LT love the stanford pk. your thoughts on cal. berkeley plus 17.5 vs. ohio st. cal lost at home to nevada-reno wk.1 expect them to be real focused and pissed
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#4
Originally posted by agendaman
LT love the stanford pk. your thoughts on cal. berkeley plus 17.5 vs. ohio st. cal lost at home to nevada-reno wk.1 expect them to be real focused and pissed
Unreal, what do people see in UNLV. I wanted to bet them on the GOY lines @ +17.5. Nevertheless two games into the season, dropping a game to an FCS opponent, and a line currently sitting @ +11.5 I see a garbage team.
Comment
gojetsgomoxies
SBR MVP
09-04-12
4222
#7
Originally posted by HoulihansTX
Unreal, what do people see in UNLV. I wanted to bet them on the GOY lines @ +17.5. Nevertheless two games into the season, dropping a game to an FCS opponent, and a line currently sitting @ +11.5 I see a garbage team.
yup, i think UNLV and Tulane especially are sucker bets every single season but we can't resist.......... i think though UNLV has one of the bigger home field advantages statistically (big differential between home and road performance), some were calling for them to be improved (played minnesota tough) and WSU hasn't been very impressive yet with mike leach.
i like UNLV here. also, thursday and friday espn tilts tend to be competitive and extremely huge home field advantage i think
Love Northern Illinois. Army is an easy fade when they are a home dog.
Comment
M.W.
SBR MVP
09-07-08
1668
#14
Originally posted by HoulihansTX
Unreal, what do people see in UNLV. I wanted to bet them on the GOY lines @ +17.5. Nevertheless two games into the season, dropping a game to an FCS opponent, and a line currently sitting @ +11.5 I see a garbage team.
They covered a smaller number against Minnesota, which is comparable to Wash State. And they were supposed to lose to NAU.
Comment
El Nino
SBR Posting Legend
05-03-12
18426
#15
Originally posted by M.W.
They covered a smaller number against Minnesota, which is comparable to Wash State. And they were supposed to lose to NAU.
UNLV was like -11.5 against NAU. How is that "supposed to lose"?
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#16
Another Saturday Addition
THURSDAY, 9/13
Rutgers +8 -110 (Bookmaker)
FRIDAY, 9/14
UNLV +10.5 -108 (Heritage)
SATURDAY, 9/15
Northern Illinois -3 -109 (Heritage)
Arizona State +6.5 -110 (5 Dimes)
Stanford +9 -108 (Heritage)
New Mexico State +12 -110 (Bookmaker)
Comment
M.W.
SBR MVP
09-07-08
1668
#17
Originally posted by El Nino
UNLV was like -11.5 against NAU. How is that "supposed to lose"?
They were more like -13. It was a bad line. If you actually capped the game, you'd make NAU a small favorite. I won quite a bit on the moneyline in that one.
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#18
2 Saturday Additions
THURSDAY, 9/13
Rutgers +8 -110 (Bookmaker)
FRIDAY, 9/14
UNLV +10.5 -108 (Heritage)
SATURDAY, 9/15
Northern Illinois -3 -109 (Heritage)
Virginia +10 -115 (Rebate Wager)
Arizona State +6.5 -110 (5 Dimes)
Arizona State / Missouri UNDER 63.5 -110 (Bookmaker)
Stanford +9 -108 (Heritage)
New Mexico State +12 -110 (Bookmaker)
Comment
fitguy67
SBR Hall of Famer
03-13-11
5082
#19
cash rutgers +8
Comment
branch0095
SBR High Roller
12-03-09
247
#20
I live in Columbus and am a die hard Buckeye fan, but I usually don't like touching large chalk on the Buckeyes. Could go either way. Im sure they'll win, but cover?
Carlos Hyde, who has started at TB with the injury to Jordan Hall will be out due to an MCL.
Its been said Jordan Hall will play this week, but probably in a limited role. Freshman Brionte Dunn will share time with Hall, and IMO get the bulk of the load. Hes looked good, but untested. Hall is definately the quickest and most elusive back for OSU, and is more of a threat out of the backfield and a better fit to Urban Meyer's offense. Im just not sure how many plays he'll see. Braxton Miller has been the OSU offense so far and looked good. But with roughly 45 carries from the QB spot in the first two games, it scares the hell out of me every time he takes a hit. He did have to leave the game in week one against Miami Ohio but returned.
The biggest concern for me as far as OSU covering big chalk is their secondary. Theyve been torched for big play after big play the first two weeks, and if not for a couple bad drops by Miami recievers, would have been in a quick 17-0 hole in their opener.
Cal obviously isnt very good, and I know little about them, but if they have a decent pass game, this could be alot closer than it should be. This game is a pass for me, but feel confident in using OSU ML to reduce a little juice in some other bets as they will win.
Comment
ctguy
SBR Sharp
09-04-11
376
#21
I don't believe in locks but is northern ill the type of game you can feel confident unloading on?
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#22
Originally posted by ctguy
I don't believe in locks but is northern ill the type of game you can feel confident unloading on?
Not "unload", just a normal play like everything else.
Comment
HoulihansTX
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
02-12-09
30566
#23
Originally posted by M.W.
They covered a smaller number against Minnesota, which is comparable to Wash State. And they were supposed to lose to NAU.
Pure nonesense
Comment
BamaCBass
SBR MVP
10-07-09
1252
#24
Nice call on Rutgers LT. Thanks man.
Comment
fitguy67
SBR Hall of Famer
03-13-11
5082
#25
UNLV hitting with the late cover in CF...(along with the 3-3 split in MLB)...means another up day
Comment
Chavs
SBR High Roller
10-04-07
209
#26
Good start to the weekend LT!!!
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#27
CFB 7-Pack (Added ML Upset)
Northern Illinois -3 -109 (Heritage)
Virginia +10 -115 (Rebate Wager)
Arizona State +6.5 -110 (5 Dimes)
Arizona State / Missouri UNDER 63.5 -110 (Bookmaker)
Stanford +9 -108 (Heritage)
Stanford +280 ML (5 Dimes)
New Mexico State +12 -110 (Bookmaker)
YTD: 12-8, +3.25
CFB Card Complete
Comment
fitguy67
SBR Hall of Famer
03-13-11
5082
#28
Great call on Stanford (adding the ml-play...and going on record with it so clearly on that square-assed "lock" thread earlier today made it absolutely EPIC)...
It topped off a really really nice day of "stupid" LT picks...well, 61.5% of 'em were stupid enough, anyhow (8-5-1)