Wow! Total for the Cubs game is 13!!!!

[will2survive]

Never seen one that high--wind or not---that's a lot----I like the under there

[rfr3sh]

im on the over BOL

[SaviorTebow]

I want to pound the under so bad, but usually when something seems so obvious...you end up losing your shirt. Wouldn't surprise me if its 4-3 after the 1st inning alone.

[DrStale]

Never seen one that high--wind or not---that's a lot----I like the under there

[Hotdiggity11]

Took the over. GL everyone.

[Sdotbold]

ON the under, How windy is it there?? lol 13 runs . 4-0 in the bottom of the second tho

[B1GER1C828]

if your on the under you are in fact a square.

[whatsgood5]

IIRC There was a total set at 15.5 at Wrigley earlier this year...

[LolsMcwinsey]

IIRC There was a total set at 15.5 at Wrigley earlier this year...

and i believe it went over. over here is a free win

[will2survive]

I'm behind--it's on an over pace--but this "square" hasn't given up--3 innings can go by with a run....we'll see if the bats slow down

[Pauulzcappin]

You made a thread when you played an under on Wrigley earlier this year. It was set at 12.5, you took the under and the game ended 13-3 Reds.

[Mr KLC]

The line came up late at 11 1/2, and when it came up everybody hit the over.

[will2survive]

bottom of the 5th 4-3- --the scoring has slowed down a bit--and yes I did make that thread because there have been plenty of unders when the total was abnormally high

[will2survive]

4-4 top of the 6th----I need a scoreless inning here---even if theres an average of 1 run per inning the rest of the game,the under would win---c'mon

[will2survive]

C'mon... top of the 7th still 4-4- ---This square wants to win----let's go

[Pauulzcappin]

under is a lock, congrats guy

[will2survive]

thanks Paul--I don't know if it's a lock yet---but 4-4 top of the 8th --2 outs ---Looking good

[will2survive]

had a feeling the bats would calm down---people overreact to these bloated totals---5-4 cubs top of the 9th--barring a miracle--congrats to the unders

[DrStale]

Good job on the win, but regardless your reasoning was ridiculously square, much like when you said to bet on No run in the first inning bets "because when you really think about it teams don't score in the 1st inning that often." You need to put more thought into your bets if you expect to win over time. BOL.

[Sdotbold]

square bet still won. but doesnt mean anything to me as the astros gave up a 4 run lead to lose to the cubbies......gl everyone for the rest of the day

[Slim]

if your on the under you are in fact a square.

Over wasn't even close.

[Migraine1]

I saw this line and freaked out. Bet under all the way BIG. Come on now 13 runs for two baaad teams? This baseball not football. Never seen a line that big. Even when the Yanks and Blue Jays played it was only 10 runs....

[JMobile]

if your on the under you are in fact a square.

9/6/10 2:20pm MLB Baseball 961 Houston Astros/Chicago Cubs Under 13 -115* (W Rodriguez - L must Start C Coleman - R must Start)

This square won!

It's Wandy pitching and Coleman is facing the Astros..... and it was a total of 9 runs. 13 made it look so simple.