If you had San Jose State today

[TwoWays]

Dog, your in a gambling forum...chill out with the grammar lesson and pick some winners. You and NC need to stop being downers.

[wager1]

I'm on the UNDER 62, small 1unit. Honestly see Cincinnati getting blown out, and did anyone see that XP? They're allowed to pick it up and score?

WTF was that? It wound up not counting anyway cause he was down at the 1, but I've been watching football for 30 years, and dont think Ive ever seen that. Always remember defense supposed to get away from ball after blocking it?? Like the dallas maimi game years ago

[No coincidences]

So you think forum rep is more important than actually earning money?

I know enough that posting plays does not work well for the majority of members who did or do and they will agree with me 100%........

Do you think people actually tail your plays?

So what is the purpose of keeping a degenerate play thread?

I just think you're full of shit and if you were actually asked to get serious about picking winners, it'd be entertaining to see.

It has nothing to do with "forum rep" or other posters tailing/fading. For me, it's about tracking my plays and being able to see what worked and what didn't. But you'd rather go the smoke and mirrors/slight of hand route, which is fine. You obviously spend a lot of time here like me and feel it's important to make threads based on plays, yet when it comes to actually tracking them, you clam up for some reason.

[No coincidences]

I have no logic, you just make it fun to bust your balls. Take everything so personal, GL this weekend buddy.

Good luck to you as well.

[Ambition]

Dog, your in a gambling forum...chill out with the grammar lesson and pick some winners. You and NC need to stop being downers.

We're not downers, we're realists. I'm just trying to help you out when you explain your thoughts/reasons on here so people don't take it the wrong way just as I did. Sorry if I insulted you in anyway.

[Ambition]

WTF was that? It wound up not counting anyway cause he was down at the 1, but I've been watching football for 30 years, and dont think Ive ever seen that. Always remember defense supposed to get away from ball after blocking it?? Like the dallas maimi game years ago

Yeah it was very strange to me. I actually thought the ball is considered dead after it was blocked on an XP but, he picked up and just started running for the corner.

[Believeland]

Paula Poker is an awful member on this forum and a person.

Paula stole the donated salvation army money from the bucket to re up his 5D account.

Paula once had sex with a 74 year old male for 20$ to make a longshot parlay.

Paula bets more air than Haines.

Paula once brocked Brock's play. I didn't even think that was possible!

[TwoWays]

I'm never insulted. We are strangers, no? And you two are not being real if you think that SJ got lucky in that game.

[Ambition]

I'm never insulted. We are strangers, no? And you two are not being real if you think that SJ got lucky in that game.

I didn't know you had to personally know someone in order to insult them but, did you watch what happened at the end?

[PAULYPOKER]

I just think you're full of shit and if you were actually asked to get serious about picking winners, it'd be entertaining to see.

It has nothing to do with "forum rep" or other posters tailing/fading. For me, it's about tracking my plays and being able to see what worked and what didn't. But you'd rather go the smoke and mirrors/slight of hand route, which is fine. You obviously spend a lot of time here like me and feel it's important to make threads based on plays, yet when it comes to actually tracking them, you clam up for some reason.

It has been 3 Years and you are still the same old Coin,

no progression whatsoever............

R u waiting for every dog to consistently cover?

yes -300

no +240

[TwoWays]

Well now you know. I watched the whole game. SJ was the better team and the score justified it.

[No coincidences]

I'm never insulted. We are strangers, no? And you two are not being real if you think that SJ got lucky in that game.

SJ wasn't lucky to win, but it was a lucky cover.

[Ambition]

SJ wasn't lucky to win, but it was a lucky cover.

No Coin, check your inbox.

[Ambition]

Well now you know. I watched the whole game. SJ was the better team and the score justified it.

It was sarcasm on my end. To cover the spread was lucky.

[PAULYPOKER]

SJ wasn't lucky to win, but it was a lucky cover.

True,
do you feel better now or do you want a refund?

[joco]

It's just a fukkin heartbreaker when ur covering and even winning
outright most of the game and lose like that at the very end. I'd rather be gettin blown out the entire
game than to lose like that. Both bg +7.5 ad the under..

[Ambition]

It's just a fukkin heartbreaker when ur covering and even winning
outright most of the game and lose like that at the very end. I'd rather be gettin blown out the entire
game than to lose like that. Both bg +7.5 ad the under..

Same here Joco. I was on BG +7.5 and the under, heartbreaker.

[Mike Huntertz]

Was a fumble and had SJS
I have lost some the same way, so
WooHoo!

[joco]

somehow im always on the team that blows the game/spread at the end. cant remember the last time i was on the lucky side...u would think it would be 50/50 based on simple probability

[Dexter]

san jose was clearly the right side....

[paco]

Go buy a fvcking lotto ticket.

Parlayed with the over!

[Shafted69]

you can add Cincy to the title of this thread ........... lol !

[Dexter]

at least you didnt have BG AND Duke....

holy fuckkin shit

[No coincidences]

I almost played Duke.

Speechless.