UCLA -6 1/2 to 7 Over Colorado

[BigdaddyQH]

One of the more unbelieveable lines. Colorado is 3-1, their only loss coming at home against Undefeated and #6 ranked Washington. Uceless, has lost it's last two games, and has a defense that is giving up an average of 43 ppg. Their QB is a showboat, and their HC is totally lost. Colorado also plays well against UCLA, going 3-1 ATS in their last 4 meetings. Grab Colorado State now, before the line has a chance to correct. Colorado State -7 available at Vegas and offshore shops.

[A4K]

Hard to take you seriously when you list Colorado State as the play and they have NOT played Washington this season. Washington beat Colorado.

[A4K]

I'll take UCLA -7 @ +108 @ 5Dimes. I watched the entire Washington @ Colorado game and Colorado l@@ked awful. UCLA wins BIG in this one.

[A4K]

Colorado has beaten Colorado State, Texas State and Northern Colorado and I'm supposed to get excited because their only loss is to a good Washington school? Colorado's QB has 6 TDs to 6 INTs and I'm supposed to believe he is going to win a shoot out with UCLA? I don't care how shitty UCLA's defense is they will wreck Colorado next Saturday. Rosen may be a bit cocky but he's going to light Colorado and that weak secondary up. This game will be a laugher. Save your money.

[BigdaddyQH]

If you had any bet points, I would take Colorado and the 7 and all of those points. But you have none, which indicates that things may not be going real well for you. With posts like your last three, I can see why. Are you some kind of UCLA homer? You know nothing about UCLA football. The one thing they do on a regular basis is quit on their Head Coaches after the first three years. UCLA is famous for their quitters and show boats. If that is the type of team you want to wager on, be my guest.

[A4K]

If you had any bet points, I would take Colorado and the 7 and all of those points. But you have none, which indicates that things may not be going real well for you. With posts like your last three, I can see why. Are you some kind of UCLA homer? You know nothing about UCLA football. The one thing they do on a regular basis is quit on their Head Coaches after the first three years. UCLA is famous for their quitters and show boats. If that is the type of team you want to wager on, be my guest.

Ha ha ha the old BetPoints argument. Funny, last week my BIG play was Virginia ML @ Boise State and you said it was throwing away money. I'll be back to rub your face in this UCLA win. I don't have any emotional attachment to UCLA but I've watched a few of Colorado's games and can tell you they are not on the same planet offensively as UCLA.

https://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/college-football-betting/3425229-virginia-boise-state.html

[BigdaddyQH]

I tell you what. If you actually wager at all, start a spread sheet in here and post your wagers like I do. http://bigdaddyqh.mysbrforum.com/spreadsheet/ That is my spreadsheet. Look at it. You can NEVER win like I do. NEVER. YOu simply do not have the ability to do so.

[A4K]

I tell you what. If you actually wager at all, start a spread sheet in here and post your wagers like I do. http://bigdaddyqh.mysbrforum.com/spreadsheet/ That is my spreadsheet. Look at it. You can NEVER win like I do. NEVER. YOu simply do not have the ability to do so.

I am a professional derivatives trader, betting on NFL and college kids is simply for fun. Never said you were not a good handicapper. I'm merely pointing out that you not only listed the wrong Colorado team as your play but you clearly haven't watched them play either.

Spreadsheets on SBR can be edited. If you want to do a head to head competition then start one and I'll join.

[BigdaddyQH]

If you are a trader, you must know that it is easier to make a lot of money if you have a lot of money going in. I did mistakenly put the word "State" next to Colorado in a post. The fact is that UCLA does have a history of quitting on their HC's. Mora already knows that unless he wins 8 games or more this season, he is gone. He is very lucky not to be 1-3 right now. UCLA still has games at Washington, Utah, and USC to go, plus home games against Oregon and Arizona State. He knows that he is history and so do the players. I cannot wager on a team like that. Look what a 1-2 Stanford team did to UCLA. 404 rushing yards. Unreal.

[A4K]

If you are a trader, you must know that it is easier to make a lot of money if you have a lot of money going in. I did mistakenly put the word "State" next to Colorado in a post. The fact is that UCLA does have a history of quitting on their HC's. Mora already knows that unless he wins 8 games or more this season, he is gone. He is very lucky not to be 1-3 right now. UCLA still has games at Washington, Utah, and USC to go, plus home games against Oregon and Arizona State. He knows that he is history and so do the players. I cannot wager on a team like that. Look what a 1-2 Stanford team did to UCLA. 404 rushing yards. Unreal.

Yep, the more money you have the easier the market is. Not saying UCLA can't lose this game but Colorado is awful.

