Boston line is currently @ +100, but i think it will go down a bit. Its a no play for me, as i cant stay awake till gametime.
-
Comment -
records:Originally posted by Stifler
S1: W 22 | L 0 (+22 units)
S2: W 17 | L 0 (+17 units)
S3: W 108 | L 3 (+31,528 units)
Boston fade should have been a play aswell, as the line stayed over +100...would have been a winner on the A Bet. Hope some of u put this game in.Comment -
29.06.2012
S2
(A Bet) Ari fade: Milwaukee 2,04 0,96u
S3
(B Bet) TB: Tampa Bay 1,758 1,32u | Tampa Bay 2,03 2,252u
(A Bet) Stl: St. Louis 1,485 2,06u
Comment -
I cannot realise that...Ari played 3 games in row vs Atl away - LLW so they are not qualified according S2...in other hand MIL are LLLLW...so don't we have to fade Milwaukee?Originally posted by StiflerComment -
Arizona's last 5 away games are LLLLW.Originally posted by Avala7ch3
Milwaukee are not on the list of teams to play through S2.Comment -
so it doesnt need to be in a row, does it?Originally posted by LakeyComment -
Lakey is right about the streak, so that qualifies for Arizona...
...as u can see for Arizona just count the losing streaks and start the chase when the streak got broken. Means we are following the losing streak for Arizona, thats why the play is on Milwaukee.S2:
Philadelphia
San Francisco (only winning streaks)
Arizona (only losing streaks)
Understood?Comment -
You need to update the list...Originally posted by Lakey
Comment -
Milwaukee in first place doesnt matter for the series. Its Arizona fade as stated above for the teams to play on S2.Comment -
records:Originally posted by Stifler
S1: W 22 | L 0 (+22 units)
S2: W 17 | L 0 (+17 units)
S3: W 109 | L 3 (+32,528 units)Comment -
30.06.2012
S2
(B Bet) Ari fade: Milwaukee 2,04 0,96u | Milwaukee 2,01 1,94u
(A Bet) SF: San Francisco 2,20 0,833u
S3
(B Bet) Stl: St. Louis 1,485 2,06u | St.Louis 1,515 5,94uComment -
booking Stl C Bet early, i think line will only get worse. There are probably more games for sunday, just wanted to put this info out asap.Comment -
records:Originally posted by Stifler
S1: W 22 | L 0 (+22 units)
S2: W 18 | L 0 (+18 units)
S3: W 109 | L 3 (+32,528 units)Comment -
01.07.2012
S1
(A Bet) NYY: NY Yankees 1,649 1,54u
S2
(B Bet) SF: San Francisco 2,20 0,833u | San Francisco 1,69 2,657u
S3
(C Bet) Stl: St. Louis 1,485 2,06u | St.Louis 1,515 5,94u | St. Louis 1,629 14,31uComment -
records:Originally posted by Stifler
S1: W 23 | L 0 (+23 units)
S2: W 19 | L 0 (+19 units)
S3: W 110 | L 3 (+33,528 units)Comment -
02.07.2012
S1
(A Bet) NYY: NY Yankees 2,15 0,87u
S3
(A Bet) NYY fade: Tampa Bay 1,82 1,22u
(A Bet) Cubs fade: Atlanta 1,541 1,85u
(A Bet) Det: Detroit 1,541 1,85u
(A Bet) Pit: Pittsburgh 1,592 1,69u
potential plays:
- S3 Oak, if line < +100
- S3 Balti fade, if line +100 or moreComment -
So place a bet on NYY AND on TB???Comment -
yes bet on both teams. I knew this crossover games would happen at some point.Comment -
Why don't we just wait to see what team loses so as to avoid getting juiced in game 1?Comment -
I will strictly follow this system. In ur version u should the losing team in game 2 to win 2 units, otherwise u will miss 1 series play.Comment -
I'm just going to do a 3 gamer on the loser.Comment -
And in the end u are going to win 1 unit, while im winning 2 units overall, if everything works out.Comment -
Hey I'm a noob so I was wondering what are the benefits of betting against both teams?Comment -
they are facing each other, dont know what ur point is. I mean we are fading NYY for the next 4 road games and playing TB for the next 4 home games.Originally posted by everythingred
I dont get it what ur on about the benefits of fading both? Do u mean over the season? Its not part of my system...Comment -
I hear ya stif, I just don't like the auto B bet. To me, that's not part of it.Comment -
- S3 Oakland added.
02.07.2012
S1
(A Bet) NYY: NY Yankees 2,15 0,87u
S3
(A Bet) NYY fade: Tampa Bay 1,82 1,22u
(A Bet) Cubs fade: Atlanta 1,541 1,85u
(A Bet) Det: Detroit 1,541 1,85u
(A Bet) Pit: Pittsburgh 1,592 1,69u
(A Bet) Oak: Oakland 1,885 1,13u
Comment -
records:Originally posted by Stifler
S1: W 23 | L 0 (+23 units)
S2: W 19 | L 0 (+19 units)
S3: W 113 | L 3 (+36,528 units)Comment -
03.07.2012
S1
(B Bet) NYY: NY Yankees 2,15 0,87u | NY Yankees 1,917 2,04u
S3
(B Bet) Cubs fade: Atlanta 1,541 1,85u | Atlanta 1,532 5,357u
(B Bet) Det: Detroit 1,541 1,85u | Detroit 1,541 5,268u
(A Bet) CHW: White Sox 1,847 1,18u
(A Bet) SF fade: Washington 1,826 1,21u
Comment -
-250 on Det tomorrow with Verlander on bump! Huge C bet with that much juice! Really considering -1.5 RL instead, or at least a portion. I mean, can Minny stay this hot? What everyone thinking?Comment -
Luckily I stayed away from Detroit..but u gotta lay the juice I had to.lay the.juice on Atlanta tonight around 138 to win 75$Trying to recruit members via pm to split week subscription of a handicapper 1/11/13 annieComment -
Bet the tigers run line! Verlander at home = game over!!!Comment -
my detroit bet today was canceled (due to pitching change), so personally i was lucky to get another B bet today. But i will count it as a C bet in here playing the ml today, cause that´s the way every game should be played. I know laying high juice is hard, but im getting ****** earlier this season playing -1,5 RL on NYY when they won with a single run.
In the end it always will be ur decision.Comment -
records:Originally posted by Stifler
S1: W 23 | L 0 (+23 units)
S2: W 19 | L 0 (+19 units)
S3: W 116 | L 3 (+39,528 units)Comment -
04.07.2012
S1
(C Bet) NYY: NY Yankees 2,15 0,87u | NY Yankees 1,917 2,04u | Yankees 2,30 3,008u
(A Bet) Stl fade: Colorado 3,06 0,485u
S3
(C Bet) Det: Detroit 1,541 1,85u | Detroit 1,541 5,268u | Detroit 1,40 20,295u
Comment -
Let's go Tigers!!!Comment
