One man's opinion.....................
Way to go Big Ten. Not only do you continue to attach an outdated number to your conference name, you look like total boneheads for the new divisional names you announced Monday. LEADERS and Legends for God's sake. What's so hard about the trustworthy, reliable and easy to remember North and South or the daring East and West used by the SEC? Do you think these two make the conference look cooler? Also, Leaders and Legends will make it a little more difficult to remember casually. It makes about as much sense as the NCAA's decision to scrap the far-too-simple Division I-A in exchange for the politically correct FBS and FCS. Go back to the drawing board, Big Ten. I recommend considering "Three Yards" and "Cloud of Dust."
Welcome your comments...............
(*Dutch has a good thread on this topic.)
Way to go Big Ten. Not only do you continue to attach an outdated number to your conference name, you look like total boneheads for the new divisional names you announced Monday. LEADERS and Legends for God's sake. What's so hard about the trustworthy, reliable and easy to remember North and South or the daring East and West used by the SEC? Do you think these two make the conference look cooler? Also, Leaders and Legends will make it a little more difficult to remember casually. It makes about as much sense as the NCAA's decision to scrap the far-too-simple Division I-A in exchange for the politically correct FBS and FCS. Go back to the drawing board, Big Ten. I recommend considering "Three Yards" and "Cloud of Dust."
Welcome your comments...............
(*Dutch has a good thread on this topic.)