[IMG][/IMG]

[BigdaddyQH]

I received your e-mail and here is what you have to do to make it a legitimate contest:

1. You have a maximum of 30 picks. What is the minimum?
2. If the minimum is also 30 picks, how many units per pick are we allowed.
3. Your dates include both regular season and the playoff/bowl season. Not good.
4. Who picks first? Can the other player see what you have picked if you pick first?
5. Are we talking S/U or ATS. If it is ATS, which line do we use?
6. Is this for College Football only?

Let me know.

[A4K]

I changed from the default.

200 picks Maximum and it ends 2nd week of December.

Minimum 150. Was including NFL games but we can reduce if you only want NCAA

We cannot see each other's selections until after the plays have locked.

I set it up for College and NFL but we can just do college if you want. Let me know

[BigdaddyQH]

200 picks is way too many. 60 College picks only. No minimum or maximum. 60 picks. Each worth one point. No weekly limit. You can make all of your picks or none of your picks on any given week.

[A4K]

200 picks is way too many. 60 College picks only. No minimum or maximum. 60 picks. Each worth one point. No weekly limit. You can make all of your picks or none of your picks on any given week.

Okay let me set it up.

[Eddy Munny]

I like Colorado, especially if it gets to +7. I have a feeling if I wait too long the line will move to +6 though. I don't think Colorado is exceptionally great or anything and this won't be a big bet of mine, but I do think getting points is generous as I feel like the Buffaloes have the weapons to move the ball consistently and keep the game tight.

I mean in all honestly, there are very few teams in the FBS that wouldn't find success against the Bruin defense.

Colorado did eventually unravel against Washington but the Huskies are an upper echelon team and the Buffs actually played respectable until a pick 6 swung the momentum eventually snowballed.

[Ralphie Halves]

Wow, by BigDaddy's betpoints math, I'm over 7X smarter than he is.

This is fake news though, it's way higher than that.

[veriableodds]

http://bigdaddyqh.mysbrforum.com/spreadsheet Why boast about such a small sample size. Your spread sheet showing like 38 wagers with like 10 of them ungraded ??MY goodness 500 plays would be a good start ,but 100-300 pick sample size cmon ,its like some kind of joke. I will buy you a beer in person if its even close to the 70% winners that are show now @ 500 .

[Capitols44]

If you had any bet points, I would take Colorado and the 7 and all of those points. But you have none, which indicates that things may not be going real well for you. With posts like your last three, I can see why. Are you some kind of UCLA homer? You know nothing about UCLA football. The one thing they do on a regular basis is quit on their Head Coaches after the first three years. UCLA is famous for their quitters and show boats. If that is the type of team you want to wager on, be my guest.

So does the former UCLA QB Troy Aikman qualify as a quitter?

[fried cheese]

So does the former UCLA QB Troy Aikman qualify as a quitter?

lol just thought this was funny since he literally quit going to oklahoma to go to ucla.

[JAKEPEAVY21]

agree, I like Colorado here. I doubt Montez will have another awful game like last week and Lindsay should be able to run against the shaky UCLA D. Colorado D should be able to get more stops than UCLA.

[A4K]

agree, I like Colorado here. I doubt Montez will have another awful game like last week and Lindsay should be able to run against the shaky UCLA D. Colorado D should be able to get more stops than UCLA.

Montez has 6TDs to 6INTs and Colorado has played ONE quality team. I think people are putting a little too much faith in him.

L@@k at his stat lines for each game this year. Against Colorado State he didn't do anything of note. Had 1 TD to 2 INTs. His only good games were against a Sun Belt team and a FCS team. Lol

UCLA blows on defense but their numbers are a little skewed because of that monster 1st half by Texas A&M to start the season. I see this game as a shoot out and Montez doesn't have the capability or weapons to keep up, especially on the road.

[1to1000]

Bigfool is an idiot

[BigdaddyQH]

Wow, by BigDaddy's betpoints math, I'm over 7X smarter than he is.

This is fake news though, it's way higher than that.

Ralphie, you are nothing but a dumb lying fraud. You do not even wager. You are so afraid of getting your worthless arse kicked. Now go back and continue playing with yourself because you do not have any money to wager.

[BigdaddyQH]

Montez has 6TDs to 6INTs and Colorado has played ONE quality team. I think people are putting a little too much faith in him.

L@@k at his stat lines for each game this year. Against Colorado State he didn't do anything of note. Had 1 TD to 2 INTs. His only good games were against a Sun Belt team and a FCS team. Lol

UCLA blows on defense but their numbers are a little skewed because of that monster 1st half by Texas A&M to start the season. I see this game as a shoot out and Montez doesn't have the capability or weapons to keep up, especially on the road.

The biggest problem I have with Uceless is that no one on that team gives a crap about the team or the game. They just care about themselves. UCLA is a school filled with stuck up arrogant snobs that think they are actually good. They are like Cal Berkeley. These kids turn put to be nothing after graduation. Their HC is afraid of his own shadow. With the talent advantage they have over Colorado, they should win by 14 points, but Uceless will find a way to screw things up.

