three 10pm games...who are u taking

[nysmoneyman]

Washington 38-64 (Road: 18-34) 10:40pm ET
LA Dodgers 49-52 (Home: 25-24) TV: MAS2, KCAL

WAS: J. Lannan (6-9, 3.29)
LAD: C. Billingsley (9-9, 3.32)

--------------------------------------

Arizona 50-51 (Road: 20-29) 10:15pm ET
San Francisco 43-58 (Home: 20-31) TV: FSAZ, KNTV

ARI: D. Haren (9-5, 2.58)
SF: J. Sanchez (8-5, 4.10)

--------------------------------------

Texas 52-50 (Road: 27-29) 10:05pm ET
Oakland 52-49 (Home: 31-24) TV: FSH, CSBA

TEX: V. Padilla (11-5, 4.41)
OAK: S. Gallagher (1-0, 3.00)


any thoughts...ML...runlines...over/unders

[Sactown]

Diamondsback -140 (Im a big giants fan)

Sanchez is starting to struggle lately and Haren is one of the top 3, imo, pitchers out there right now. I would take the under, but Sanzhez has the ablility to blow up which would get the SF bullpen involved which is not a good thing.

Might have one more later

GL

[ZBOIZ]

Dodgers will win

[Clueless_Norway]

D'Backs, $300 to win $208

Can't pass on Haren, it's to hard...

Leans:
Rangers
Dodgers

[ryanXL977]

tex
=dbacks


love tex tonite

[The_Kid]

I'm leaning D'Backs and the UNDER for the Nats/Dodgers.

[AC1318]

ari oak wash

but

the winners are ari lad

unsure of tex oak

always ML

[ryanXL977]

tex has the third best record since may 1st
oak has packed it in and cannot hit

[Clueless_Norway]

I realy like the Rangers today, but I never like betting on Padilla...
It's a good pick tho..

[ryanXL977]

padilla has been suprisingly good, i am not saying i am a believer but that offense can win games for them
i am much more worried about their closer, who sucks ass

i love etx today

[The_Kid]

Anyone taking the Nationals tonight? It's not like Lannan is all that bad... and the Dodgers offense is not all that great either. Billingsley has pitched exceptionally well this year, but I still think he's prone to struggle with his command once in awhile. What does everyone else think? Nats at +170 a good play?

[ryanXL977]

i did nats all 3 vs sf, but i dont like them tonite
i do like them tmrw though

[Sactown]

Diamondsback -140 (Im a big giants fan)

Sanchez is starting to struggle lately and Haren is one of the top 3, imo, pitchers out there right now. I would take the under, but Sanzhez has the ablility to blow up which would get the SF bullpen involved which is not a good thing.

Might have one more later

GL

Added:

Oak/Texas OVER 8.5 ~ EVEN

[Sactown]

padilla has been suprisingly good, i am not saying i am a believer but that offense can win games for them
i am much more worried about their closer, who sucks ass

i love etx today

Surprisingly good???

He had a great outing last time, but the two start before that ...

2.2 innings 8 Earned RUNS
6.0 innings 6 Earned RUNS

Either really good or REALLY bad.

I got the Over

[ryanXL977]

and what about the rest of his starts this year, or shall we only count the last 3?

[Clueless_Norway]

Surprisingly good???

He had a great outing last time, but the two start before that ...

2.2 innings 8 Earned RUNS
6.0 innings 6 Earned RUNS

Either really good or REALLY bad.

I got the Over

Thats why I want a +120 line or more on the Rangers with Padilla and no play today...

[Sactown]

and what about the rest of his starts this year, or shall we only count the last 3?

Check his year long stats...if you wanna say they are "good" then to each his own. Not trying to get into an argument here, but I just felt "surprisingly good" was inaccurate.

I just feel that his stats and watching him pitch he is below average.

[ryanXL977]

i am not saying is is good by any stretch
the term i used was suprisingly good, in comparison to last year i should have added!