Every forum seems to ask this question and SBR will be no exception.
Should Pete Rose be allowed into the Hall of Fame?
8
Yes
0%
7
No
0%
1
Illusion
Restricted User
08-09-05
25166
#2
He did bet on the game but his onfeild contributions should allow him into the hall. He shouldn't ever be allowed to manage or hold any office positions however.
Comment
bigboydan
SBR Aristocracy
08-10-05
55420
#3
sure he should be IMO
Comment
onlooker
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
08-10-05
36572
#4
I vote yes.
He should be rewarded for what he did on the field. Because as a player, he gave his all. Thats what the Hall is about, what you do as a player.
Comment
bigboydan
SBR Aristocracy
08-10-05
55420
#5
if they let rose into the HOF, where does shoeless joe jackson stand then ?
Comment
Illusion
Restricted User
08-09-05
25166
#6
Originally posted by bigboydan
if they let rose into the HOF, where does shoeless joe jackson stand then ?
That's a seperate issue. Let's stay focused on the Rose question.
Comment
bigboydan
SBR Aristocracy
08-10-05
55420
#7
same sorta thing though ILL. if rose gets in, then shoeless joe probly will too.
Comment
Illusion
Restricted User
08-09-05
25166
#8
What does everybody else think about Rose getting into the hall?
Comment
Willie Bee
SBR Posting Legend
02-14-06
15726
#9
Put me down for YES as well. I've long felt former journeyman outfielder Jim Dwyer said it best: "The Hall of Fame is for baseball people. Heaven is for good people."
If it was my call, I'd let him in but not include him in any induction ceremony.