Sunday Night Game?

pimike · 08-03-08, 04:46 PM

I'm on the home team Cardinals and Rangers both

ZBOIZ · 08-03-08, 04:50 PM

take TEXAS OVER 12

nervlol · 08-03-08, 04:57 PM

How confident are you on the Tex over? I'm tempted to bet a pretty good amount of money on something.

ZBOIZ · 08-03-08, 04:59 PM

I'm VERY VERY confident!!

ZBOIZ · 08-03-08, 05:00 PM

Texas will get lid up and Seattle will get lid up!

nervlol · 08-03-08, 05:00 PM

Alright, I'll go on it with ya, going to japan, so i need some spending money !

nervlol · 08-03-08, 05:01 PM

And by seattle you mean toronto right?

Deke101 · 08-03-08, 05:06 PM

ZBOIZ I like the Toronto/Texas OVER as well. Its hard not to. Two solid offenses, and two inexperienced pitchers with high ERA's. I also like the price on Texas at home.

In the Phillies/Cards game I like the Cardinals the most here, took them on the RL @ +180. I also put a small play on the over.

tevari · 08-03-08, 05:46 PM

STL team total over 4.5 [+100] for me.

Crayzee · 08-03-08, 06:01 PM

i like the st louis team total over also
also like the tex over 12 and maybe the tex total runs hits errors over 34

BigD · 08-03-08, 06:05 PM

Taxas and Philly

LT Profits · 08-03-08, 06:35 PM

I bet the Phillies -102 early

BigOrangeTitans · 08-03-08, 06:48 PM

Originally posted by Deke101

ZBOIZ I like the Toronto/Texas OVER as well. Its hard not to. Two solid offenses, and two inexperienced pitchers with high ERA's. I also like the price on Texas at home.

In the Phillies/Cards game I like the Cardinals the most here, took them on the RL @ +180. I also put a small play on the over.

How THE HELL is toronto even considered a remotely solid offense?

You guys truly baffle me. Let me see the numbers that show this is a "solid" offense pal. If the definition of solid were atrocious, I would agree with ya, but as we know it isnt the definition.

I'm on the Under as I see maybe a 6-2 or 7-4 final.

ZBOIZ · 08-03-08, 07:15 PM

Originally posted by nervlol

And by seattle you mean toronto right?

lol..sorry about that Toronto I meant.

ZBOIZ · 08-03-08, 07:16 PM

Already 3-0 Toronto

ZBOIZ · 08-03-08, 07:18 PM

Originally posted by BigOrangeTitans

How THE HELL is toronto even considered a remotely solid offense?

You guys truly baffle me. Let me see the numbers that show this is a "solid" offense pal. If the definition of solid were atrocious, I would agree with ya, but as we know it isnt the definition.

I'm on the Under as I see maybe a 6-2 or 7-4 final.

You will loose this bet. Ever since Toronto Fired there manager they been hitting better on Offense. You already down 3-0 in the top of the first, with a man on first!

BigOrangeTitans · 08-04-08, 01:48 AM

Originally posted by ZBOIZ

You will loose this bet. Ever since Toronto Fired there manager they been hitting better on Offense. You already down 3-0 in the top of the first, with a man on first!

Originally posted by BigOrangeTitans

How THE HELL is toronto even considered a remotely solid offense?

You guys truly baffle me. Let me see the numbers that show this is a "solid" offense pal. If the definition of solid were atrocious, I would agree with ya, but as we know it isnt the definition.

I'm on the Under as I see maybe a 6-2 or 7-4 final.

8-4 final, you sir were the lucky one. I had this game pegged and never had a doubt, while you were sweating. Good luck bud.

ryanXL977 · 08-04-08, 11:54 AM

agreed with BOT, anyone who thinks tor is a solid offense is smoking. they have one ajor league hitter: rios
and he is having a shitty year

scutaro, rolen, strais, inglett, eckstein

not one major league hitter