The flag on the onsides kick in the UNC/Clemson game....

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BigDofBA
    SBR Posting Legend
    • 09-30-09
    • 19313

    #1
    The flag on the onsides kick in the UNC/Clemson game....
    That wasn't even close to being offsides. WTF.

    That ref needs to be fired.
  • Unwritten Law
    SBR MVP
    • 10-31-13
    • 2532

    #2
    Brutual BS call. Fix was in for Clemson to win today.
    Comment
    • BigDofBA
      SBR Posting Legend
      • 09-30-09
      • 19313

      #3
      I was at least expecting the replay to show it being close although they rarely call that if the players are even on the line....

      When the kicker touched the ball, everyone was at least 1 yard behind the line. LMAO. Unreal. What a dumbass ref.
      Comment
      • POOLSIDE
        SBR MVP
        • 09-06-14
        • 2839

        #4
        wowowowowowowow
        Comment
        • jimminn
          SBR MVP
          • 04-23-11
          • 1176

          #5
          Why can't a play like that be reviewed? Doesn't make any sense when it definitely was a blown call. Changes have to be made.
          Comment
          • BigDofBA
            SBR Posting Legend
            • 09-30-09
            • 19313

            #6
            Originally posted by jimminn
            Why can't a play like that be reviewed? Doesn't make any sense when it definitely was a blown call. Changes have to be made.
            That was the kind of call that decides a game.

            Why in the hell do we even have replay if that can't be reviewed. You should be able review critical calls like that in the last two minutes.

            UNC had some momentum on offense and that would have given them the ball at mid-field with 2 minutes and three timeouts left.
            Comment
            • POOLSIDE
              SBR MVP
              • 09-06-14
              • 2839

              #7
              Who decided we are allowed to review calls that are often strictly opinion (spot of the ball, was it a catch, did the fumble occur a tenth of a second before or after the knee hit the ground, etc) but we are not allowed to review calls that are cut and dry (offsides, was the hike before/after the play clock expired, etc)?

              Idiotic.
              Comment
              • Eddy Munny
                SBR Posting Legend
                • 08-13-13
                • 15768

                #8
                Originally posted by POOLSIDE
                Who decided we are allowed to review calls that are often strictly opinion (spot of the ball, was it a catch, did the fumble occur a tenth of a second before or after the knee hit the ground, etc) but we are not allowed to review calls that are cut and dry (offsides, was the hike before/after the play clock expired, etc)?

                Idiotic.
                Yeah, for real. It makes no sense. They may as well do away with replay and just go back to football the way it used to be. Sure, there'll be human error, but we get that shit in spades anyways... might as well bolster gameflow without all the stoppages if we are still gonna get games marred by poor officiating.
                Comment
                • dmncnlou
                  SBR Wise Guy
                  • 02-17-11
                  • 924

                  #9
                  Goes to show you. The refs are in on this shit!
                  Comment
                  • funnyb25
                    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                    • 07-09-09
                    • 39663

                    #10
                    this has happened time after time again this season...what they should do is put the ref on the podium who blew that point blank obvious call and have him explain to everyone on national tv what he saw while the replay rolls....
                    Comment
                    Search
                    Collapse
                    SBR Contests
                    Collapse
                    Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                    Collapse
                    Working...