Steak · 11-02-10, 06:40 AM

Monday 1st - 2-0 moving in the right direction now. Big day tue it looks like

Chicago (1.2.3.2) .833 (2.1.3.1) -.583 v Rangers (2.3.2.1) -.5 (1.3.3.1) .333
=> .083 (+.5) .58 (NO PLAY)
Carolina (3.1.3.1) -.333 (2.1.2.2) -.583 v Philadelphia (1.3.2.1) -.75 (1.2.1.3) -.25
=> -1.916 (+.5) -1.42 (U5.5 -105) RISKING $1.49 W
New Jersey (1.1.1.1) -3 (2.3.1.2) -.5 v Vancouver (1.1.3.3) 1.333 (3.1.1.2) -1.416
=> -3.583 (+.5) -3.08 (U5.5 -135) RISKING $4.16 W

RECORD (25-28) 47% -$12.33

Canukc · 11-02-10, 01:03 PM

Ooops

Originally posted by Salmon Steak

Monday 1st - 2-0 moving in the right direction now. Big day tue it looks like

Chicago (1.2.3.2) .833 (2.1.3.1) -.583 v Rangers (2.3.2.1) -.5 (1.3.3.1) .333
=> .083 (+.5) .58 (NO PLAY)
Carolina (3.1.3.1) -.333 (2.1.2.2) -.583 v Philadelphia (1.3.2.1) -.75 (1.2.1.3) -.25
=> -1.916 (+.5) -1.42 (U5.5 -105) RISKING $1.49 W
New Jersey (1.1.1.1) -3 (2.3.1.2) -.5 v Vancouver (1.1.3.3) 1.333 (3.1.1.2) -1.416
=> -3.583 (+.5) -3.08 (U5.5 -135) RISKING $4.16 W

RECORD (25-28) 47% -$12.33

CONGRATS! Seem to be on to something.

I overanalyzed myself right out of a good thing last night! Tonight I'm conflicted on SJS-MINN, BUT I will go with the under or leave it out comepletely. Twice in a row is enough, even for me!! GL Tonight!

Salmon Steak · 11-02-10, 06:30 PM

Long season man. That game was a toss up just got lucky. Let's wait and see what happens the rest of the season.

WED 3RD - maybe the play of the season tomorrow with tor/was ... i'm nervous. I'm going to parlay the big 4 so far. It's 1 to 50. I won't count it in the record though.

boston (3.1.1.3) -.333 (1.2.1.1) -2.416 v buffalo (3.2.2.1) -.833 (1.3.3.3) 2.5
=> -1.082 (+1.0) -.08 (NO PLAY)
islanders (2.2.1.3) 0 (3.3.2.1) -.25 v carolina (1.3.1.1) -1.833 (1.2.2.2) -.25
=> -2.333 (+.5) -1.83 (U5.5 +105) RISKING $1.74
toronto (2.1.1.1) -2.75 (1.1.1.2) -1.916 v washington (3.1.1.3) -.333 (2.1.1.1) -2.75
=> -7.749 (+1.0) -6.75 (U6 -125) RISKING $8.44
atlanta (2.3.3.2) 1.666 (3.3.2.3) 1.916 v florida (3.1.2.2) -.333 (2.2.3.1) 0
=> 3.582 (+.5) 4.08 (O5.5 -125) RISKING $5.10
new jersey (1.1.1.1) -3 (3.1.2.2) -.333 v chicago (2.3.2.1) -.5 (1.3.1.2) -.75
=> -4.583 (+.5) -4.08 (U5.5 -150) RISKING $6.12
pittsburgh (1.2.1.2) -1.333 (1.3.2.1) -.75 v dallas (1.1.1.3) -.833 (1.3.3.1) .333
=> -2.583 (+.5) -2.08 (U5.5 +105) RISKING $1.98
detroit (3.3.1.3) .833 (1.3.3.1) .333 v calgary (3.3.3.1) .833 (1.3.3.3) 2.5
=> 4.499 (+.5) 5.00 (O5.5 +105) RISKING $4.76
nashville (1.3.1.1) -1.833 (1.2.2.3) .833 v phoenix (1.1.3.1) -.833 (1.3.1.2) -.75
=> -2.583 (+1.0) -1.58 (U5 -110) RISKING $1.74
tampa bay (3.2.3.2) 1.333 (1.3.2.1) -.75 v anaheim (3.3.1.1) -1.333 (3.1.1.3) -.333
=> -1.083 (+.5) .58 (NO PLAY)

