LB thread for MLB plays 2010

**lakerboy** · 06-30-10, 09:42 PM

Originally posted by broadway6

Cash those Royals now!!!!

**paco** · 06-30-10, 09:45 PM

Very nice Lb. I'm in a rut and had to take my unit down. I had $25 on the Whitesox

**broadway6** · 06-30-10, 09:45 PM

thanks for confirming my bet LB... i felt better putting 5x on the royals after i saw your post.

**lakerboy** · 06-30-10, 09:47 PM

Originally posted by paco

Very nice Lb. I'm in a rut and had to take my unit down. I had $25 on the Whitesox

Thats what us guys do though. As you saw i had many $25 -$50 plays the last few weeks in bases but others a little bigger in soccer

Thanks brother

Originally posted by broadway6

thanks for confirming my bet LB... i felt better putting 5x on the royals after i saw your post.

We escaped this one pal

Thanks for the points brother

**paco** · 06-30-10, 09:49 PM

Braaaaaaaaaaaazil!

**suicidekings** · 06-30-10, 09:49 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Yeah, that would've been a horrible beat.

Then again, betting on the Royals should probably be on a "never again" list as well.

I hit the Over, and lost the RL, so the game was a wash for me.

However, in 34 KC wins this season, the RL -1.5 has gone 23-11 for them, so I would say at (+170) tonight it was worth the risk.

**broadway6** · 06-30-10, 09:50 PM

Originally posted by paco

Braaaaaaaaaaaazil!

i like brazil to win..but i have to put a little on the draw too....it's the 2nd best bet on the board.

**Pauulzcappin** · 06-30-10, 09:52 PM

Originally posted by paco

Braaaaaaaaaaaazil!

I'm home boy and I'm not too sure about this game...

**paco** · 06-30-10, 09:52 PM

Originally posted by broadway6

i like brazil to win..but i have to put a little on the draw too....it's the 2nd best bet on the board.

I'm talking about the last Brazil match. I think LB knows exactly what i'm talking about

**No coincidences** · 06-30-10, 09:53 PM

Originally posted by suicidekings

I hit the Over, and lost the RL, so the game was a wash for me.

However, in 34 KC wins this season, the RL -1.5 has gone 23-11 for them, so I would say at (+170) tonight it was worth the risk.

Is that good? Seems like most teams would have a similar record in non one-run wins.

**Pauulzcappin** · 06-30-10, 09:53 PM

Brazil matchup well against Chile, not so much against Netherlands...

Netherlands have a good offense but they don't attack with too many players, so their defense isn't as vunerable as Chile.

**broadway6** · 06-30-10, 09:54 PM

Originally posted by paco

I'm talking about the last Brazil match. I think LB knows exactly what i'm talking about

yeah, i figured you were talking about the last game..just bringing up the game on Friday

**lakerboy** · 06-30-10, 09:56 PM

Originally posted by paco

I'm talking about the last Brazil match. I think LB knows exactly what i'm talking about

**paco** · 06-30-10, 10:00 PM

What are te odds for Brazil and Netherlands coming up?

**broadway6** · 06-30-10, 10:04 PM

Originally posted by paco

What are te odds for Brazil and Netherlands coming up?

5dimes

Brazil -1/2 -113 ML -104 (doesn't make sense)
Nether +1/2 -103 ML- +364
Draw+ 235

**suicidekings** · 06-30-10, 10:05 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Is that good? Seems like most teams would have a similar record in non one-run wins.

Only the BlueJays and Mets have more RL wins this season than the Royals. If you consider that they were actually the dogs in 27 of the 34 wins (with the ML in 12 of those being +140 or better), so you'd be playing the RRL -1.5 for much fatter odds on average, then yes. You would be up a good amount if you had played the Royals on the RL/RRL -1.5 in every game this season.

**lakerboy** · 06-30-10, 10:06 PM

Originally posted by broadway6

5dimes

Brazil -1/2 -113 ML -104 (doesn't make sense)
Nether +1/2 -103 ML- +364
Draw+ 235

its because more volume on ml so they charge more. same play essentially but retards are playing the ml cause they dont understand the ah

**Checkerboard** · 06-30-10, 10:06 PM

Originally posted by MidgetTossers

unreal start...i'll be seeing u guys when football starts

football starts tomorrow, argos are +13

**broadway6** · 06-30-10, 10:08 PM

Originally posted by lakerboy

its because more volume on ml so they charge more. same play essentially but retards are playing the ml cause they dont understand the ah

ML is -104 and the -1/2 is -112 They are charging more for the spread

**lakerboy** · 06-30-10, 10:10 PM

Originally posted by broadway6

ML is -104 and the -1/2 is -112 They are charging more for the spread

then that makes no sense. pinny has -102 for both.

