Guys, do you play SD ML or alternate RL today?
-
Comment -
The Pads are -121 ML, so we play the ML. We play the alternate RL if the ML odds are -115 or better.
KevComment -
I play ML, if lose by 1 I stop and take it as a loss on the series...Comment -
Thanks, Kev. The Greek had SD for -115 at the beginning, so i wonder.Originally posted by Kev the BritComment -
knugen:What he actually said was this:Eehh! Didn't someone in here say that last NFL season, there was only like 15 bet during the season? Now JM says in his mail that it can be like 100? Bets
"There can be up to 100". Thats not the same as saying that there will be 100 bets. So, he's not lying. He tells the truth so far as it suits his marketing, but not the whole truth, which is that there will probably be somewhere between 10 and 30 series. In theory, there can be 100 series, but its vey unlikely.As a matter of fact...there can be up to 100 (!!) potential 3-game series eligible for play under the system in this upcoming NFL season -- that's potentially 100 times you'll get to laugh all the way to the bank!
Regards
KevComment -
Well, its my opinion that the opening line represents the bookies' view of the likely result. So, if they opened with -115, they think the game will be a close run thing, with the Pads as slight favourites. So, IMHO you would be correct to use the alternate run line just in case they lose by one run.Originally posted by krzychu78
Regards
KevComment -
LOL at possibly up to 100 bets in the NFL
sadly the betting public will eat this up and keep buying his systemsComment -
Yeah, u are so right! Will someone send the bet in this thread?Comment -
I decided to risk it and play Angels on the ML... Went back and saw them at better odds on the RL, so went for both. Might have been risky, but now I'm sitting pretty. That's what betting is all about isn't it? Risk?Originally posted by rickbo528Anyone who wants to throw away their money on the Angels just send it to me instead.
Comment -
Say it ain't so!!!!!Originally posted by Kev the BritComment -
A v3 PLAY for tonite: San Diego Padres [a bet] vs. Arizona Diamondbacks -> ML play @1,82Comment -
If anyone played San Diego yesterday, you can take tonight's game as a B Bet, otherwise it's a
v3.0 A Bet, and it's better to get it on the Alt Run Line +1.5.
GLComment -
I bet on San Diego (B bet), but i take ML. Alt RL is -249 right now. That's too much for me.Comment -
San Diego Padres
C. Richard +1.5 -249Comment -
what books had padres opening at -115?
with that alt. run juice, best to play ml, or pass altogether.
i didn't play gm. 1 anyway.Comment -
Anybody having success with the WNBA system?Comment -
Yes, it is 8-0 so far.Originally posted by cheezhead62Comment -
No one that I can see.Originally posted by jphil
click on a point spread for the line movement.
covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/mlb/matchups/g4_summary_28.htmlComment -
Padres (+1.5) is silly. Ml and some on rl-1.5 (+130)
Pads big tonightComment -
Originally posted by el jefeNo one that I can see.
click on a point spread for the line movement.
covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/mlb/matchups/g4_summary_28.html
yeh, i see the greek(1 book that i can see) had 'em opening at 115 for a bit, as someone mentioned above, but haven't we traditionally bet the alt.rl when the line was more established & current at or below -115 throughout the day? Could be wrong. Doesn't matter anyway. Not gonna jump off a bridge because GOD says so. ML or NO PLAY.Comment -
When are NeXT official V1 bet?Comment -
Is there a thread for his football picks?Comment -
Well, I am on my C bet with the Pads with being the fav. all the way. So... 3rd time lucky as they say. They loose every time by point. So I hope so as this loss would half my bank. Are you guys confident about this one? Odds are getting shorter after each day for them despite their close losses. Lets hope the Pads dont let us down.Comment -
Aa, shit! C bet tonight on PadresComment -
yea.. another c bet for PAD! I hope this time pads gonna make it for cash. starter Latos is seemingly good.. my bookie has odd at 1.70 ML.Comment -
v3 Final [b bet] on Padres ML play @ 1,73Comment -
Pads gonna take this tonight!!Comment -
San Diego wins BIG tonight!Comment -
Hopely after the yesterday lose...fukk i was played a ML yesterday...:SOriginally posted by BigJComment -
Whatever you guys do today just be careful, according to the system rules SD won yesterday because it was an ALT RL play (+1.5) just as Toronto some weeks ago.
GLComment -
When on earth do we use the alternitive runline? They were fav. right? Mine was. So thats the rule. How can we know this? Thats just bad.Comment -
We should bet alternative RL when the odds are -115 or less. Yesterday only The Greek had San Diego at -115 for ~15 minutes. I don't think it was a win.Comment -
JM should alter Ver.3 system when the team is on the road.. even though it is favourate there are too many uncertainly in baseball like yesterdays' blown up.. colorado game was exactly the same..its the best way to secure a win taking Alt RL.. however you might be pass that series if it gone to loss because you have too much burden to cover it at the last game.Comment -
So can someone confirm to bet on "C" with Padres? By the way how can I take the alt RL (Betus or Sportsbook.com?).Comment -
Originally posted by pollito
so do you or anyone know what jm said in his v3 e-mail about it? if anything?
also, the line movements were more apparent(w/ many books) w/ the tor. series. Not like this scenario w/ 1 book opening at -115 for a very short while.
that's why i want to know what jm says about it, & if he does mention it as a win, then the brazin sob should mention what book that line was mentioned in.
yeh right.
for those who played rl, congrats.
For the rest, you have a B bet today ML(if ya want), unless ya countered jm rules & faded the A bet on fri.(then it's a C). It was a loss yesterday for the 99% of the betting world who played it nomatter what jm says.
Comment
