Pittsburgh had lost last night. This should be G3 for Pittsburgh
-
Comment -
They won on the PL. You have to take the PL for the dog and ML for the fav.Originally posted by ctrComment -
November 9
Record : 13-1
Units won (lost) : -10.74u (Los Angeles -23.74u)
G1 - (8-6)
G2 - (5-1)
G3 - (0-1)
G1 - EdmontonComment -
November 10
Record : 13-1
Units won (lost) : -10.74u (Los Angeles -23.74u)
G1 - (8-7)
G2 - (5-1)
G3 - (0-1)
G1 - Edmonton
G2 - ColoradoComment -
Isn't Colorado G2? They Lost the last 4 ATS SU
Originally posted by grecycle99Comment -
You're right. Corrected. ThanksOriginally posted by wolfbirdComment -
November 11
Record : 13-1
Units won (lost) : -10.74u (Los Angeles -23.74u)
G1 - (8-7)
G2 - (5-1)
G3 - (0-1)
G1 - Edmonton, Islanders
G2 - ColoradoComment -
November 12
Record : 14-1
Units won (lost) : -9.74u (Los Angeles -23.74u)
G1 - (8-8)
G2 - (6-1)
G3 - (0-1)
G1 - New Jersey, Islanders
G2 - EdmontonComment -
November 14
Record : 17-1
Units won (lost) : -6.74u (Los Angeles -23.74u)
G1 - (10-8)
G2 - (7-1)
G3 - (0-1)
G1 - Los Angeles
Comment -
November 17
Record : 18-1
Units won (lost) : -5.74u (Los Angeles -23.74u)
G1 - (11-8)
G2 - (7-1)
G3 - (0-1)
No PlayComment -
November 18
Record : 18-1
Units won (lost) : -5.74u (Los Angeles -23.74u)
G1 - (11-8)
G2 - (7-1)
G3 - (0-1)
G1 - PittsburghComment -
November 20
Record : 18-1
Units won (lost) : -5.74u (Los Angeles -23.74u)
G1 - (11-9)
G2 - (7-1)
G3 - (0-1)
G2 - PittsburghComment -
November 24
Missed St Louis wich was a G1 winner yesterday
Record : 20-1
Units won (lost) : -3.74u (Los Angeles -23.74u)
G1 - (12-9)
G2 - (8-1)
G3 - (0-1)
G1 - OttawaComment -
November 26
Record : 20-1
Units won (lost) : -3.74u (Los Angeles -23.74u)
G1 - (12-9)
G2 - (8-1)
G3 - (0-1)
G1 - Florida, OttawaComment -
November 27
Record : 21-1
Units won (lost) : -2.74u (Los Angeles -23.74u)
G1 - (13-9)
G2 - (8-2)
G3 - (0-1)
G1 - Detroit
G2 - OttawaComment -
21-1 and down -2 units??Comment -
We lost 23u with LAComment -
is it supposed to be 22-11? im confused...was it some sort of all in bet?Comment -
It's a chaseComment -
November 28
Record : 22-1
Units won (lost) : -1.74u (Los Angeles -23.74u)
G1 - (13-10)
G2 - (9-1)
G3 - (0-1)
G1 - Detroit
Comment -
November 29
Record : 23-1
Units won (lost) : -0.74u (Los Angeles -23.74u)
G1 - (14-10)
G2 - (9-1)
G3 - (0-1)
G1 - San JoseComment -
December 4
Record : 24-1
Units won (lost) : 0.26u (Los Angeles -23.74u)
G1 - (14-11)
G2 - (10-1)
G3 - (0-1)
G1 - MinnesotaComment -
December 5
Record : 25-1
Units won (lost) : 1.26u (Los Angeles -23.74u)
G1 - (15-11)
G2 - (10-1)
G3 - (0-1)
No PlayComment -
December 6
Record : 25-1
Units won (lost) : 1.26u (Los Angeles -23.74u)
G1 - (15-11)
G2 - (10-1)
G3 - (0-1)
G1 - CarolinaComment -
Carolina isn't playing todayOriginally posted by grecycle99Comment -
think hes talkin bout tomorrowComment -
Hey Greg, record of 25-1 is very impressive. Do you know if there is any historical data on NHL chases over the past couple years? It'd be cool if we could look into it and perform a recoup.
