I say yes, his numbers don't lie.
270 wins, pitching in this era, all in the toughest division baseball.
I'mAWinner
Restricted User
12-10-10
963
#2
He's got my vote, man's-man. 270 wins in the AL East !
Comment
stevenash
Moderator
01-17-11
65624
#3
Originally posted by I'mAWinner
He's got my vote, man's-man. 270 wins in the AL East !
Thinking man's man
Comment
BRAVES1985
SBR MVP
05-23-10
4250
#4
what a way to go out 20-9 3.37
Comment
Bob Loblaw
SBR MVP
01-07-10
3508
#5
I say no. He was very good for a lot of years but I wouldn't consider him great. There's only one pitcher in the hall with a higher era than Mussina. You brought up wins. Good number overall but he didn't win 20 in a season until his very last year. He just never stood out to me as dominant which is who I think the Hall should be reserved for.
Comment
SBRMAN23
SBR Hall of Famer
01-07-11
6906
#6
Yes great yrs in balt n yanks and like u said numbers Dnt lie
Comment
stevenash
Moderator
01-17-11
65624
#7
Originally posted by Bob Loblaw
I say no. He was very good for a lot of years but I wouldn't consider him great. There's only one pitcher in the hall with a higher era than Mussina. You brought up wins. Good number overall but he didn't win 20 in a season until his very last year. He just never stood out to me as dominant which is who I think the Hall should be reserved for.
You go by adjusted era.
His career era is a full run + better than the average era in the time period he pitched.
If you factor in that adjustmen he ranks with the best of them.
Pitchers in the 60's like Koufax etc. etc. pitched to a 2.00 era when the league era was like 3.25
Moose pitched to a 3.5 era when the rest of league pitched to like a 4 plus era.
270 wins (33rd all-time)
74.8 WAR for pitchers (24th all-time) including top AL pitcher in WAR in 1994 and 2001.
.638 W-L% (37th all-time)
3.58 K/BB ratio (14th all-time)
Career ERA+ of 123.
57 career complete games including 23 shutouts
5-time All-Star, 7-time Gold Glove winner, 9 top ten Cy Young finishes
3.42 career post-season ERA over 23 games (21 starts)
Led MLB with 19 wins in strike-shortened 1995 season, won 20 games in 2008.
Comment
Bob Loblaw
SBR MVP
01-07-10
3508
#8
Originally posted by stevenash
You go by adjusted era.
His career era is a full run + better than the average era in the time period he pitched.
If you factor in that adjustmen he ranks with the best of them.
Pitchers in the 60's like Koufax etc. etc. pitched to a 2.00 era when the league era was like 3.25
Moose pitched to a 3.5 era when the rest of league pitched to like a 4 plus era.
270 wins (33rd all-time)
74.8 WAR for pitchers (24th all-time) including top AL pitcher in WAR in 1994 and 2001.
.638 W-L% (37th all-time)
3.58 K/BB ratio (14th all-time)
Career ERA+ of 123.
57 career complete games including 23 shutouts
5-time All-Star, 7-time Gold Glove winner, 9 top ten Cy Young finishes
3.42 career post-season ERA over 23 games (21 starts)
Led MLB with 19 wins in strike-shortened 1995 season, won 20 games in 2008.
A 5 time all star in an 18 year career doesn't really strike you as hall of fame material, does it?
As far as era goes, when I was looking at his stats I was checking other players in and around his time that stand out as hall of famers. He wasn't really close to them.
Mussina - 3.68
Pedro - 2.93
Clemens - 3.12
Maddux - 3.16
R Johnson - 3.29
It's just my opinion though. When someone says Mike Mussina to me, hall of fame doesn't pop into my head. When someone says pedro, clemens, maddux, r johnson to me, hall of fame does pop into my head.
Comment
Dukebluejms
SBR MVP
10-21-09
1633
#9
I'd say yes. He won't get in at first, but definitely will before long. He was so good for so long.
Comment
Metalhead
SBR Wise Guy
07-14-09
719
#10
I think he was a very good, consistent pitcher. Not one of the greatest ever though.
In my opinion, Mussina didn't have a really dominant stretch of seasons. I don't even put him in the top 5 from his era, so I can't put him in the hall.
Comment
Jackson Hole
Restricted User
01-22-11
96
#11
I say no, he was really never a dominat pitcher of his era, he was always solid though. But who ever said we have to go to the game because Mussina pitching. Pedro, Maddux, Johnson, Glavine, and Smoltz were all more dominant pitchers.
Comment
stevenash
Moderator
01-17-11
65624
#12
Originally posted by Jackson Hole
But who ever said we have to go to the game because Mussina pitching.
Me.
He's was my favorite.
The only time he walked a hitter was on purpose. lol
Umm, Maddux and Pedro are all time greats, as in two of the best *ever*, can't even put Moose in the same sentence.
Can't compare Moose to Smoltz, Smoltz closed (like Eck) for the Braves those three years.
Did a nice job for them while closing however.
I will take Moose over Glavine though. If Moose pitched 22 years like Tommy, he'd have 305 wins also.
Earned run averages about the same, but Glavine pitched in no DH league.