Salmon Steak · 11-02-10, 10:17 PM

tue 2nd - please shop for the best lines if you are playing these

ottawa (1.3.3.1) .333 (2.1.2.3) .5 v toronto (1.2.1.1) -2.416 (3.1.1.1) -2.5
=> -4.083 (+.5) -3.58 (U5.5 -140) RISKING $5.01 W
montreal (2.3.2.1) -.5 (1.2.1.2) -1.333 v columbus (2.1.2.1) -1.666 (1.1.1.3) -.833
=> -4.332 (+1.0) -3.33 (U5 +105) RISKING $3.17 W
san jose (3.1.3.3) 1.833 (1.3.1.1) -1.833 v minnesota (1.1.1.1) -3 (3.2.1.2) -.833
=> -3.833 (+.5) -3.33 (U5.5 EV) RISKING $3.33 W
vancouver (1.3.3.2) 1.41 (1.1.2.1) -1.916 v edmonton (1.3.1.3) .333 (3.3.2.3) 1.916
=> 1.743 (+.5) 2.24 (o5.5 -140) RISKING $3.14 W

so 4-0 tonight which is good 19-4 since thursday! I am really glad this is starting to do what it was designed for. Let's hope it continues with the big money tomorrow.

RECORD (29-28) 50.87% +$0.15 - HEY WE ARE IN THE BLACK! LET'S KEEP IT ROLLIN...

Canukc · 11-03-10, 12:39 PM

Tor-wash

Originally posted by Salmon Steak

Long season man. That game was a toss up just got lucky. Let's wait and see what happens the rest of the season.

WED 3RD - maybe the play of the season tomorrow with tor/was ... i'm nervous. I'm going to parlay the big 4 so far. It's 1 to 50. I won't count it in the record though.

boston (3.1.1.3) -.333 (1.2.1.1) -2.416 v buffalo (3.2.2.1) -.833 (1.3.3.3) 2.5
=> -1.082 (+1.0) -.08 (NO PLAY)
islanders (2.2.1.3) 0 (3.3.2.1) -.25 v carolina (1.3.1.1) -1.833 (1.2.2.2) -.25
=> -2.333 (+.5) -1.83 (U5.5 +105) RISKING $1.74
toronto (2.1.1.1) -2.75 (1.1.1.2) -1.916 v washington (3.1.1.3) -.333 (2.1.1.1) -2.75
=> -7.749 (+1.0) -6.75 (U6 -125) RISKING $8.44
atlanta (2.3.3.2) 1.666 (3.3.2.3) 1.916 v florida (3.1.2.2) -.333 (2.2.3.1) 0
=> 3.582 (+.5) 4.08 (O5.5 -125) RISKING $5.10
new jersey (1.1.1.1) -3 (3.1.2.2) -.333 v chicago (2.3.2.1) -.5 (1.3.1.2) -.75
=> -4.583 (+.5) -4.08 (U5.5 -150) RISKING $6.12
pittsburgh (1.2.1.2) -1.333 (1.3.2.1) -.75 v dallas (1.1.1.3) -.833 (1.3.3.1) .333
=> -2.583 (+.5) -2.083 (U5.5 +105) RISKING $??
detroit (3.3.1.3) .833 (1.3.3.1) .333 v calgary (3.3.3.1) .833 (1.3.3.3) 2.5
=> 4.499 (+.5) 5.00 (O5.5 +105) RISKING $4.76
nashville (1.3.1.1) -1.833 (1.2.2.3) .833 v phoenix (1.1.3.1) -.833 (1.3.1.2) -.75
=> -2.583 (+1.0) -1.58 (U5 -110) RISKING $1.74
tampa bay (3.2.3.2) 1.333 (1.3.2.1) -.75 v anaheim (3.3.1.1) -1.333 (3.1.1.3) -.333
=> -1.083 (+.5) .58 (NO PLAY)

Yahoo! I also got in the black with Tues plays +13.00. Was over $200.00 in the Red.
What a comeback- 29-28

? Does't happen very often! I would(will) buy you a bottle if you were in Edmonton, Alberta.
Back to biz. I concur on Tor-Wash, but don't share your enthusium? Is it that good? Please reply if you get the time.