Apologies if someone already has and this has been discussed in an earlier thread.
Comment -
I post the plays has they come. Even if they don't play that night. You just have to check the schedule and determine when they play. It's not a big effort to do so.Originally posted by Pickem2winComment -
Hi Mxs1332, Not sure if they are, it's the first year that I post it.Originally posted by Mxs1332Hey Greg, record of 25-1 is very impressive. Do you know if there is any historical data on NHL chases over the past couple years? It'd be cool if we could look into it and perform a recoup.
Apologies if someone already has and this has been discussed in an earlier thread.
Comment -
December 8
Record : 26-1
Units won (lost) : 2.26u (Los Angeles -23.74u)
G1 - (16-11)
G2 - (10-1)
G3 - (0-1)
No Play
Trying this version of the system! Play a team with a record 0.500 and over that lost 2 games ats and ml in a row. This work in baseball but I don't know the records. Play at your own risk.
Record : 0-0
Units won (lost) : 0u
G1 - (0-0)
G2 - (0-0)
G3 - (0-0)
G1 - MinnesotaComment -
December 9
Record : 26-1
Units won (lost) : 2.26u (Los Angeles -23.74u)
G1 - (16-11)
G2 - (10-1)
G3 - (0-1)
No Play
Trying this version of the system! Play a team with a record 0.500 and over that lost 2 games ats and ml in a row. This work in baseball but I don't know the records. Play at your own risk.
Record : 0-0
Units won (lost) : 0u
G1 - (0-0)
G2 - (0-0)
G3 - (0-0)
G1 - Minnesota, Nashville, TorontoComment -
December 12
Record : 26-1
Units won (lost) : 2.26u (Los Angeles -23.74u)
G1 - (16-11)
G2 - (10-1)
G3 - (0-1)
No Play
Trying this version of the system! Play a team with a record 0.500 and over that lost 2 games ats and ml in a row. This work in baseball but I don't know the records. Play at your own risk.
Record : 3-0
Units won (lost) : 3u
G1 - (3-0)
G2 - (0-0)
G3 - (0-0)
G1 - Colorado, ColumbusComment -
December 13
Record : 26-1
Units won (lost) : 2.26u (Los Angeles -23.74u)
G1 - (16-11)
G2 - (10-1)
G3 - (0-1)
No Play
Trying this version of the system! Play a team with a record 0.500 and over that lost 2 games ats and ml in a row. This work in baseball but I don't know the records. Play at your own risk.
Record : 3-0
Units won (lost) : 3u
G1 - (3-0)
G2 - (0-0)
G3 - (0-0)
G1 - Colorado, Columbus, DallasComment -
December 14
Record : 26-1
Units won (lost) : 2.26u (Los Angeles -23.74u)
G1 - (16-11)
G2 - (10-1)
G3 - (0-1)
No Play
Trying this version of the system! Play a team with a record 0.500 and over that lost 2 games ats and ml in a row. This work in baseball but I don't know the records. Play at your own risk.
Record : 5-0
Units won (lost) : 5u
G1 - (5-0)
G2 - (0-0)
G3 - (0-0)
G1 - ColoradoComment -
December 15
Record : 26-1
Units won (lost) : 2.26u (Los Angeles -23.74u)
G1 - (16-11)
G2 - (10-1)
G3 - (0-1)
G1 - Colorado
Trying this version of the system! Play a team with a record 0.500 and over that lost 2 games ats and ml in a row. This work in baseball but I don't know the records. Play at your own risk.
Record : 5-0
Units won (lost) : 5u
G1 - (5-1)
G2 - (0-0)
G3 - (0-0)
G2 - ColoradoComment
