Line at -38, o/u 65
LT isn't that bad at all to begin with. I am not saying they will score a bunch, but if they do score 7 or even 10 during the first 3 quarters, it's very likely they will get a late garbage TD (or even two) when the game is supposingly out of reach by the 4th. Assuming LT does have 14, Boise would need 52 to just cover ATS. This is 66 right there. Seems like OVER is the safer bet if you do like Boise ATS.
Seeing Oregon pounding out 60 last week in a weekday game, Boise should be motivated to keep up with them. I know their D is good, but LT could and should score a couple TDs. Even if Boise does score 52+, you might not know which team win ATS until the last 5 minutes depending whether LT gets a backdoor TD. To me, I'll rather take the OVER if I had liked Boise.
LT isn't that bad at all to begin with. I am not saying they will score a bunch, but if they do score 7 or even 10 during the first 3 quarters, it's very likely they will get a late garbage TD (or even two) when the game is supposingly out of reach by the 4th. Assuming LT does have 14, Boise would need 52 to just cover ATS. This is 66 right there. Seems like OVER is the safer bet if you do like Boise ATS.
Seeing Oregon pounding out 60 last week in a weekday game, Boise should be motivated to keep up with them. I know their D is good, but LT could and should score a couple TDs. Even if Boise does score 52+, you might not know which team win ATS until the last 5 minutes depending whether LT gets a backdoor TD. To me, I'll rather take the OVER if I had liked Boise.