Salmon Steak · 11-03-10, 05:57 PM

I would encourage everyone to be cautious with this. Canukc can tell you how bad this thing can lose also. A week ago this thing was bad news. We might lose everything tonight I don't know.

and canukc I really have no personal opinion on any of the games. I am just posting all the numbers, adding them up, and using that for the unit size (people can use all flat units if they want). That particular game was showing very high numbers because both teams have not allowed many goals or scored many goals the past four games. Does that mean this game will be like the past four games??? I don't know... I hope so. It's a long season and it will be interesting to see where we are in a month or two.

This may also be used for individual team goals but I am not posting anything. For example the New Jersey game a few nights ago. NJ was (1.1.1.1) basically doesn't score vs vancouvers defense (3.1.1.2) which doesn't give up many goals especially recently. I took the under 2.5 @-110 for NJ and presto! 0 goals were scored by New Jersey. Like tonight detroit over 2.5 has a good chance b/c they have scored many goals recently (3.3.1.3) and calgary has given up many as well (1.3.3.3).

good luck all.

Salmon Steak · 11-03-10, 06:47 PM

thursday 04

rangers (3.2.1.2) -.833 (3.3.1.1) -1.333 v philidelphia (3.2.1.2) -.833 (2.1.3.1) -.583
=> -3.582 (+.5) -3.08 (U5.5 -135) RISKING $4.16
columbus (1.2.1.2) -1.333 (1.1.3.1) -.833 v atlanta (3.3.2.3) 1.916 (3.2.3.2) 1.333
=> 1.083 (+.5) 1.58 (O5.5 -115) RISKING $1.82
islanders (2.1.3.1) -.583 (3.2.1.3) .25 v ottawa (3.3.1.2) -.25 (1.2.3.1) -.25
=> -.833 (+.5) -.33 (NO PLAY)
san jose (1.3.3.1) .333 (3.1.1.1) -2.5 v saint louis (3.1.2.3) .75 (1.1.1.2) -1.916
=> -3.333 (+.5) -2.83 (u5.5 -130) RISKING $3.68
vancouver (3.3.2.3) 1.916 (1.2.1.2) -1.333 v colorado (3.2.3.3) 2.416 (3.3.3.1) .833
=> 3.832 (+0.0) 3.83 (O6 -105) RISKING $4.02
tampa bay (2.3.2.1) -.5 (3.2.1.2) -.833 v los angeles (2.1.3.2) .5 (1.2.1.1) -2.416
=> -3.249 (+.5) -2.75 (U5.5 -110) RISKING $3.03

Salmon Steak · 11-04-10, 07:06 AM

WED 3RD - bad times for this last night. I am especially pissed about the nj game 2-2 with 4 min left. nj scores... okay its 3-2 not to worry right. they score 3 more goals in the last 30 seconds

unreal. Nothing really happened like the last 4 games for teams and we lost. moving forward...

