Disappointments Continue

**guru-t** · 12-07-08, 11:52 AM

It sux.They could put Utah-Ohio st so that Tex could play Bama.BCS bullshit.

**dcbt** · 12-07-08, 12:12 PM

I'm reading Texas v Ohio St in Fiesta. Rubber match from the 05-06 series.

**jackpot269** · 12-08-08, 04:54 AM

Originally posted by wal66

First we are again disappointed that there is no playoffs for college football. Secondly some are disappointed with the Big 12 situation. Now were will certainly be disappointed with some of the bowl games we won't be seeing.

It completely sucks we will not see Taxas vs Alabama. Those two teams will be playing Utah and Ohio St. Not that Utah hasn't earned the right to play in a BCS bowl game but the bowl alliance could have easily made the adjustments to give us a very entertaining Utah vs Boise St game and a Texas vs Alamaba game.

Any of you upset about some of the games we won't be seeing? What are they and what would you rather see?

I could not agree more,but its about selling tix Alabama would sell out the Sugar Bowl this year if it were was the only team playing Utah want sell 12000 tix at any of the BCS sites so send them to New Orleans and it still sells out. Texas and OSU should have no problem selling out. I dont thank that Utah/ OSU would sell out in Tempe it might but this way, they know that both games sell out !!!! JMO

**wal66** · 12-08-08, 03:54 PM

Jackpot your opinion is dead on. It most certainly is all about the money. It just stinks that first off we are continually deprived of a true National Champion and we are being deprived of the best possible bowl match-ups as well. There are a few good games out there. USC/Penn will be a much better game in my opinion than anyone is giving it credit for being. Texas Tech and Ole Miss will actually be a very good game plus it gives us our first look at Big 12 offense vs SEC defense. TCU/Boise is a good game although I wish it was Boise/Utah.

Oh well it is what it is and as long as people go to the games or watch them the money will never stop flowing and force the powers that be to give us what we want.

**dle** · 12-08-08, 03:57 PM

The problem is Ohio State...not the other three. The Big Ten should not have the same amount of BCS teams as the Big XII this year.

**LT Profits** · 12-09-08, 08:18 AM

Originally posted by dle

The problem is Ohio State...not the other three. The Big Ten should not have the same amount of BCS teams as the Big XII this year.

But I don't think you can have more than two teams from one conference? If that is accurate, then Ohio State is a better choice than the second place team in the Pac-10.