[A4K]

The biggest problem I have with Uceless is that no one on that team gives a crap about the team or the game. They just care about themselves. UCLA is a school filled with stuck up arrogant snobs that think they are actually good. They are like Cal Berkeley. These kids turn put to be nothing after graduation. Their HC is afraid of his own shadow. With the talent advantage they have over Colorado, they should win by 14 points, but Uceless will find a way to screw things up.

And you accused me of being a homer? LOL, it is clear from your response that you have problems with Cal and UCLA on an emotional level. Probably why you haven't accepted my betting challenge. Deep down you know you are a fraud.

[BigdaddyQH]

http://bigdaddyqh.mysbrforum.com/spreadsheet Why boast about such a small sample size. Your spread sheet showing like 38 wagers with like 10 of them ungraded ??MY goodness 500 plays would be a good start ,but 100-300 pick sample size cmon ,its like some kind of joke. I will buy you a beer in person if its even close to the 70% winners that are show now @ 500 .

I post a new spreadsheet every season. I do not wager on a lot of games. I am very selective, which is why I am very rich. I settle for 58%, give or take. I am not greedy. I will be buying a lot more than a beer if I even get near 70%. Last season, thanks to a very good bowl/playoff season, I hit 60%. 48 and 32. I have only done that once before. Here is a little secret. If you wager $100 a game, you would have to wager on many more games than I do for both of us to mane the same money, assuming that we hit the exact same percentage of wins.

[JMF2479]

I like what you did on your spreadsheet. on 8/10 at 1:35 pm you made a bet for game on 9/2 betting Florida +3.5 , the same minute you bet Michigan -2.5 . did I read that correctly?

I post a new spreadsheet every season. I do not wager on a lot of games. I am very selective, which is why I am very rich. I settle for 58%, give or take. I am not greedy. I will be buying a lot more than a beer if I even get near 70%. Last season, thanks to a very good bowl/playoff season, I hit 60%. 48 and 32. I have only done that once before. Here is a little secret. If you wager $100 a game, you would have to wager on many more games than I do for both of us to mane the same money, assuming that we hit the exact same percentage of wins.

[Kiddpokerr]

I post a new spreadsheet every season. I do not wager on a lot of games. I am very selective, which is why I am very rich. I settle for 58%, give or take. I am not greedy. I will be buying a lot more than a beer if I even get near 70%. Last season, thanks to a very good bowl/playoff season, I hit 60%. 48 and 32. I have only done that once before. Here is a little secret. If you wager $100 a game, you would have to wager on many more games than I do for both of us to mane the same money, assuming that we hit the exact same percentage of wins.

Lol this freakung guy

[Ralphie Halves]

You cannot use spreadsheets to track accurately on here.

I can make my spreadsheet say pretty much anything I want.

Useless.

[GoBlue77]

I received your e-mail and here is what you have to do to make it a legitimate contest:

1. You have a maximum of 30 picks. What is the minimum?
2. If the minimum is also 30 picks, how many units per pick are we allowed.
3. Your dates include both regular season and the playoff/bowl season. Not good.
4. Who picks first? Can the other player see what you have picked if you pick first?
5. Are we talking S/U or ATS. If it is ATS, which line do we use?
6. Is this for College Football only?

Let me know.

you are so insecure its cringy. small rooster most likely

[1to1000]

bIGFOOL is a lying sob. That guy is so jealous of me its "F"in pathetic. I am sorry BigFool your wife still calls out my name when you are banging her, lol.

[BigdaddyQH]

bIGFOOL is a lying sob. That guy is so jealous of me its "F"in pathetic. I am sorry BigFool your wife still calls out my name when you are banging her, lol.

Listen you piece of s**t. No one in here brings in family, no matter how much we may or may not dislike each other. Only a jealous dumb, ignorant bas**rd like yourself would do so. You had better pray that I do not make a trip near where you reside because if I ever do, you will be the sorriest person on this earth. NO ARSEHOLE insults my wife. That means you, s**thead. For a dumb f**k with 70 posts, you have a big mouth. You have a problem with me? Fine. Bring it on. Start bringing my family into it and I will kick your worthless arse up one wall and down another. Do you understand, you prick?

[BigdaddyQH]

And you accused me of being a homer? LOL, it is clear from your response that you have problems with Cal and UCLA on an emotional level. Probably why you haven't accepted my betting challenge. Deep down you know you are a fraud.

Clarify the ending date on your contest and I will join in. The date had better read 11/26 or it is no deal. You have until 9:00 a.m Pacific time tomorrow to do so. Let's see if you have anything, or you are just like the other fools in here.

[1to1000]

Whatever bigFool, ask wifey when is the last time she saw me for happy hour, lol