Angels TT tonight is over 4 (+131)

No coincidences · 07-22-12, 04:37 PM

Rangers TT over at + money as well.

Game under being heavily juiced.

Haren's going to actually show up?

JamesBrown · 07-22-12, 04:43 PM

Man, tough to say NC. Been leaning Angels at plus money but might throw the total in to a 2 game parlay. If anything I like the Angels team total over but will probably just play the side.

No coincidences · 07-22-12, 04:45 PM

Originally posted by JamesBrown

Man, tough to say NC. Been leaning Angels at plus money but might throw the total in to a 2 game parlay. If anything I like the Angels team total over but will probably just play the side.

I'm kind of leaning LAA as well, but it's hard to trust Haren coming off the DL. His track record has been less than stellar vs. the Rangers.

No coincidences · 07-22-12, 04:47 PM

If you notice JB, the Rangers ML has been on a slow creep upward all day long. I'm not saying that's guaranteed false line movement, but it doesn't look like any kind of big money has really hammered Texas.

starfire · 07-22-12, 04:49 PM

Halos baby

JamesBrown · 07-22-12, 04:58 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

If you notice JB, the Rangers ML has been on a slow creep upward all day long. I'm not saying that's guaranteed false line movement, but it doesn't look like any kind of big money has really hammered Texas.

I agree NC. Haven't seen anything line movement wise that would turn me away from the Halos.

No coincidences · 07-22-12, 04:59 PM

Originally posted by JamesBrown

I agree NC. Haven't seen anything line movement wise that would turn me away from the Halos.

As long as it works its way downward from here, I'll be on LAA. Probably won't mess with the total in any way, shape or form.

No coincidences · 07-22-12, 09:22 PM

Damn -- would've been a nice cash (TT over 4 +131).