As you may have noticed, the forum was offline for a period. We identified a security incident to Sportsbook Review Forum and took the site offline as a containment step while we investigated.
We wanted to make sure the system and site were restored and secured before bringing things back online and you will see that we are requiring all forum users to reset their password as a precautionary step.
If you have any questions, our moderators are around and happy to help where they can.
I find myself playing the +1.5 becasue those are the games Pinnacle tells me to play.
Comment
Ganchrow
SBR Hall of Famer
08-28-05
5011
#37
Raiders,
I'm agreeing with you here. I was just trying to answer EBone's question regarding selling a 2-run middle at +185 @ +185 based strictly upon his a priori assumption of a 30% chance of a one-run game either way. I do note that this represents a vast oversimplification.
Comment
EBone
SBR MVP
08-10-05
1787
#38
This is why I threw it out there. It totally makes sense to me, because of this discussion, that my theory was and is a "vast oversimplification". I should have taken all factors that have been discussed here into account. I guess I got lucky with what I was doing in June and July.
However, I still think, theoretically, that if I could find, on average, a -1.5 +186 on one side and -1.5 +186 on the other side and found that situation more than 50% of the time, that this would be a good representative sampling in a typical baseball season. The kicker is finding that particular situation more than 50% of the time, which, as I had indicated, was very hard to do. So, maybe my point is moot.
Great stuff though from Raiders and Ganchrow. I sure do like it when I come across people that are smarter than me and share common interests. Learning can be phun.
E
Comment
Ganchrow
SBR Hall of Famer
08-28-05
5011
#39
Originally posted by raiders72001
Good post but +206/-224 is better than -111/+101 for the player. Theoretical hold on +206/-224 is 1.78% while +101/-111 is 2.3%
Again. Mea culpa.
I just modified the original post to use better numbers.