Indiana +9 at MSU

[No coincidences]

Spartans "found themselves" last week at Iowa, and their defense is ranked among the best in the nation. With that being said, they haven't had to face a spread attack quite like this yet. Indiana can and will score -- so does MSU?

I think a play on the +9 is in order, as well as at least considering the ML.

[RavensFan2k3]

Im expecting a bit of a let down after beating PSU...that was a huge win for them and I dont expect them to be able to duplicate this vs MSU

[No coincidences]

Just read two offensive linemen out for IU. Might have to scratch this one from my list.

[Louisvillekid1]

Had 'em against MIzzou (L) and Penn St (W)

Highly doubt they beat put up that many points on the road against this defense.

GL

[YungCiroq]

MSU covers easily, cant see that offense (Indiana) duplicating last week's performance on this Defense

[Fred The Hammer]

MSU covers easily, cant see that offense (Indiana) duplicating last week's performance on this Defense

IU won't get 44 but they have a ton of talent on offense. The QB Nate Sudfeld is young and throws some dumb picks but he made a 40+ laser TD on the move last week that only Aaron Rodgers and maybe Kaepernick on his best day could make. They have some nice WRs and RBs too....for exp. they put up 49 on Ohio State last year with the same kids returning. I won't play IU because of their D but 52.5 on Bookmaker looks pretty juicy to me. I think MSU came back on them last year in Bloomington and won 31-27 but that was with Coffman at QB for the Hoosiers and he's now 3rd string.

53 and MSU (-10) = Spartans 31.5 to 21.5. I seriously doubt anyone holds Indiana to 21 on a decent field in decent weather. The Indiana team total might be the play?

[YungCiroq]

IU won't get 44 but they have a ton of talent on offense. The QB Nate Sudfeld is young and throws some dumb picks but he made a 40+ laser TD on the move last week that only Aaron Rodgers and maybe Kaepernick on his best day could make. They have some nice WRs and RBs too....for exp. they put up 49 on Ohio State last year with the same kids returning. I won't play IU because of their D but 52.5 on Bookmaker looks pretty juicy to me. I think MSU came back on them last year in Bloomington and won 31-27 but that was with Coffman at QB for the Hoosiers and he's now 3rd string.

53 and MSU (-10) = Spartans 31.5 to 21.5. I seriously doubt anyone holds Indiana to 21 on a decent field in decent weather. The Indiana team total might be the play?

Good insight... May the best pick win... GL

[Louisvillekid1]

I like IU talent , just not in this spot. Like I said I backed then twice and wasn't scared to fire again after MIZZOU debacle against Penn st

[ZINISTER]

Buckeye fan for 35+ years. Our defense has sucked the last few years. They suck this year! I hate it!! Indiana is a potent offense the Big Ten isn't used to defending. MSU lost a talented DB last year Adams. With IU missing a few O linemen might be a long day for the QB MSU gets after the QB. It's a no-play for me. GL

[Fred The Hammer]

Hoosiers Over 21.5 (+106) for 3 bills. IU has a banged up O-line but they play from the shotgun and run alot of sweeps anyway and quick passes. They also have some nice return weapons on special teams. Win or lose straight up...this should cash.

[brewcrew2k]

Don't think Indiana is ready for prime time quite yet.

[Shark]

brewcrew,this is a 12pm est kickoff. Do you mean they arent ready for the spotlight?

[nvrlose37]

IU won't get 44 but they have a ton of talent on offense. The QB Nate Sudfeld is young and throws some dumb picks but he made a 40+ laser TD on the move last week that only Aaron Rodgers and maybe Kaepernick on his best day could make. They have some nice WRs and RBs too....for exp. they put up 49 on Ohio State last year with the same kids returning. I won't play IU because of their D but 52.5 on Bookmaker looks pretty juicy to me. I think MSU came back on them last year in Bloomington and won 31-27 but that was with Coffman at QB for the Hoosiers and he's now 3rd string.

53 and MSU (-10) = Spartans 31.5 to 21.5. I seriously doubt anyone holds Indiana to 21 on a decent field in decent weather. The Indiana team total might be the play?

That's ok they don't need 44 on Mich St. Michigan St got so much great field position from the Iowa game but could never finish the drives for TDs. If Indiana does that defensively as well, they can do this or at the very least cover.

[RavensFan2k3]

Uh oh

[Fred The Hammer]

Don't think Indiana is ready for prime time quite yet.

Hmmmm.....maybe Sparty D ain't ready for primetime

[Mr. Doughnut]

TOUCHDOWN! Now what about that vaunted MSU rush D?

[No coincidences]

TOUCHDOWN! Now what about that vaunted MSU rush D?

Yeah, it's one play. Settle down.

[Mr. Doughnut]

Yeah, it's one play. Settle down.

Never heard of a touchdown that wasn't one play.

[t-wizzle]

Line seemed high to me. I took MSU for that reason.

[Fred The Hammer]

TD Hoooooosiers....smart to change QBs there....give Sparty a much different look

[No coincidences]

Never heard of a touchdown that wasn't one play.

79 net yards rushing after giving up 64 on that touchdown.

[Fred The Hammer]

79 net yards rushing after giving up 64 on that touchdown.

IU is a passing team but they can't do anything if they don't have the ball. They can't get off the field on 3rd down as usual. I swear Indiana is never going to have even an average defense

[Fred The Hammer]

I learned to pause it when Indiana has the ball when I take a whizz or I might miss a TD. Man our offense is fun and exciting if the D can ever improve

[Fred The Hammer]

[Ticket #: 152155475] PARLAY (2 TEAMS) (FP)

10/12/2013 @ 09:00 AM	MU	[22039] TOTAL o46½-280 (NEBRASKA vrs PURDUE)
10/12/2013 @ 09:00 AM	MU	[22101] TOTAL o21½+106 (INDIANA U TOT PTS vrs INDIANA U TOT PTS)

Caught a huge break....Purdue hits a bomb w/40 seconds left!! Better to be lucky than good!!

[YungCiroq]

Good insight... May the best pick win... GL

Yupp