boston (3.1.1.3) -.333 (1.2.1.1) -2.416 v buffalo (3.2.2.1) -.833 (1.3.3.3) 2.5
=> -1.082 (+1.0) -.08 (NO PLAY)
islanders (2.2.1.3) 0 (3.3.2.1) -.25 v carolina (1.3.1.1) -1.833 (1.2.2.2) -.25
=> -2.333 (+.5) -1.83 (U5.5 +105) RISKING $1.74 L
toronto (2.1.1.1) -2.75 (1.1.1.2) -1.916 v washington (3.1.1.3) -.333 (2.1.1.1) -2.75
=> -7.749 (+1.0) -6.75 (U6 -125) RISKING $8.44 L
atlanta (2.3.3.2) 1.666 (3.3.2.3) 1.916 v florida (3.1.2.2) -.333 (2.2.3.1) 0
=> 3.582 (+.5) 4.08 (O5.5 -125) RISKING $5.10 W
new jersey (1.1.1.1) -3 (3.1.2.2) -.333 v chicago (2.3.2.1) -.5 (1.3.1.2) -.75
=> -4.583 (+.5) -4.08 (U5.5 -150) RISKING $6.12 L
pittsburgh (1.2.1.2) -1.333 (1.3.2.1) -.75 v dallas (1.1.1.3) -.833 (1.3.3.1) .333
=> -2.583 (+.5) -2.08 (U5.5 +105) RISKING $1.98 L
detroit (3.3.1.3) .833 (1.3.3.1) .333 v calgary (3.3.3.1) .833 (1.3.3.3) 2.5
=> 4.499 (+.5) 5.00 (O5.5 +105) RISKING $4.76 L
nashville (1.3.1.1) -1.833 (1.2.2.3) .833 v phoenix (1.1.3.1) -.833 (1.3.1.2) -.75
=> -2.583 (+1.0) -1.58 (U5 -110) RISKING $1.74 L
tampa bay (3.2.3.2) 1.333 (1.3.2.1) -.75 v anaheim (3.3.1.1) -1.333 (3.1.1.3) -.333
=> -1.083 (+.5) .58 (NO PLAY)

RECORD (30-34) 46% -$20.55 at least we were in the black for a little while.

theredd · 11-04-10, 12:49 PM

Originally posted by Salmon Steak

WED 3RD - bad times for this last night. I am especially pissed about the nj game 2-2 with 4 min left. nj scores... okay its 3-2 not to worry right. they score 3 more goals in the last 30 seconds

unreal. Nothing really happened like the last 4 games for teams and we lost. moving forward...

boston (3.1.1.3) -.333 (1.2.1.1) -2.416 v buffalo (3.2.2.1) -.833 (1.3.3.3) 2.5
=> -1.082 (+1.0) -.08 (NO PLAY)
islanders (2.2.1.3) 0 (3.3.2.1) -.25 v carolina (1.3.1.1) -1.833 (1.2.2.2) -.25
=> -2.333 (+.5) -1.83 (U5.5 +105) RISKING $1.74 L
toronto (2.1.1.1) -2.75 (1.1.1.2) -1.916 v washington (3.1.1.3) -.333 (2.1.1.1) -2.75
=> -7.749 (+1.0) -6.75 (U6 -125) RISKING $8.44 L
atlanta (2.3.3.2) 1.666 (3.3.2.3) 1.916 v florida (3.1.2.2) -.333 (2.2.3.1) 0
=> 3.582 (+.5) 4.08 (O5.5 -125) RISKING $5.10 W
new jersey (1.1.1.1) -3 (3.1.2.2) -.333 v chicago (2.3.2.1) -.5 (1.3.1.2) -.75
=> -4.583 (+.5) -4.08 (U5.5 -150) RISKING $6.12 L
pittsburgh (1.2.1.2) -1.333 (1.3.2.1) -.75 v dallas (1.1.1.3) -.833 (1.3.3.1) .333
=> -2.583 (+.5) -2.08 (U5.5 +105) RISKING $1.98 L
detroit (3.3.1.3) .833 (1.3.3.1) .333 v calgary (3.3.3.1) .833 (1.3.3.3) 2.5
=> 4.499 (+.5) 5.00 (O5.5 +105) RISKING $4.76 L
nashville (1.3.1.1) -1.833 (1.2.2.3) .833 v phoenix (1.1.3.1) -.833 (1.3.1.2) -.75
=> -2.583 (+1.0) -1.58 (U5 -110) RISKING $1.74 L
tampa bay (3.2.3.2) 1.333 (1.3.2.1) -.75 v anaheim (3.3.1.1) -1.333 (3.1.1.3) -.333
=> -1.083 (+.5) .58 (NO PLAY)

RECORD (30-34) 46% -$20.55 at least we were in the black for a little while.

