Torres or Pujols who has been the worst buy and why. Kgo.

[NBAForTheWin]

Title says it all
I think Pujols has been worse for angels then torres for chelsea.

[lunchbawks]

Pujols deal for sure. It never had a chance of paying off. You need to produce hitting not get a player at his peak, he's only going to come down. Why are Halos fans even surprised? This had disaster written all over it. If it was a good move the Yankees or Red Sox would have signed him

[SOUP]

Pujols deal for sure. It never had a chance of paying off. You need to produce hitting not get a player at his peak, he's only going to come down. Why are Halos fans even surprised? This had disaster written all over it. If it was a good move the Yankees or Red Sox would have signed him

He's not getting any younger either to add to your point.