**broadway6** · 06-30-10, 10:10 PM

Originally posted by lakerboy

then that makes no sense. pinny has -102 for both.

5dimes for you? you are right though a lot of retards make bets... i'm 1

**No coincidences** · 06-30-10, 10:10 PM

Originally posted by suicidekings

Only the BlueJays and Mets have more RL wins this season than the Royals. If you consider that they were actually the dogs in 27 of the 34 wins (with the ML in 12 of those being +140 or better), so you'd be playing the RRL -1.5 for much fatter odds on average, then yes. You would be up a good amount if you had played the Royals on the RL/RRL -1.5 in every game this season.

Interesting.

Thanks for the info.

**suicidekings** · 06-30-10, 10:15 PM

Originally posted by broadway6

ML is -104 and the -1/2 is -112 They are charging more for the spread

It just means that money is coming in on the Netherlands ML so the Brazil ML is being deflated accordingly. Greedy bettors trying to grab a big +364 winner are actually doing Brazil backers a favour.

**broadway6** · 06-30-10, 10:16 PM

Vlady just hit a grand slam. I hope MT feels a little better now.

**Pauulzcappin** · 06-30-10, 10:17 PM

Vlad Guerrero is a fukkin monster.

**MidgetTossers** · 06-30-10, 10:18 PM

Originally posted by broadway6

Vlady just hit a grand slam. I hope MT feels a little better now.

...i do

**broadway6** · 06-30-10, 10:19 PM

Originally posted by suicidekings

It just means that money is coming in on the Netherlands ML so the Brazil ML is being deflated accordingly. Greedy bettors trying to grab a big +364 winner are actually doing Brazil backers a favour.

makes sense. i'm leaning on a 1x bet on Holland and a 1x bet on the Draw. might be 2 losers, but i really like the draw and i love +364 even though i think Brazil wins 1-0.....so why am i not betting brazil

**daneault23** · 06-30-10, 10:26 PM

Originally posted by suicidekings

Only the BlueJays and Mets have more RL wins this season than the Royals. If you consider that they were actually the dogs in 27 of the 34 wins (with the ML in 12 of those being +140 or better), so you'd be playing the RRL -1.5 for much fatter odds on average, then yes. You would be up a good amount if you had played the Royals on the RL/RRL -1.5 in every game this season.

Not sure about this, but I saw a thread awhile ago about the Yanks winning every game by at least 2 runs. From that thread until now I believe there have been a couple 1 run victories for the Yankees, but they still have won like 40 somethin games, so wouldn't that make them having more RL wins than anyone in MLB?

To not sound like an idiot, i'll check it out real fast.

**daneault23** · 06-30-10, 10:29 PM

Okay, so I checked. The yankees have 47 wins and only 6 have been 1 run games. That makes 41 wins covering the RL. More than any other team.

**suicidekings** · 06-30-10, 10:33 PM

Originally posted by daneault23

Okay, so I checked. The yankees have 47 wins and only 6 have been 1 run games. That makes 41 wins covering the RL. More than any other team.

That number referred to total RL wins (both +1.5 & -1.5). The Royals have only 23 wins by 2+ (34 wins total). The big difference to your bottom line profitability is that the Royals have been dogs in most of them, so the RRL -1.5 would be offered at substantially better odds. Conversely, the Yankees have been faves in 43 of their 47 wins, with 24 of those wins being as -170 or greater faves. Even though the Yankees have won more games by 2+, the Royals still edge them out on value.

That was my fault. I mixed stats without clarifying.

**lakerboy** · 06-30-10, 10:49 PM

Good call Rangers backers. Angels suck. Happy for you guys.

**absolute** · 07-01-10, 03:25 AM

hey lakerboy, im new to the site and wanted to introduce myself to you. i heard good things about you from your counterparts. nice day you had yesterday. keep up the good word. so are you a socal guy or just a laker fan?

**Laker_crazy** · 07-01-10, 05:33 AM

Bro have sent you a Reply on your pm,please check and revert back

Regards,
LC

**doylfish** · 07-01-10, 08:54 AM

Originally posted by MidgetTossers

...i do

woke up to see my account nicely inflated from the texas win, congrats to you too MT, i guess that means you'll be around still

**Tommy_de1st** · 07-01-10, 09:06 AM

Originally posted by doylfish

woke up to see my account nicely inflated from the texas win, congrats to you too MT, i guess that means you'll be around still

You shouldn't be posting this here cuz LB-thread creator was on the opposite team