Please!! Why do we have to suffer? This is what happens when you have too many Bowl Games going on the same day. Now we get to hear such brilliant statements like :"It is IMPERATIVE that Iowa answers Stanford's score". Really? With one whole minute gone in the game, it's imperative? Well, Iowa did not match Stanford's opening drive (ok play) so let's see what happens. In the mean time, I am going to look for the game on ESPN Radio so I do not have to hear Mushmouth.
-
-
Musberger great.. Gambles more than anybody on this forumComment -
Musberger loves this, he bet Stanford. Thats why he's so excitedComment -
Listen to his call on the fake fumble/TD for Stanford, like he cashed a bet on that one.Comment -
OP is just angry because he's not sure what the word "imperative" means.
Out in the sticks, they don't take too well to any of that book learnin' nonsense.Comment -
Mush is a great commentator. He loves the betting. Was funny when he broke away and talked bout championship game saying he was "talking with a friend of his from Las Vegas and he told me line was -7 and only getting stronger". Also obvious he's on Stanford and cashed his prop bet on the Stanford fumble.Comment -
Right after Iowa TD, "Guess who's winning the second half" -mush
Comment -
I like Musberger. I think he's still one of the best. Much better than Chris Fowler who bores the heck out of me.Comment -
"My friends in the desert enjoyed those last two TDs"
LmaoComment
or should I thank Iowa?? So confused.