Under 52 Nfl*** Under 62 Ncaaf!!!!!!what Do You Think!!

[mshanedub420]

I think with the fast indoor field in Dallas that it will slow the game down by not allowing BF to have as much time to throw. Plus Green Bay D has played pretty well and if they hold Dallas to field goals instead of TD's for the most part, then it should be good. I think that all adds up to taking the under 52.

I also think that the under 60 is a good bet with Rut and Louis. Rut runs the ball with RR and their Defense can slow down the game a little bit. What do you think?

[mshanedub420]

Anyone?!!!!!!!?!?!?!?!?

[sikballplaya24]

I think brett farve just played in the dome in detriot? I see big over, give me reasons why it will be under when you have two explosive offenses with defenses that have huge holes...
GL though

[etothep]

I think brett farve just played in the dome in detriot? I see big over, give me reasons why it will be under when you have two explosive offenses with defenses that have huge holes...
GL though

Dal Team Defense:
YPG - 299.1 (7th)
RYPG - 82.1 (4th)
PYPG - 217 (21st)
PPG - 20.1 (10th)
takeaways - 23 (t-9th)
3rd down def - 38.5 (11th)

GB Team Defense:
YPG - 315.4 (12th)
RYPG - 100.1 (13th)
PYPG - 215.3 (18th)
PPG - 16.8 (t-5th)
takeaways - 20 (t-16th)
3rd down def - 31.7% (1st)

the D's look pretty solid
I think it is acceptable for us to assume that a decide number of the passing yards the defenses have allowed could be attributable to the fact that both teams have had decent sized leads in the 2nd half, forcing their opponents to throw the ball a lot & all but abandon the running game (plus dal had to play the pats...if you take away their game against brady, they then rank 7th in the nfl in pypg)

I'm not saying these 2 teams are the 2 best D's in the nfl, or even the nfc, but to say they both have huge holes is not something i would say is quite accurate