Stifler, are you gonna post next season as well?
-
Comment -
19.09.2012
S1
(A Bet) SD fade: Arizona 1,735 1,36u
(A Bet) KC fade: White Sox 1,645 1,55u
S3
(C Bet) TB: Tampa Bay 1,541 1,85u | Tampa Bay 1,541 5,268u | Tampa 1,606 13,396u
(A Bet) Tor fade: Yankees (game 1) 1,526 1,90uComment -
i think so...Originally posted by justin81
But i just concentrate on this season atm.Comment -
Price on the mound tomorrow. Going to be a massive bet.Comment -
Why are worried about Price?Originally posted by LakeyComment -
Thought Tampa were going to lose. Thankfully their offence showed up for a change.Originally posted by parlay100
Comment -
records:Originally posted by Stifler
S1: W 44 | L 0 (+44 units)
S2: W 32 | L 3 (-20,018 units)
S3: W 206 | L 5 (+107,647 units)
pending
- S1 Stl fade, B Bet on 21.09.2012Comment -
20.09.2012
S1
(A Bet) Stl fade: Houston 3,09 0,478u
(B Bet) KC fade: White Sox 1,645 1,55u | White Sox 2,01 2,525u
Comment -
Houston... Thats Kinky...........Comment -
You the fuckin man stiff!!!
Comment -
records:Originally posted by Stifler
S1: W 44 | L 0 (+44 units)
S2: W 32 | L 3 (-20,018 units)
S3: W 206 | L 5 (+107,647 units)
pending
- S1 Stl fade, B Bet on 21.09.2012
- S1 Stl fade, B Bet on 28.09.2012Comment -
21.09.2012
S1
(C Bet) KC fade: White Sox 1,645 1,55u | White Sox 2,01 2,525u | Cleveland 2,20 4,229u
(B Bet) Stl fade:LA Dodgers 2,11 0,90u | Cubs 2,62 1,173u
(A Bet) Pit fade: Houston 2,07 0,935u
S3
(A Bet) Bos: Boston 1,775 1,29u
(A Bet) Cin: Cincinnati 1,725 1,38u
Comment -
Stifler....do you reassess after each season which teams to follow in your system? Add or eliminate a team?
You mentioned on the first page that these teams were consistent for your 6 year back test (and clearly consistent in this 7th year as well) but would teams potentially be added/deleted from the system?Comment -
yes, well possible teams change next season (atleast a few). But it could also stay the same.Originally posted by kostiComment -
I was curios, why not Washington or Atlanta on the list for S3?Comment -
for today? They are not part of of system S3.Originally posted by parlay100
overall? Atlanta would be profitable aswell for the last 6 years (just 2 lost series in S3). Washington numbers dont look good. As i already said, other teams would be profitable aswell, but i just picked the teams with the best numbers.
Why focused on those 2 teams? Both with no S3 losses this year?Comment -
Was just curios, no complaints here. Thanks for the thread.Originally posted by StiflerComment -
records:Originally posted by Stifler
S1: W 46 | L 0 (+46 units)
S2: W 32 | L 3 (-20,018 units)
S3: W 206 | L 5 (+107,647 units)
pending
- S1 Stl fade, B Bet on 28.09.2012Comment -
I don't have odds stats to tell if they were favorites, but just looking at their home series records for 2012, Atlanta would have had 1 loss (vs Washington/Stl) and Washington would have had 1 loss (vs Yankees/TB, so they probably were not favorites). Hope this helps.Originally posted by parlay100Comment -
- D Bet parlay: Cleveland + Borussia Dortmund
22.09.2012
S1
(D Bet) KC fade: CHW 1,645 1,55u | CHW 2,01 2,525u | Cleve 2,20 4,229u | Cleve + BVB 3,28 4,081u
S3
(B Bet) Bos: Boston 1,775 1,29u | no line yet
(B Bet) Cin: Cincinnati 1,725 1,38u | no line yetComment -
???Originally posted by StiflerComment -
He's parlaying the D-Bet with a soccer game to reduce the stake.Originally posted by TheSportsAnalystComment -
22.09.2012
S1
(D Bet) KC fade: CHW 1,645 1,55u | CHW 2,01 2,525u | Cleve 2,20 4,229u | Cleve + BVB 3,28 4,081u
S3
(B Bet) Bos: Boston 1,775 1,29u | Boston 2,03 2,223u
(B Bet) Cin: Cincinnati 1,725 1,38u | Cincinnati 1,625 3,808u
BVB already ****** my D bet, Cleveland ml is the play on the D Bet.Hope u guys just play the ml. We will see if they get it done today.Comment -
- im giving it another try on a E bet. Reason is pretty simple. Overall lost amount (if E bet is a loser aswell) is the same amount as a D Bet Cleveland ml only.
22.09.2012
S1
(E Bet) KC fade: CHW 1,645 1,55u | CHW 2,01 2,525u | Cleve 2,20 4,229u | Cleve + BVB 3,28 4,081u |
Cleveland + Real Madrid + Sporting Lisbon 4,22 4,16u
S3
(B Bet) Bos: Boston 1,775 1,29u | Boston 2,03 2,223u
(B Bet) Cin: Cincinnati 1,725 1,38u | Cincinnati 1,625 3,808uComment -
S1 KC fade lost units: -16,545 unitsOriginally posted by Stifler
records:
S1: W 46 | L 1 (+29,455 units)
S2: W 32 | L 3 (-20,018 units)
S3: W 207 | L 5 (+108,647 units)
pending
- S1 Stl fade, B Bet on 28.09.2012Comment -
23.09.2012
S2
(A Bet) Phil: Phillies 1,676 1,48u
S3
(C Bet) Bos: Boston 1,775 1,29u | Boston 2,03 2,223u | Boston 2,16 3,891uComment -
records:Originally posted by Stifler
S1: W 46 | L 1 (+29,455 units)
S2: W 32 | L 3 (-20,018 units)
S3: W 208 | L 5 (+109,647 units)
pending
- S1 Stl fade, B Bet on 28.09.2012Comment -
24.09.2012
S3
(A Bet) Balti: Baltimore 1,541 1,85u
(A Bet) Tex: Texas 1,595 1,68u
(A Bet) CHW: White Sox 1,412 2,427u
Comment -
Is the balti game 1 or 2?Comment -
game 1Originally posted by dee_jasComment -
records:Originally posted by Stifler
S1: W 46 | L 1 (+29,455 units)
S2: W 32 | L 3 (-20,018 units)
S3: W 211 | L 5 (+112,647 units)
pending
- S1 Stl fade, B Bet on 28.09.2012Comment -
25.09.2012
S2
(B Bet) Phil: Phillies 1,676 1,48u | Phillies 1,694 3,573u
S3
(A Bet) Cubs fade: Colorado 1,787 1,27u
potential plays:
- S3 SD, if line <+100Comment -
records:Originally posted by Stifler
S1: W 46 | L 1 (+29,455 units)
S2: W 33 | L 3 (-19,018 units)
S3: W 212 | L 5 (+113,647 units)
pending
- S1 Stl fade, B Bet on 28.09.2012Comment -
26.09.2012
nothing todayComment -
how are you - units for your S2 plays yet your 33 - 3?Comment
