Macks Picks Week 10 NCAAF

usma1992 · 11-03-15, 04:35 PM

If the teams names are next to the picks... that means they are preferred but not enough for the computer to suggest them to bet. Good Luck.

sportman12 · 11-03-15, 05:06 PM

usma1992 do you do NFL ?

Winning oasis · 11-03-15, 06:41 PM

Question - So the only plays are 2 unders because the team listed is only a "preference" and not a play? Tyia

Semper Fidelis · 11-03-15, 07:20 PM

Originally posted by Winning oasis

Question - So the only plays are 2 unders because the team listed is only a "preference" and not a play? Tyia

The 2 unders as well as the 3 sides: Buffalo, Baylor, and E Michigan. Speaking of which, that means a play for the listed spread, am I correct in that assertion usma1992? E.g. Buffalo -2.5, Baylor -17.5, and EMU +5?

Thanks for clarification and for providing your system plays! Very intriguing system here, will certainly be checking closely!

What is your expected/projected win % with these model plays? Hate to ask profit/unit potential bc actual win % (and ROI) is what matters most if utilizing Kelly system for wagering size to maximize profits!

usma1992 · 11-07-15, 09:30 AM

0-2--so far....

so far depending on what you got the Buffalo game at. They had to come way back than go for 2. Baylor game should have been a toss out since the quarterback is brand new.

One thing my data really can't take into account is if a quarterback changes.

Dave--

Yes I do NFL also. But I didn't publish the picks last week. If Eastern Mich covers I know I am on to something. EMU always blow.

usma1992 · 11-08-15, 06:02 PM

Went 0-5 this weekend and that is going to happen. Right now, I am 2-2 and the last bet generated was San Francisco, so I will be interested to see if it happens.

I know it is hard to imagine, but I have done worse that 0-5 before and normally just chalk it up to a bad day and move forward.

Dave