Anyone like this play at odds 1.90 total goals in the first period OVER 1.5.
-
-
No leans there tbh..
CHI has been very unpredictable as a heavy chalk play.. I've been torched in my limited experience with 1st period totals..
Montoya def good to give up a couple I would think.. but in what period, I have no idea..
GL tonight.Comment -
I think I will try this one.
Hawks a bit stung by dropping one to Flameouts.Comment -
Yea I just took a stab at, nothing big or anything. Just last 4 games had, 2, 3, 4, 4 and I think all with Pavelok in net so with Al in net, Chicago should be able to score atleast 2... Care bet.Comment -
i was going to take hawks -1.5 for the same reason but didn't make it in time
good luck tonightComment -
NEED 1 MORE IN 2 FHKING MINS. FHK YOU!
Comment -
Hahahah, nice one
Comment -
Comment -
hahaha how do you LOVE that!!! was just watching the last 10 seconds tick off the clock, thinking , awww $hit, it didn't hit for the boys'.. and then saw Kane come in and was like.. Ohhhh nooooo he wouldn't would he!! and HE DID!
Didn't tail, but the action, knowing ya'll were on it, was enough for me..
Nice hit! lucky finish boys!Comment -
Same here! Exactly the same thoughtsOriginally posted by rainman416
Comment -
Wait.. just realized.. was this bet on CHI team total for first?!? if so.. that makes this even juicier.. I thought this whole time it was just for Total in general to be OVER1.5..
Either way.. a W. but if just CHI-TT over1.5.. now thats Tits baby!Comment -
No it was 1st period over 1.5.Originally posted by rainman416Comment -
K.. wow. I was gonna say.. CHI TT OVER1.5 in 1st.. if that even exists.. woulda had to pay +200 at least no? ..Originally posted by ZdenoKComment -
Originally posted by rainman416
HAHAHAHA same, got lucky but will take it. It was Total goals over 1.5 for the first period. lolComment -
Originally posted by rainman416
Never seen this kind of bet, though i only play at 2 books so i'm not sure. I would assume it would be a big +Comment -
Yeah, I think it would be at least +300. Chicago -1.5 in 1st P was at +385. I'll tell you a huge blooper of mine yesterday. I was checking the lines with my phone and mobile version of my bookie is very weird. I wanted to bet on Ottawa -1 vs Columbus because the odds were too good to pass. What I did was I accidently played Ottawa -1 in 1st period which explains why the odds looked so good. You can imagine my surprise when I next logged in and saw all the money there. The odds were at +395Originally posted by rainman416
(Ottawa won first period with 2-0)
Comment -
Slam and then toast??????????????????????Originally posted by kevin101NEED 1 MORE IN 2 FHKING MINS. FHK YOU!Comment -
Slam Dunk Sir.Originally posted by Mike Huntertz
Comment -
Slam yourself and then toast yourself??????????????????????
I love it....thanxs!
6 seconds!Comment -
Originally posted by ZdenoKYeah, I think it would be at least +300. Chicago -1.5 in 1st P was at +385. I'll tell you a huge blooper of mine yesterday. I was checking the lines with my phone and mobile version of my bookie is very weird. I wanted to bet on Ottawa -1 vs Columbus because the odds were too good to pass. What I did was I accidently played Ottawa -1 in 1st period which explains why the odds looked so good. You can imagine my surprise when I next logged in and saw all the money there. The odds were at +395(Ottawa won first period with 2-0)
Haha sick.Comment
