Mets vs. Reds under 8.5 runs
Giants vs. Phillies under 7 runs
Angels ML
Tigers ML
Love these plays, what do you guys think?
BigDan
Restricted User
04-28-11
5104
#2
like that ny/cincy un but the 8.5 is sooo juiced, actually hoping it drops to 8 before i play it, high juiced totals are bad for business, for me anyway.
hard to argue with laa but gonna look more into when i get home.
lean opposite on det/cws gm but not sure yet if ill play it.
Hate playing totals so low in phi but not like i want any part of that over.....GL tonight
Comment
Romanianbornwin
Restricted User
06-10-11
501
#3
Looks like some people are leaning more towards the White Sox cause Verlander struggles against the White Sox. This is not true. He's 7-1 with a 2.44 ERA against them in his last 8 starts. He struggled a little in his last start against them, but before then he pitched against the White Sox on 4/22, 7 innings, 3 runs (decent). Then on the road (like today) on 6/4, 8 innings, 2 runs (very good). Plus Verlander is a little better on the road, IMO. As for Peavy, on 6/5, he gave up 6 runs in 4 innings vs. the Tigers.
Comment
BigDan
Restricted User
04-28-11
5104
#4
trust me brother the reason i am on a team rarely coincides with why anyone else likes them. really didnt cap this as how Zoolander performs against cws. honestly didnt do to much capping on it at all as i got fukked up last night and havnt had the time till i get home from work but this div is just str8 up streaky and imho its chisox time to turn the heat up and jump right back in this race. besides them getting complacent in kc (who all a sudden is playing decent ball) they have looked really good since break. like these guys to get to .500 today and be a team to worry about down the stretch. Look for Peavy to hold is own and if this turns into a pen gm adv chisox.
i like pitchers of Peavy's ilk to bounce back the next time he sees the team that got to him, sure he not the same guy anymore and i dont expect greatness, but he does control lefties and has had great success against miggy and magglio. if he gives cws 6 in 2er type ball i like their chance to scratch out a late W.
Comment
KnowingNothing
SBR Sharp
04-11-11
402
#5
I agree with Romanian, big play on Detroit for me.
Comment
Ice House
Restricted User
07-21-10
4060
#6
Need some advice guys...
Okay should I do a 3 team parlay with 2 RL's
or a 4 team parlay with all ML and or a total
and if I do a 3 or 4 team parlay should I also do all the same guys in straight bets in case I just get 1 wrong?
also I have a 2 team parlay right now with Blue Jays ML and Rangers ML ... should I leave these 2 teams out of my next parlay or include them?
thanks
Comment
Romanianbornwin
Restricted User
06-10-11
501
#7
I'm playing all four bets by themselves, no parlay. You could do a parlay placing a little money, but I think it would be better if you put more money on 3 or 4 bets by themselves, in case one loses.
Comment
BigDan
Restricted User
04-28-11
5104
#8
Originally posted by Romanianbornwin
I'm playing all four bets by themselves, no parlay. You could do a parlay placing a little money, but I think it would be better if you put more money on 3 or 4 bets by themselves, in case one loses.
whether we agree on the gm or not this is some advice IceHouse needs to hear.
Comment
Romanianbornwin
Restricted User
06-10-11
501
#9
2-2 day, but still made a small profit because I put a little more on the Tigers and Angels.
Comment
KnowingNothing
SBR Sharp
04-11-11
402
#10
Mets vs. Red was a golden play, both players wouldn't have given away any more than 7 runs together but both pitchers had one of their worst starts in quite a while.
Comment
Romanianbornwin
Restricted User
06-10-11
501
#11
Originally posted by KnowingNothing
Mets vs. Red was a golden play, both players wouldn't have given away any more than 7 runs together but both pitchers had one of their worst starts in quite a while.
Yea the unders didn't quite work so well yesterday.