Cal/Nevada O/U 66?

[tin8shusd]

I want to bet the over so bad but know I shouldn't. However, I remember last year when Nevada went up to Boise and the total was 66 - I took the under. Nevada got a mercy TD with one minute left to hit the over. I was crushed.

Is it wise to just stay away from totals this high? Thoughts?

[tin8shusd]

C'mon guys. Someone has to have an opinion on this one.

[ACCBlitz]

A game like this, I won't touch O/U. You'd think they SHOULD hit that amount. But time and time again I've watched games that should be high scoring end really low. GL if you play it. On paper it's a go. But this isn't played on paper

[The DiB]

Cal TT over 34 appealed to me more than the over 66. Cal's defense is a little bit of an unknown right now, haven't really been tested against UC Davis and Colorado. Thinking Cal should be able to score at least 34, just don't know if Nevada will be able to score enough.

[tin8shusd]

Thanks for the analysis guys. I'll take a look at the Cal TP prop - sounds safer than the combined total for sure.

[bowtakwah]

I would avoid this game. If you REALLY want to bet, why don't you pick -2.5 California?

But then again, CAL is 6-13 ATS in their last 19 road games and NEV is 26-12 ATS in their last 38 home games.

The lines opened at -1 CAL and got hammed to -2.5

[las8]

Cal TT over 34 appealed to me more than the over 66. Cal's defense is a little bit of an unknown right now, haven't really been tested against UC Davis and Colorado. Thinking Cal should be able to score at least 34, just don't know if Nevada will be able to score enough.

Nevada's D looks weak. I put a little on the over because Im unsure if Cal can stop the run, but i like this play more also

[falconticket]

I'm with Nevada and over
My opinion.

[NYER5680]

I took the over at 63