NCAAF Week 9 SBRtv Experts' Roundtable

[SBRPicks]

Zach from Accuscore.com and Steve from CollegeFootballWinning.com take a look at some of the lines from the Saturday Week 9 college football card.



Arkansas at Vanderbilt
The Arkansas Razorbacks mounted an impressive road comeback at Mississippi last week, good enough to get the win but not the cover. In Week 9, they are a 10-point road favorite at Vanderbilt in an intriguing matchup and line.
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/lPyFDDdsFMs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>



Baylor at Oklahoma St
The Oklahoma St Cowboys have been a great bet for a while now, and it's debatable whether having them as a 14-point home favorite over Robert Griffin and the Baylor Bears represents a fair line or if the market still hasn't caught up with them.
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/H8AxNKWVqBM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>



Stanford at USC
The Stanford Cardinal has been perfect against the spread this year, but may face their toughest test in Week 9 as a road favorite of more than a touchdown at USC.
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/UM6EqRXfB3I" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>



Marquee Matchups Rundown
The Marquee Matchups Rundown segment of the Week 9 SBRtv College Football Experts' Roundtable concludes with quick looks at the lines in the Michigan St/Nebraska game, Oklahoma at Kansas St, Stanford at USC, and Wisconsin at Ohio St.
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Igz6n50MQq8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[vitalogist]

Haven't watched yet. hope these clowns have opinions...

[CBASS]

Steve was correct about K-State:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Snyder

Snyder was still coaching K-State in 2004. So yeah, oh $hit is right...

[CarpeDime]

Steve was correct about K-State:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Snyder

Snyder was still coaching K-State in 2004. So yeah, oh $hit is right...

yeah there were fireworks in this roundtable

[CBASS]

yeah there were fireworks in this roundtable

Good stuff. I like when there's roundtable tension, especially when Steve and Zach put the gloves on.

[ApricotSinner32]

Agree with steve 100% with the stanford game... not with the pass on the game but that backing a 7-0 ats public side is a sucker bet no matter what. Free money theories do not work in the long term.

[SportsMushroom]

here's a thought, maybe talk to the guys before doing the videos and pick games on which they have a consensus opinion

how is this helpful to anyone on sbr if one guy says take one team and the other guy says take the other?

[sweepem]

lol the last one is great

[CBASS]

here's a thought, maybe talk to the guys before doing the videos and pick games on which they have a consensus opinion

how is this helpful to anyone on sbr if one guy says take one team and the other guy says take the other?

It's not the 'pick' that is important. It's the added info that each guy provides. Do you actually tail someone who simply says 'I like so and so'? Besides, some may value one's opinion more than another's.

[SportsMushroom]

It's not the 'pick' that is important. It's the added info that each guy provides. Do you actually tail someone who simply says 'I like so and so'? Besides, some may value one's opinion more than another's.

if they both provide info on the same side then the play becomes even stronger, if they each provide valid arguments for each side then the information cancels each other out and everyone is back to square one

[CBASS]

if they both provide info on the same side then the play becomes even stronger, if they each provide valid arguments for each side then the information cancels each other out and everyone is back to square one

Who cares if they agree? I sure don't. I use the info that I feel is important and apply it to a matchup I may be looking at.

[SportsMushroom]

Who cares if they agree? I sure don't. I use the info that I feel is important and apply it to a matchup I may be looking at.

well I care, and Im sure other people care too, you cant pick and choose which stats are relevant or not, you cant, one guys system says one side and the other guys system picks the opposite, obviously one of the two systems is wrong, you cant possibly know which one it is and you cant just decide which one is right because you do not have access to the data that they used to input into their system to come up with the right side

and still you gotta figure that if two professional handicappers like the same play it must have a good chance of cashing

[CBASS]

well I care, and Im sure other people care too, you cant pick and choose which stats are relevant or not, you cant, one guys system says one side and the other guys system picks the opposite, obviously one of the two systems is wrong, you cant possibly know which one it is and you cant just decide which one is right because you do not have access to the data that they used to input into their system to come up with the right side

and still you gotta figure that if two professional handicappers like the same play it must have a good chance of cashing

Sure you can.

[SBRPicks]

Nice call on Houston last night, let's see who comes out more right on Saturday with all the disagreements with these games!

[MichaelWaters]

i bet steve makes a ton of money on his bets. very choosey. hes right you cant take stanford they will be in a dog fight

[spladle08]

I havent watched these yet... bout to dive... lets hope for some good info

[CollegeOverUnder]

Lol dam that last video was awesome I got a good laugh out of that

[Sunde91]

This know it all weasel Zach with his smug smirk is the biggest fukin clown Ive ever heard

"Oklahoma State has a fantastic secondary" - 90th in pass Defense
"that wasnt Bill Snyder though" (completely straight faced and serious like he's talking down to him) - yes it was

didnt watch every video, any other glaring mistakes from the clown??