This will be profitable. Guaranteed. I started tonight.
-
-
The more thy fall behind in the standing, the less effort they will give.Comment -
AgreeComment -
Giants had a slim margin for error with their formula in the first place. A lot of smoke and mirrors and late-inning magic from some guys playing way above their heads in 2010.
With the injuries they've incurred, they are now nothing more than a mediocre team at best.Comment -
you have greater odds betting on the under they dont give up a lot of runs and they sure as hella cant score for shitComment -
Comment -
I love Garza tomorrow. Just trying to decide how much to play them for. That line should not be more than +121. Good luck
Comment -
Giants suck!Comment -
Wonder why Pinny's hanging a +135 when other books are at +125, because I agree this is a good spot for the Cubs.Originally posted by Love The ActionI love Garza tomorrow. Just trying to decide how much to play them for. That line should not be more than +121. Good luckComment -
They are toast...Seems like whenever I see them they never have more than a couple runs...what do they average?Comment -
Yeah, that's exactly what I just responded to you with in my thread. Why are the Giants so expensive at -145, which is the same as Greek and MB. Doesn't that constitute one of Greek's "pinny plays" that have a profitable record?Originally posted by No coincidencesComment -
good idea lakerboy. They're getting shut out by Randy fukin Wells!Comment -
I agree withComment -
Who knows. I'm still waiting for the other shoe to drop at home for Vogelsong, whose ERA is slowly creeping upward but still miniscule at his park. Cubs shine in meaningless games, while the Giants are just being introduced to them. I'll take Garza in this spot and not look back, though the line has me hesitant to go big.Originally posted by Love The ActionComment -
you guys about the Giants, however don't get wrapped up in the Cubs. I made that mistake. They have a decent lineup and you feel like they should win, but for whatever reason they don't. Wheather it's Marmol imploding or Garza giving it up early, or their inability to move over runners. They just suck. Trust me, fade the Giants fine. But, don't fall in love with Garza tomorrowComment -
I'm with ya, just not big.Originally posted by No coincidencesComment -
Garza is the best pitcher the Cubs have, he is money.Comment -
Cubs suck worse than SF, I'm going against the public here. SF plus the over
Comment -
been fading for two weeks now.Comment -
When thread like this started, time to tail them
I've seen similar thread like this when Marines, Cub, Houston are on the slump. Pickda spot, but not fade every game.
BTW, anyone like Boston today? Love them in this spot.
Also tempting for Cincinati.Comment -
LB, I agree.Comment -
still lol @ Timmy last nightComment -
Mat Halladay Only +2 units on road this yearComment -
Guy was ratttttledOriginally posted by stevenash
Comment -
Threw twenty bones on your theory for CHIC against SF but I put it in a parlay with BOS to win vs. NYY (CC). Sweet payout but I'm not much of MLB so if it doesn't go that's that. Probably a wise theory though LB.Comment -
:lol ya I bet that payout on the twenty "bone" parlay is HUGE."This is why my basketball intelligence is unmatched on this site. I'm sure there are better cappers but no one can tell you the strategies of most coaches before the game even starts "
Goat MilkComment -
Comment -
Giants will win tonight.Comment -
A fun bet on a sport you're not great at reading should by all logic be minor. Good luck on your profit today.Comment -
Liking the over tonight on Chi/SF.Comment -
like always cubs will need 7 runs again for this to go over, good luck!Originally posted by hey buddyComment -
965 Chicago Cubs +126*
965 Chicago Cubs -1½ +210*
Comment -
on the cubs again myself at +130.Comment -
Have the Yankees big @ -130 and Cubs for a standard play @ +130 as my 2 plays for the night
I like this idea btw....Giants will be overvalued from here on out relative to how much they will win IMOComment -
Comment
