Detroit / Tampa Bay

[PorkChop]

Under 5.5.

Thought I would be getting an even 5.

Love it at 5.5

[NavsPicks]

Bad bet. Bishop is great but 0 playoff experience same goes for mrazek. Wouldn't touch the under with stamkos drouin kucherov Johnson zetterberg datsyuk nyqvist Tatar kronwall on the ice.

[eddycash]

i agree, why is the total moving up when money is already on the under?

[Mike Huntertz]

Tb is top scoring team. ...... 5.5 is right.

[bob6199]

Bishop and Det's goalie both aren't very good and if one of the teams goes off, the under is toast.

[NavsPicks]

Bishop and Det's goalie both aren't very good and if one of the teams goes off, the under is toast.

Are you stupid? Bishop a top 3 goalie this year and mrazek has been great. IN THE reg season

[bob6199]

Are you stupid? Bishop a top 3 goalie this year and mrazek has been great. IN THE reg season

LoL, Bishop blows i can't believe you just stated he was good and Mrazek gave up goals in bunches in some games...

[NavsPicks]

LoL, Bishop blows i can't believe you just stated he was good and Mrazek gave up goals in bunches in some games...

Wow this is why I don't come on sbr forum. Retards think they know what they're talking about.

[bob6199]

Wow this is why I don't come on sbr forum. Retards think they know what they're talking about.

yea because 2 guys who aren't even top 10 in ANY goalie statistic is a top 3 goalie and a great goalie, whatever buddy believe what you want. ONLY on SBR can someone believe that.

Edit: Forgot Bishop is 4 in wins, which is the most useless stat for determining if a goalie is good, sry for forgetting that.

[whareouttogetme]

I wouldn't call Bishop a top 3 goalie tbh

[bob6199]

I wouldn't call Bishop a top 3 goalie tbh

no1 would, i can't even fathom anyone putting him top 5, for god sake. John Gibson who was 19 at the time, passed Bishop on the U.S Depth Chart, dude isn't good. Price, Hank, Quick, Rask, Rinne, Sir Bob, Schneider, Dubynk, Talbot, Luongo. I'll take those 10 easily over Bishop right now.

[NavsPicks]

Last year he was a vezina finalist . hes taken this team this far.. Maybe neither of you watch hockey but last year he got hurt and they got swept by a Montreal team .. That same Montreal team got dominated by tampa + bishop this year. Mrazek is a great young goalie unproven but still a good goalie.

[bob6199]

Last year he was a vezina finalist . hes taken this team this far.. Maybe neither of you watch hockey but last year he got hurt and they got swept by a Montreal team .. That same Montreal team got dominated by tampa + bishop this year. Mrazek is a great young goalie unproven but still a good goalie.

Vezina just means he had a good year, playing for a good team, not impressed, and both of those teams added and lost pieces which makes your argument that Bishop is the only reason invalid, Mrazek has had good and bad games and i stated he could get rocked which he has at times this year.

[NavsPicks]

Vezina just means he had a good year, playing for a good team, not impressed, and both of those teams added and lost pieces which makes your argument that Bishop is the only reason invalid, Mrazek has had good and bad games and i stated he could get rocked which he has at times this year.

You don't know shit about hockey compared to me . If u ever wanna compare our graded wagers hit me up. Peace

[NavsPicks]

44 saves in his debut. BUT since he let in a couple goals in the games you watched he must suck!

[bob6199]

Bishop looked REAL GOOD today LoL, clown. Rookie held his own, still doesn't change the fact he has had games where he gave up a bunch, he is 50/50 on what he will do. Whatever tho, you're an idiot, i have seen multiple post from you in the past that confirm this, so i just going to put you on my ignore list, as you should do to me. Ta Ta now.

[NavsPicks]

Air better that can't show shit. Not a dime to ur name kid

[PorkChop]

Sweated that one.