Ive been following this thread, and I hate to admit Ive tailed your plays a few times-without understanding your method

Yeah, I may be a noob but I know its a bad idea to make plays you dont understand . . .

Im wondering if you could explain some of these notations, for for example:

detroit (3.3.1.3) .833 (1.3.3.1) .333 v calgary (3.3.3.1) .833 (1.3.3.3) 2.5
=> 4.499 (+.5) 5.00 (O5.5 +105) RISKING $4.76 L

Pretty much Im clueless on everything to the left of O5.5 +105

Perhaps you could have mercy on the thickheaded and explain the notation? Its nice having someone do all the work for me, but Im here to figure out how to do this stuff for myself, so I'll be thankful for whatever you can tell me . . .

Salmon Steak · 11-04-10, 05:27 PM

theredd, i'm not sure you want to tail this as it is not exactly producing a positive result. I am really just doing this to see what it will do. The number sets which get colors added represent goals scored. I use only the three numbers because #1 if a teams scores 8 goals as a fluke one night I don't want it to throw off the numbers and #2 using all the number combinations would produce many results which would suck for me to find. Each number set has a value predetermined by a combination of equations based off the number set. I had excel do it so I don't have to everytime (this takes me enough time). The most importance is place on the most recent games but that may really be hurting us actually. Each set has either a positive or negative value so "0" would be 6 "goals" or whatever. I add them together because teams that score often and gets scored on often go over. That is the first number the 4.499. If a line is set at 5.5 I add +.5 (totally just made up to adjust it, I dont know what the real number should be). If it is a total of 5 I add +1.0. It is always added b/c a negative number (Under 6) should be smaller b/c the line is 5.5. A postive number (Over 6) should get bigger with a 5.5 line. If someone could figure out the exact right value to add I would be very thankful. Then you get the adjusted number the 5.00 (rounded to two decimal places b/c i'm using that as a unit amount. Then I show the line and the amount risked to reach that unit. Hopefully that helped.

Salmon Steak · 11-04-10, 05:59 PM

friday 5th

rangers (2.1.2.1) -1.666 (3.1.1.3) -.333 v new jersey (1.1.1.3) -.833 (1.2.2.2) -.25
=> -3.082 (NO LINE YET)
boston (1.1.3.3) 1.333 (2.1.1.1) -2.75 v washington (1.1.3.3) 1.333 (1.1.1.3) -.833
=> -.917 (+.5) -.42 (NO PLAY)
montreal (3.2.1.1) -1.916 (2.1.2.2) -.583 v buffalo (2.2.1.1) -2.166 (3.3.3.3) 3
=> -1.665 (NO LINE YET)
carolina (3.1.1.3) -.333 (2.2.2.1) -1.083 v florida (1.2.2.2) -.25 (2.3.1.3) .583
=> -1.083 (+.5) -.58 (NO PLAY)
calgary (3.3.1.1) -1.333 (3.3.3.1) .833 v minnesota (1.1.1.1) -3 (2.1.2.1) -1.666
=> -5.166 (+1.0) -4.17 (U5 +110) RISKING $3.79
phoenix (1.3.1.3) .333 (3.1.2.2) -.333 v dallas (1.1.3.3) 1.333 (3.3.1.1) -1.333
=> 0 (+.5) .5 (NO PLAY)
detroit (3.1.3.1) -.333 (3.3.1.1) -1.333 v edmonton (3.1.3.2) .75 (3.2.3.3) 2.416
=> 1.5 (+.5) 2.00 (O5.5 -130) RISKING $2.60
pittsburgh (2.1.2.1) -1.666 (3.2.1.3) .25 v anaheim (3.1.1.2) -1.416 (1.1.3.1) -.833
=> -3.665 (+.5) -3.17 (U5.5 +115) RISKING $2.76

theredd · 11-04-10, 08:31 PM

Thanks for the explanation

Salmon Steak · 11-04-10, 10:31 PM

thursday 04 (FINAL)

