Giants/Tigers Under 7??

Salcas · 06-16-08, 12:30 PM

bump

johnnymapalo · 06-16-08, 12:35 PM

hmm, I can't go with no under 7. That's waaay too low for me. Maybe with 8.5 yeah but seven. I would go with the over with that because someone may get rocked early (Verlander) and shatter the low on the game..

Salcas · 06-16-08, 12:36 PM

Ya but giants cant hit..and Verlander looks like he is getting back to his usual self. Plus he doesn't get much run support. And Lincecum has just been filty. I see this game ending 3-2 in favor of the Giants.

gordon gekko · 06-16-08, 12:55 PM

I am on the over.

Salcas · 06-16-08, 01:05 PM

Originally posted by gordon gekko

I am on the over.

How come?

Wilforth · 06-16-08, 02:14 PM

Neither side appears to be able to get more than 3 runs tonight. Plus, the timing augurs well for the UNDER.

gordon gekko · 06-16-08, 02:58 PM

I got some good info from rake he's also saying its a 10 star play and he is a pretty good total capper.

Salcas · 06-16-08, 03:04 PM

I just cannot see this game going over. But gl anyway...

ryanXL977 · 06-16-08, 03:16 PM

i agree, under is the play if any total
but i am doing sf only

emat · 06-16-08, 04:06 PM

No play on the total. I don't ever like playing under on 7, maybe 7.5 or 8 but not 7. Too much can happen, especially with the Detriot lineup.