Money Burning Home Teams

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • WorkHorse
    SBR MVP
    • 08-22-10
    • 2185

    #1
    Money Burning Home Teams
    During the past five seasons (2008-2012), these five teams have been killers if you bet on them while playing at home.


    Worst Home Bets:
    Eastern Michigan (7-19 SU, 8-18 ATS)
    New Mexico St. (7-22 SU, 9-20 ATS)
    Akron (7-22 SU, 10-19 ATS)
    South Florida (17-15 SU, 11-20-1 ATS)
    Louisville (18-14 SU, 12-20 ATS)

    These five teams combined for a 56-92 home record while being a money burning 50-97 against the spread. My guess is these teams will be a good fade at home this season.

  • WorkHorse
    SBR MVP
    • 08-22-10
    • 2185

    #2
    Best/Worst Home Bets by Conference (2008-2012)
    (Straight Up and Against the Spread)

    SEC
    Best: Arkansas (24-9 SU, 22-11 ATS)
    Worst: Tennessee (23-15, 14-23-1)

    Big 10
    Best: Ohio State (33-5, 22-16)
    Worst: Illinois (17-17, 14-20)

    ACC
    Best: North Carolina St. (25-10, 23-10-1)
    Worst: Virginia (15-18, 12-20-1)

    Big 12
    Best: Oklahoma State (29-8, 23-14)
    Worst: West Virginia (26-9, 13-21-1)

    Pac 12
    Best: Stanford (31-3, 23-11)
    Worst: Washington State (8-22, 14-16)

    MAC
    Best: Northern Illinois (27-4, 18-12-1)
    Worst: Eastern Michigan (7-19, 8-18)

    C-USA
    Best: Louisiana Tech (19-10, 18-10-1)
    Worst: Tulane (9-23, 12-20)

    MWC
    Best: Utah State (20-10, 18-12)
    Worst: Wyoming (11-19, 11-19)

    Sun Belt
    Best: Texas State (3-3, 5-1)
    Worst: South Alabama (2-4, 0-6)

    Comment
    • Louisvillekid1
      SBR Aristocracy
      • 10-17-07
      • 52143

      #3
      Louisville should be pretty explosive and with that weak schedule I'd be careful fading..
      Comment
      • gojetsgomoxies
        SBR MVP
        • 09-04-12
        • 4222

        #4
        i like this analysis and appreciate it.

        but frankly if i blindly saw a team was 33% ATS the last 2 years i might prefer to go long the team than short with no other information

        basically i'd rather blindly long 25% ATS teams from last year than than 75% ATS teams from last year

        surely someone (me in the next few days) can look at 75%+ and 25%- ATS teams from the last 5 seasons and see how they did the next season.
        Comment
        Search
        Collapse
        SBR Contests
        Collapse
        Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
        Collapse
        Working...