rangers (3.2.1.2) -.833 (3.3.1.1) -1.333 v philidelphia (3.2.1.2) -.833 (2.1.3.1) -.583
=> -3.582 (+.5) -3.08 (U5.5 -135) RISKING $4.16 W
columbus (1.2.1.2) -1.333 (1.1.3.1) -.833 v atlanta (3.3.2.3) 1.916 (3.2.3.2) 1.333
=> 1.083 (+.5) 1.58 (O5.5 -115) RISKING $1.82 L
islanders (2.1.3.1) -.583 (3.2.1.3) .25 v ottawa (3.3.1.2) -.25 (1.2.3.1) -.25
=> -.833 (+.5) -.33 (NO PLAY)
san jose (1.3.3.1) .333 (3.1.1.1) -2.5 v saint louis (3.1.2.3) .75 (1.1.1.2) -1.916
=> -3.333 (+.5) -2.83 (u5.5 -130) RISKING $3.68 W
vancouver (3.3.2.3) 1.916 (1.2.1.2) -1.333 v colorado (3.2.3.3) 2.416 (3.3.3.1) .833
=> 3.832 (+0.0) 3.83 (O6 -105) RISKING $4.02 L
tampa bay (2.3.2.1) -.5 (3.2.1.2) -.833 v los angeles (2.1.3.2) .5 (1.2.1.1) -2.416
=> -3.249 (+.5) -2.75 (U5.5 -110) RISKING $3.03 W

RECORD (33-36) 47.82% -$17.73

Canukc · 11-05-10, 02:14 PM

All under last night? In the past I have just played unders unless there were not enough. Super for playoffs! Lately I've strayed into the world of the overs and I got whacked last two nights. Between COL,TB, ATL, NYR (Top four out of five overs) last 2 nights scored 2 goals. Not 2 goals each. Two goals total? I'm going back` to unders. Everyone is going under on NYR/NJ and PIT/ANA??? I can't fathom why but I am following your numbers and taking PITT/ANA under. Back in the RED.

Salmon Steak · 11-05-10, 05:49 PM

friday 5th - (FINAL)

rangers (2.1.2.1) -1.666 (3.1.1.3) -.333 v new jersey (1.1.1.3) -.833 (1.2.2.2) -.25
-3.082 (+1.0) -2.08 (U5 +110) RISKING $1.89 W
boston (1.1.3.3) 1.333 (2.1.1.1) -2.75 v washington (1.1.3.3) 1.333 (1.1.1.3) -.833
=> -.917 (+.5) -.42 (NO PLAY)
montreal (3.2.1.1) -1.916 (2.1.2.2) -.583 v buffalo (2.2.1.1) -2.166 (3.3.3.3) 3
=> -1.665 (+.5) -1.17 (U5.5 -130) RISKING $1.52 W
carolina (3.1.1.3) -.333 (2.2.2.1) -1.083 v florida (1.2.2.2) -.25 (2.3.1.3) .583
=> -1.083 (+.5) -.58 (NO PLAY)
calgary (3.3.1.1) -1.333 (3.3.3.1) .833 v minnesota (1.1.1.1) -3 (2.1.2.1) -1.666
=> -5.166 (+1.0) -4.17 (U5 +110) RISKING $3.79 W
phoenix (1.3.1.3) .333 (3.1.2.2) -.333 v dallas (1.1.3.3) 1.333 (3.3.1.1) -1.333
=> 0 (+.5) .5 (NO PLAY)
detroit (3.1.3.1) -.333 (3.3.1.1) -1.333 v edmonton (3.1.3.2) .75 (3.2.3.3) 2.416
=> 1.5 (+.5) 2.00 (O5.5 -130) RISKING $2.60 L
pittsburgh (2.1.2.1) -1.666 (3.2.1.3) .25 v anaheim (3.1.1.2) -1.416 (1.1.3.1) -.833
=> -3.665 (+.5) -3.17 (U5.5 +115) RISKING $2.76 W

RECORD (37-37) 50% -9.74